Trove
Sign In Sign Up

69 Stanhope Mews

Location
Mentions
6
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
3
Also known as:
69 Stanhope Mews East, Kensington, London, SW7 5QT
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

DOJ-OGR-00015286.jpg

This is a historical copy of a Land Registry title register, dated 21 January 1994, for the property at 69 Stanhope Mews East, Kensington, London. It shows that Ghislaine Noelle Marion Maxwell became the proprietor on 11 November 1988. The document also details a covenant from a 1904 conveyance that restricts the property's use to that of a private dwellinghouse only.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016497.jpg

This document is page 14 of a court transcript from August 10, 2022, related to the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The dialogue is between the Court and defense attorney Mr. Everdell regarding the admissibility of evidence concerning Ms. Maxwell's residency in London. Everdell argues that title records showing Maxwell owned a property at 69 Stanhope Mews prior to purchasing a residence on Kinnerton Street would prove she was not living at the new location earlier than claimed, while the Court questions why a proffered attorney witness is not present to testify to these facts.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00014526.jpg

This document is page 126 of a court transcript from the summation by defense attorney Ms. Menninger in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Menninger argues that the witness 'Kate' is unreliable because she claimed to meet Maxwell at a specific house (44 Kinnerton Street) in 1994, but property records show Maxwell did not purchase that home until March 1997. The defense dismisses a 2019 deposition where Maxwell claimed to live there earlier as an 'offhand remark' made without documentation.

Court transcript (summation)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search