EFTA00023179.pdf
57.9 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email chain
File Size:
57.9 KB
Summary
This document is an email chain from November 29-30, 2018, between Assistant United States Attorneys in the Southern District of New York (SDNY). Following the publication of the Miami Herald's exposé (likely the 'Perversion of Justice' series), the prosecutors discuss 'additional digging' and the possibility of reopening the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein because his conduct 'touched on New York.' A meeting is scheduled to determine the way forward.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeff Epstein | Subject of investigation |
Mentioned as 'the Jeff Epstein matter'; discussed regarding reopening investigation based on news reports.
|
| Kim | Recipient/Cc |
Cc'd on the email from Nov 29, 2018; associated with USANYS (SDNY).
|
| Unknown Sender (Signature Block) | Assistant United States Attorney |
Human Trafficking Co-Coordinator, Violent & Organized Crime, Southern District of New York. Initiated the discussion ...
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District of New York (SDNY) |
Jurisdiction of the prosecutors (USANYS mentioned in Cc line; signature block mentions Southern District of New York).
|
|
| Miami Herald |
Source of the news report/article link shared in the email.
|
|
| USANYS |
Acronym for US Attorney New York South, found in the Cc line.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2018-11-30
Conference call to determine the way forward on the Jeff Epstein matter.
Phone/Office
SDNY Prosecutors
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as the location where some of the conduct 'seems to have touched', justifying reopening the investigation.
|
|
|
Office location of the Assistant United States Attorney.
|
Relationships (1)
Emails discussing reopening investigation into Epstein based on conduct in NY.
Key Quotes (3)
"We've been able to gather some information on the Jeff Epstein matter and I'd suggest we have a call to determine the way forward."Source
EFTA00023179.pdf
Quote #1
"...after the news reports, [Redacted] and I were trying to do some additional digging to see if there was a way that we could reopen this investigation given that some of the conduct seems to have touched on New York."Source
EFTA00023179.pdf
Quote #2
"From the article is sounds like he cooperated in a financial fraud case and was non-prosd."Source
EFTA00023179.pdf
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,709 characters)
From: [Redacted]
To: [Redacted], [Redacted]
[Redacted], "[Redacted]
[Redacted]
Subject: FW: RE:
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 18:40:32 +0000
Importance: Normal
To: [Redacted], [Redacted]
[Redacted], "[Redacted]
[Redacted]
Subject: FW: RE:
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 18:40:32 +0000
Importance: Normal
I unfortunately am in another meeting at 3:30 today, but feel free to go ahead without me.
[Redacted]: Not sure if you had talked to [Redacted] about this, but after the news reports, [Redacted] and I were trying to do some additional digging to see if there was a way that we could reopen this investigation given that some of the conduct seems to have touched on New York.
Thanks,
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
From: [Redacted]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2018 1:39 PM
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted]; [Redacted]; [Redacted]
[Redacted]; [Redacted]
Subject: Re: RE:
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2018 1:39 PM
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted]; [Redacted]; [Redacted]
[Redacted]; [Redacted]
Subject: Re: RE:
Either of those times work for me. [Redacted] and I have a meeting at 2 so 3:30 would be better if possible.
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 30, 2018, at 1:35 PM, [Redacted] wrote:
All,
We've been able to gather some information on the Jeff Epstein matter and I'd suggest we have a call to determine the way forward. Does 3:00 or 3:30 today work?
We've been able to gather some information on the Jeff Epstein matter and I'd suggest we have a call to determine the way forward. Does 3:00 or 3:30 today work?
From: [Redacted]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2018 4:40 PM
To: [Redacted]
Subject: FW:
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2018 4:40 PM
To: [Redacted]
Subject: FW:
From: [Redacted] [mailto:[Redacted]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2018 1:36 PM
To: [Redacted]
Cc: Kim, [Redacted] (USANYS) 4 <[Redacted]>
Subject:
[Redacted]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2018 1:36 PM
To: [Redacted]
Cc: Kim, [Redacted] (USANYS) 4 <[Redacted]>
Subject:
[Redacted]
[Page 2]
Have you seen this article?
Have you seen this article?
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article220097825.html
Have any insight? From the article is sounds like he cooperated in a financial fraud case and was non-prosd.
[Redacted] and I can chat whenever.
Thanks,
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
Assistant United States Attorney
Human Trafficking Co-Coordinator
Violent & Organized Crime
Southern District of New York
[Redacted] 5
Assistant United States Attorney
Human Trafficking Co-Coordinator
Violent & Organized Crime
Southern District of New York
[Redacted] 5
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document