| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ms. [Redacted]
|
Client |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Glen McGorty
|
Client |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Andrew Patel
|
Client |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Assistant State Attorney
|
Professional investigative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Witness in trial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
United States Government
|
Informant witness disputed status |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Robert Lewis
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jesse Rose
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED Respondent]
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
US Attorney's office
|
Informant interviewee |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employment |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Victim Specialist
|
Professional official |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (CBP Employee)
|
Acquaintance |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Brendan F. Quigley
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
SDNY
|
Witness cooperator |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MONTELL FIGGINS
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant State Attorney
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Acquaintance |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted (NYPD Commanding Officer)
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted CBP Employee]
|
Contact |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
John Reynolds
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
US Attorney's Office
|
Cooperating witness |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-16 | N/A | In-person meeting with Mr. [Redacted] (Witness/Client) | 1 St. Andrew's Plaza, New Y... | View |
| 2021-06-17 | N/A | Scheduled availability/interview for Mr. [Redacted] | Unknown | View |
| 2020-11-12 | N/A | Scheduled WebEx interview/proffer with Witness, Defense Counsel, AUSA, and two FBI agents regardi... | WebEx (Virtual) | View |
| 2020-11-12 | N/A | Scheduled second proffer interview via WebEx. | WebEx | View |
| 2020-11-12 | N/A | Scheduled Proffer Interview/WebEx meeting | Virtual (WebEx) | View |
| 2020-11-12 | N/A | Scheduled second interview/WebEx meeting regarding CBP topics. | WebEx | View |
| 2020-11-12 | N/A | Scheduled WebEx interview/proffer with Mr. [Redacted] and DOJ/FBI regarding CBP interactions. | WebEx (Virtual) | View |
| 2020-11-12 | N/A | Scheduled WebEx interview/proffer between US Attorney's Office, FBI, and Mr. [Redacted] (represen... | WebEx (Virtual) | View |
| 2020-10-07 | N/A | First Proffer/Interview meeting between SDNY and Mr. [Redacted] (implied by 'nice seeing everyone... | Likely WebEx/Virtual | View |
| 2020-10-07 | N/A | First interview/meeting (inferred from Oct 8 email saying 'nice seeing everyone yesterday'). | Likely WebEx/Virtual | View |
| 2020-10-07 | N/A | First Proffer Interview/Meeting | Virtual (WebEx) | View |
| 2020-10-07 | N/A | Meeting/Interview (implied by 'nice seeing everyone yesterday' in Oct 8 email) | Virtual (WebEx) | View |
| 2020-06-01 | N/A | Interview of Mr. [Redacted] | Unknown | View |
| 2020-02-07 | N/A | Proffer agreement signed | Unknown | View |
| 2020-01-01 | N/A | SDNY was in touch with Mr. [Redacted] (attorney) several times regarding representation of nine E... | N/A | View |
| 2020-01-01 | N/A | Investigators were in touch with 'Mr. [Redacted]' (attorney) several times regarding nine potenti... | Unknown | View |
| 2020-01-01 | N/A | Previous communications with Mr. [Redacted] regarding representation of nine Epstein victims. | Unknown | View |
| 2019-12-20 | N/A | Surveillance video recording that contradicts a statement made by Mr. [Redacted]. | Unknown (Likely prison/MCC) | View |
| 2019-12-20 | N/A | Meeting between Mr. [Redacted] (Patel's client) and the Government Office. | Government Office | View |
| 2019-12-01 | N/A | Meeting between Andrew Patel's client and the Government (US Attorney's Office). | Unknown | View |
| 2019-09-26 | N/A | FBI Meeting for Victims of Epstein (Planning/Communication) | New York Field Office (Cont... | View |
| 2019-07-18 | N/A | Approximate start of NYT reporter Mike McIntire aggressively reaching out to the witness and lawy... | Various (Email, Phone, Home) | View |
| 2019-07-12 | N/A | Phone call between Assistant State Attorney and 'Mr. [Redacted]' | Phone | View |
| 2019-07-12 | N/A | Phone conversation between an Assistant State Attorney (Palm Beach) and a recipient regarding Jef... | Telephone/Palm Beach County... | View |
| 2019-07-12 | N/A | Phone call between Assistant State Attorney and recipient ('touching base with you this morning'). | N/A | View |
An email dated September 26, 2019, from an FBI Victim Specialist at the New York Field Office to a male recipient. The email references a previous conversation and coordinates details regarding an 'FBI Meeting for Victims of Epstein,' noting that an invitation will be sent out by the following Monday.
An email thread from August 12, 2019 (two days after Epstein's death), discussing staffing levels at MCC New York. The correspondence reveals significant staffing shortages, noting that 0 out of 24 'P01A Correctional Officer positions' were filled and that the facility was operating at 83.70% staffing for correctional services. It mentions incentives approved since April 2019 to address these issues.
