EFTA00020952.pdf

111 KB

Extraction Summary

6
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email correspondence
File Size: 111 KB
Summary

Attorney Robert Lewis emails prosecutors in the Epstein case to inform them that New York Times reporter Mike McIntire is aggressively pursuing his client, a potential witness and former employee. Lewis notes that the reporter claims Epstein's flight logs contradict the client's deposition testimony in the Maxwell case. Lewis asserts that Epstein's flight documentation is 'incomplete, if not materially inaccurate' and mentions his client destroyed personal documents pursuant to a prior settlement agreement.

People (6)

Name Role Context
Robert Lewis Attorney
Represents a potential witness (Mr. [Redacted]) in the Maxwell case; communicating with prosecutors.
Mr. [Redacted] Potential Witness / Former Employee
Client of Robert Lewis; subject of NYT investigation; gave deposition in Maxwell case; destroyed documents pursuant t...
Jesse Rose Employment Lawyer
Represents Mr. [Redacted] in employment matters.
Mike McIntire Reporter
New York Times reporter aggressively reaching out to the witness.
Jeffrey Epstein Subject
Subject of the 'charged case'; flight documentation discussed.
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant (Civil)
Mentioned in context of the 'Maxwell case' where the witness was deposed.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
New York Times
Media organization investigating the witness and ties to Epstein.
Second Circuit
Court that ordered unsealing of summary judgment papers.
Freeman Lewis LLP
Law firm of Robert Lewis (implied by website).

Timeline (2 events)

2019-03-01
Previous conversation between Robert Lewis and prosecutors regarding the witness speaking to them.
Unknown
Robert Lewis Prosecutors
2019-07-18
Approximate start of NYT reporter Mike McIntire aggressively reaching out to the witness and lawyers.
Various (Email, Phone, Home)

Locations (2)

Location Context
Implied by New York Times and Second Circuit references.
Visited twice by Mike McIntire.

Relationships (3)

Robert Lewis Attorney-Client Mr. [Redacted]
I represent [Redacted], a potential witness
Jesse Rose Attorney-Client Mr. [Redacted]
Jesse Rose (his employment lawyer)
Mike McIntire Reporter-Employer New York Times
New York Times (Mike McIntire)

Key Quotes (4)

"we understand that Epstein's flight documentation is incomplete, if not materially inaccurate."
Source
EFTA00020952.pdf
Quote #1
"Mr. [Redacted] destroyed all of the documents he possessed pertaining to the [Redacted], which might corroborate some of his testimony"
Source
EFTA00020952.pdf
Quote #2
"The Times also informs that flight documents purportedly do not corroborate certain portions of Mr. [Redacted] deposition."
Source
EFTA00020952.pdf
Quote #3
"According to McIntire, the Times is planning to run story on the [Redacted] and their ties to Epstein."
Source
EFTA00020952.pdf
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (4,211 characters)

From: "[Redacted]" <[Redacted]>
To: Robert Lewis <[Redacted]>
Cc: "[Redacted]" <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Epstein -- [Redacted]
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 01:02:41 +0000
Inline-Images: ~WRD164.jpg; image002.jpg
Bob,
Thanks very much for being in touch, and we appreciate Mr. [Redacted] continued willingness to speak with us if and when that would be useful. At the moment, we don't immediately need to speak with him, and we certainly will contact you anytime that changes. We're currently working our way through a number of interviews and investigative steps on the charged case, but I do expect we'll want to speak with Mr. [Redacted] in the coming weeks or months. Meanwhile, if anything else arises, please don't hesitate to reach out to us, and we'll do the same.
thanks again,
[Redacted]
From: Robert Lewis <[Redacted]>
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2019 14:11
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Epstein -- [Redacted]
Dear [Redacted] and [Redacted]:
I represent [Redacted], a potential witness in your Epstein case. As you will recall, we spoke about Mr. [Redacted] back in March, when you reached out to see if Mr. [Redacted] would speak to you and we agreed that you could. Although you have not contacted Mr. [Redacted], I thought you should know about some recent developments.
For the last week or so the New York Times (Mike McIntire) has been aggressively reaching out to Mr. [Redacted], Jesse Rose (his employment lawyer) and me (who represented him in the Maxwell case) by email and phone, as well coming to Mr. [Redacted] home twice. He is seeking our comments and information concerning the [Redacted] and Mr. [Redacted] testimony in the Maxwell case.
According to McIntire, the Times is planning to run story on the [Redacted] and their ties to Epstein. It also appears that the Times has a copy of all or a portion of the deposition Mr. [Redacted] gave in the Maxwell case, which is troubling because it was subject to confidentiality in that case and, although the Second Circuit has ordered the unsealing of the summary judgment papers (which likely include references to Mr. [Redacted] deposition testimony), no mandate has issued or documents been unsealed.
In addition, the Times tells us that a "representative" of the [Redacted] has told it that Mr. [Redacted] "lied" in his deposition. If a representative did that, it is both defamatory and breaches a non-disparagement provision in the settlement agreement with Mr. [Redacted]. The Times also informs that flight documents purportedly do not corroborate certain portions of Mr. [Redacted] deposition. We do not have access to those flight documents, but we understand that Epstein's flight documentation is incomplete, if not materially inaccurate. Also pursuant to his settlement of his employment dispute with the [Redacted], Mr. [Redacted] destroyed all of the documents he possessed pertaining to the [Redacted], which might corroborate some of his testimony,
We have rebuffed the Times' entreaties because of confidentiality obligations [Redacted] has pursuant to a settlement agreement in the employment case and the confidentiality order in the Maxwell case, as well as his desire to avoid doing anything that would undermine your criminal prosecution.
Should you need or want a copy of Mr. [Redacted] deposition transcript in the Maxwell case, we would provide it to you pursuant to subpoena.
If you wish to discuss these matters, please do not hesitate to call.
Best regards,
Bob Lewis
[Signature Block]
ROBERT Y. LEWIS
Cell: [Redacted] | Direct Tel: [Redacted] | Fax: [Redacted]
www.freemanlewis.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this message and any attachment is confidential and may be subject to the attorney-client privilege, or otherwise protected from disclosure by applicable law. Any disclosure, distribution, copying, or use of the information contained in this message or any attachment by anyone other than the intended recipient, regardless of address or routing, is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please telephone or email the sender and delete this message and any attachment from your system.
EFTA00020952
EFTA00020953

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document