This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It details a discussion between the Judge and defense counsel (Menninger, Everdell, Sternheim) regarding the trial schedule, specifically aiming to finish witness testimony by the following morning to allow for closing arguments and jury instructions on Monday. The court also mentions a pending motion to preclude and a previous ruling on anonymity.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the scheduling discussion and requesting defense response to a motion.
|
| Ms. Menninger | Attorney (Defense) |
Discussing trial schedule and the impact of an anonymity ruling.
|
| Mr. Everdell | Attorney (Defense) |
Discussing the potential for one remaining witness and the goal to wrap up.
|
| Ms. Sternheim | Attorney (Defense) |
Requests a moment to confer with co-counsel.
|
| Hyppolite | Witness |
Name appears in the header 'Hyppolite - direct', indicating the witness whose testimony might have preceded or follow...
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Referenced in footer stamp 'DOJ-OGR-00016722'.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied court location based on reporter's name (likely SDNY).
|
"So I'll get the defense's response to the motion to preclude on that this evening."Source
"your Honor ruled this morning on anonymity"Source
"Monday means closings on Monday and then charge and to the jury."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,360 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document