This document contains an email chain from July 26, 2019, regarding the delivery of a CPAP machine for Jeffrey Epstein. Attorney Jonathan Savella inquires about the proper protocol (mail system vs. other methods), and an internal official (likely BOP) asks colleagues if the attorneys can hand-deliver the device to medical staff as done previously.
This document contains a chain of emails between prison staff dated July 28, 2019, discussing Jeffrey Epstein's status, complaints, and medical condition while in custody. Key issues reported include a malfunctioning toilet causing Epstein distress ('aversive and disorienting'), his decision to urinate in a cup, complaints about meal frequency while in the Attorney Conference room, and physical symptoms including arm numbness and inability to make a fist. The emails confirm Epstein was on Psych Observation (but not Suicide Watch at that specific moment) as inmate #76318-054.
This document is an email chain from August 13, 2021, between Glen McGorty of Crowell & Moring LLP and Assistant US Attorneys at the Southern District of New York (SDNY). They are coordinating an in-person meeting with a client/witness ('Mr. [Redacted]') scheduled for the following Monday at 1 St. Andrew's Plaza. The discussion involves travel logistics, specifically missing hotel confirmations for the witness, and the requirement for all attendees to complete COVID-19 screening forms.
This document is an email chain from December 2019 between attorney Andrew Patel and likely the US Attorney's Office regarding the Epstein case. The discussion centers on the Government's obligation to produce notes from a meeting with Patel's client (whose name is redacted) to the defense counsel. Patel argues that his client is not a witness, the information is not Brady material (exculpatory evidence), and that revealing his client's identity or the fact that he met with the Government could compromise his safety. Patel notes that an 'error' made by his client is contradicted by surveillance video evidence.
An email chain from early 2021 involving SDNY officials discussing phone calls from a woman identifying herself as a victim of Jeffrey Epstein. The woman stated she was a former client of a specific attorney (name redacted) who had previously claimed to represent nine victims but stopped communicating with prosecutors. The officials plan to coordinate with the FBI regarding the caller.
This document is an email thread from December 20, 2019, between attorney Andrew Patel and an unnamed correspondent (likely opposing counsel or government prosecutor). The discussion concerns the production of interview notes regarding a client ('Mr. [Redacted]') under a protective order. The sender confirms that the client's name will be provided to defense counsel only on an 'Attorney's Eyes Only' (AEO) basis to protect their identity.
This document is an email dated July 11, 2019, sent by a witness (represented by attorney Robert Lewis) to law enforcement officials regarding the SDNY investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. The sender warns officials not to grant Epstein bail, citing his apartment in Paris and wealthy friends who could facilitate his escape. The sender describes Epstein's relationship with their 'former employer' as family-like, noting Epstein is the godfather to the employer's children (who call him uncle 'F') and that the parties exchange favors including money and use of private planes.
This document is an email chain from December 20, 2019, between attorney Andrew Patel and government prosecutors regarding the disclosure of information about a client of Patel's in the Epstein case context (likely related to the prison guards' prosecution). Patel argues against full disclosure, citing client safety concerns, and claims his client is not a witness but rather made an error in a statement that is 'contradicted by the surveillance video evidence.' The government proposes disclosing the client's identity to defense counsel only on an 'Attorneys' Eyes Only' (AEO) basis.
This document is an email thread from June 2021 between the DOJ Office of the Inspector General (OIG), the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS), and attorney Montell Figgins. The correspondence coordinates an interview with a redacted subject (represented by Figgins) scheduled for June 17, 2021. The OIG agent discusses procedural requirements, including the use of 'Kalkines' warnings (compelled interview forms) versus voluntary forms, and the necessity of recording the interview.
This document is an email chain between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and attorneys at Crowell & Moring LLP regarding the scheduling and scope of a proffer interview for a client (Mr. [Redacted]). The investigation focuses on corruption within US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) in the Virgin Islands, specifically regarding favors granted to Jeffrey Epstein to bypass normal entry processing and favors Epstein granted to CBP agents (such as trips to his island). The emails arrange a WebEx meeting for November 2020 involving FBI agents to discuss these specific allegations and a CBP employee who had the witness in his phone contacts.
This document is an email chain originating on July 12, 2019, shortly after Jeffrey Epstein's arrest, and forwarded internally within the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) in August 2020. The core message is from an Assistant State Attorney in the 15th Judicial Circuit (Palm Beach, FL) Special Victim's Unit, reaching out to a contact to express interest in pursuing local criminal charges for crimes occurring in Palm Beach County. The prosecutor asks to be put in contact with any victims willing to make statements to local law enforcement.
