DOJ-OGR-00021560.jpg
562 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
562 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 22-1426) dated June 29, 2023, in which a judge is ruling on defense objections to specific paragraphs (79 and 81) of a report. The judge discusses Virginia's testimony regarding interactions at Epstein's properties, specifically noting that trial evidence disproved claims that Virginia was unaware of other victims. The judge overrules an objection regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's responsibility for sexualized massages performed by individuals brought by a woman named Carolyn, concluding that Maxwell's recruitment of Virginia set the broader scheme in motion.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Virginia | Victim/Witness |
Subject of testimony regarding interactions at Epstein's properties; recruitment set the scheme in motion.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Perpetrator |
Owner of properties; recipient of massages; engaged in sexual activity.
|
| Annie Farmer | Victim/Witness |
Mentioned in context that Virginia never gave her a massage.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Referred to as 'the defendant' and 'Ms. Maxwell'; raising objections to the report; responsible for recruitment scheme.
|
| Carolyn | Associate/Recruiter |
Brought women or other people to Epstein's residence.
|
| The Judge | Presiding Official |
Speaker overruling objections (implied by 'I am prepared to overrule', 'I do conclude').
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Footer information.
|
|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00021560.
|
Timeline (3 events)
06/29/2023
Court ruling on objections to a report (likely Presentence Investigation Report).
Court
Judge
Ghislaine Maxwell
1990s and 2000s
Unknown (Trial)
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Where interactions took place.
|
|
|
Where Carolyn brought women.
|
Relationships (3)
the defendant's recruitment of Virginia set the recruitment scheme in motion
Carolyn may have brought to Epstein's residence
She never gave Annie Farmer a massage.
Key Quotes (3)
"The credible testimony and evidence admitted at trial disproves these assertions which were made under oath."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021560.jpg
Quote #1
"I do conclude that the evidence at trial established that the defendant's recruitment of Virginia set the recruitment scheme in motion that resulted"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021560.jpg
Quote #2
"Ms. Maxwell had direct responsibility for any sexualized massages that several women or any other people that Carolyn may have brought to Epstein's residence may have performed"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021560.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,620 characters)
Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page130 of 217
SA-384
15
M6SQmax1
SA-384
15
M6SQmax1
1 Virginia, was unaware if she had interacted with anyone under
2 the age of 18 at Epstein's properties. She never gave Annie
3 Farmer a massage. She was unaware whether Epstein possessed
4 sex toys. She was unaware that he was engaging in sexual
5 activity with anyone other than her in the 1990s and 2000s.
6 She never gave Epstein a massage. The credible testimony and
7 evidence admitted at trial disproves these assertions which
8 were made under oath.
9 Paragraph 79, the defendant objects to the
10 characterization of the offense conduct as contrary to the
11 trial record. Here, defense hasn't provided any reason
12 specifying this, and I don't see one. So based on the written
13 objection, it's overruled.
14 Paragraph 81, the defendant objects to the assertion
15 that Ms. Maxwell had direct responsibility for any sexualized
16 massages that several women or any other people that Carolyn
17 may have brought to Epstein's residence may have performed, and
18 she contends there's no record that she interfaced with these
19 individuals. I am prepared to overrule that objection.
20 The paragraph makes clear that these individuals did
21 not interact directly with Ms. Maxwell. Nevertheless, for the
22 reasons explained a little while ago in overruling the
23 objections to paragraphs 27 and 28, I do conclude that the
24 evidence at trial established that the defendant's recruitment
25 of Virginia set the recruitment scheme in motion that resulted
2 the age of 18 at Epstein's properties. She never gave Annie
3 Farmer a massage. She was unaware whether Epstein possessed
4 sex toys. She was unaware that he was engaging in sexual
5 activity with anyone other than her in the 1990s and 2000s.
6 She never gave Epstein a massage. The credible testimony and
7 evidence admitted at trial disproves these assertions which
8 were made under oath.
9 Paragraph 79, the defendant objects to the
10 characterization of the offense conduct as contrary to the
11 trial record. Here, defense hasn't provided any reason
12 specifying this, and I don't see one. So based on the written
13 objection, it's overruled.
14 Paragraph 81, the defendant objects to the assertion
15 that Ms. Maxwell had direct responsibility for any sexualized
16 massages that several women or any other people that Carolyn
17 may have brought to Epstein's residence may have performed, and
18 she contends there's no record that she interfaced with these
19 individuals. I am prepared to overrule that objection.
20 The paragraph makes clear that these individuals did
21 not interact directly with Ms. Maxwell. Nevertheless, for the
22 reasons explained a little while ago in overruling the
23 objections to paragraphs 27 and 28, I do conclude that the
24 evidence at trial established that the defendant's recruitment
25 of Virginia set the recruitment scheme in motion that resulted
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. •••
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00021560
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document