DOJ-OGR-00017946.jpg

601 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 601 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It records a legal argument between attorney Mr. Pagliuca and the Judge regarding the permissible scope of cross-examination for a psychology expert witness. The discussion focuses on the concept of 'delayed disclosure' in sexual abuse cases and whether the defense can question the expert about alternative reasons for such delays beyond what was presented in direct testimony.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Pagliuca Attorney
Defense attorney arguing for the scope of cross-examination regarding an expert witness.
The Court Judge
Presiding judge managing the scope of questioning allowed in court.
Rocchio Witness
Name appears in the header 'Rocchio - Direct', indicating the witness currently on the stand or whose testimony is be...
Unidentified Female Expert Expert Witness (Psychology)
referred to as 'she', an expert in psychology and trauma testifying about delayed disclosure.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Court reporting agency listed in the footer.
DOJ
Department of Justice (indicated by Bates stamp prefix DOJ-OGR).

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
Court filing date of the transcript document.
Courtroom (Southern District)

Locations (1)

Location Context
Likely Southern District of New York (SDNY) based on the case context and reporter info.

Relationships (1)

Pagliuca Adversarial/Legal Unidentified Female Expert
Pagliuca is seeking to cross-examine the expert on reasons for delayed disclosure.

Key Quotes (4)

"Well, she's being proffered as an expert in psychology, to begin with, and trauma."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017946.jpg
Quote #1
"And the interplay between trauma, psychology, and delayed disclosure is simply not you're close to somebody and, therefore, you don't disclose or you feel embarrassed about something and you don't disclose."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017946.jpg
Quote #2
"I think that we're entitled to bring those things out on this expert who is testifying as a blind expert."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017946.jpg
Quote #3
"It's just fair game for cross-examination."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017946.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,514 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 73 of 228 749
LC2VMAX2 Rocchio - Direct
1 THE COURT: So the basic point is to the extent she
2 talked about the literature regarding delayed disclosure in the
3 context of sexual abuse, you want to ask if there are other
4 reasons for delayed disclosure.
5 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes.
6 THE COURT: And explore her expertise on those other
7 reasons?
8 MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, she's being proffered as an
9 expert in psychology, to begin with, and trauma. And the
10 interplay between trauma, psychology, and delayed disclosure is
11 simply not you're close to somebody and, therefore, you don't
12 disclose or you feel embarrassed about something and you don't
13 disclose. There are other things, and they relate to other
14 facts in this case. And I think that we're entitled to bring
15 those things out on this expert who is testifying as a blind
16 expert. It's just fair game for cross-examination.
17 THE COURT: I think there's two questions. There's
18 scope of direct and, I agree, to the extent that she's
19 testified for a reason about delayed disclosure, you can cross
20 her as to whether she's aware of other reasons for delayed
21 disclosure.
22 I think the question is whether there is a version of
23 that which is then seeking to solicit, sort of, not just I'm
24 aware of other reasons. Are you aware of this kind of
25 literature? Are you aware of that kind -- but to actually have
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017946

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document