This document contains an email chain between attorney John H. Reynolds and an Assistant US Attorney for the Southern District of New York regarding the SDNY investigation into Ghislaine Maxwell. The correspondence, dating from July to September 2020, confirms that Reynolds represents a client (name redacted) who is cooperating with the investigation and is expected to be called as a witness at the Maxwell trial. The emails also involve scheduling calls and sharing a NY Post article relevant to the case.
This document contains email correspondence between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and defense counsel Glen McGorty of Crowell & Moring LLP regarding a cooperating witness (Mr. [Redacted]). The emails arrange proffer interviews via WebEx and discuss the witness's potential testimony at Ghislaine Maxwell's trial in November 2021. Key topics of interest for the prosecution include Epstein's relationship with Customs and Border Protection (CBP) in the Virgin Islands, specifically whether Epstein provided favors (such as trips to his island) to CBP agents in exchange for bypassing standard immigration processing for himself and his guests.
This document is an email chain between defense attorney Glen McGorty (Crowell & Moring) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY), spanning October 2020 to May 2021. The correspondence concerns the scheduling of 'proffer' interviews for a witness (Mr. [Redacted]) who is cooperating with the government's investigation into Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. Key topics of the interviews include the witness's knowledge of Epstein's interactions with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) employees in the Virgin Islands, specifically regarding favors, bypassing customs processing, and trips to Epstein's island. The emails also confirm the witness's willingness to testify at Ms. Maxwell's trial.
This email chain from June 2020 involves attorney Brendan F. Quigley and likely SDNY officials. SDNY informs Quigley that a civil attorney involved in Epstein litigation is seeking to serve Quigley's client (Mr. [Redacted]) and asks if they should pass along contact info; Quigley declines. The chain also references a proffer agreement signed by the client in February 2020.
This document is an email chain from February 25, 2021, involving FBI agents and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York. They discuss a phone call received from a woman claiming to be a victim of Jeffrey Epstein and a former client of a specific attorney regarding the Victim Fund. The team coordinates an FBI follow-up for an initial screening of the woman, noting that her former attorney had previously been uncooperative with investigators in 2020.
Attorney Robert Lewis emails prosecutors in the Epstein case to inform them that New York Times reporter Mike McIntire is aggressively pursuing his client, a potential witness and former employee. Lewis notes that the reporter claims Epstein's flight logs contradict the client's deposition testimony in the Maxwell case. Lewis asserts that Epstein's flight documentation is 'incomplete, if not materially inaccurate' and mentions his client destroyed personal documents pursuant to a prior settlement agreement.
An email dated June 8, 2020, from attorney Robert Glassman of Panish Shea & Boyle LLP regarding a 'Touhy Request' for tangible and documentary evidence in the case of Jane Doe v. Indyke et al. (SDNY Case No. 1:20-cv-00484-JGK-DCF). The email serves as a cover letter for an attached PDF document, noting that a physical copy will also be sent via FedEx. The recipient's name and contact information are redacted.
This document is an email chain between Glen McGorty of Crowell & Moring LLP and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York regarding the scheduling and preparation for a second proffer interview with a witness (Mr. [Redacted]). The prosecutors specifically intend to question the witness about his relationship with a U.S. Customs and Border Protection employee in St. Thomas who had the witness's number in their phone, and what the witness knows about that CBP employee's interactions with Jeffrey Epstein. A proffer agreement was signed and executed in early October 2020.
This document is an email thread from early 2021 among staff at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). It details a series of phone calls from a woman claiming to be a victim of Jeffrey Epstein and a former client of a specific attorney regarding the Victim Fund. The AUSA notes that this attorney had previously claimed to represent nine victims in 2020 but stopped cooperating. The thread shows the prosecutors trying to get federal agents to return the victim's calls as she became increasingly insistent.
This document is an email chain from early 2021 involving an Assistant U.S. Attorney (SDNY) and other officials discussing repeated phone calls from a woman identifying herself as a victim of Jeffrey Epstein. The victim was seeking information and a follow-up from agents, noting her former attorney (who previously claimed to represent nine victims but stopped cooperating) was no longer representing her. The officials discuss coordinating an agent to reach out to her after multiple attempts.
An email chain from December 23, 2020, between unidentified officials discussing the status of a sealed warrant for a 'Triggerfish' (surveillance/tracking device) related to Ghislaine Maxwell in the District of New Hampshire (DNH). The correspondence centers on whether to extend the seal on the warrant or allow it to lapse as it approaches expiration.
This document is an email chain from November 2021 regarding legal proceedings. Laura Menninger of Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C. sends a supplemental letter to USANYS counsel regarding the anticipated testimony of a redacted individual (Mr. [Redacted]). The forwarding email references 'Flatley and their rebuttal expert,' suggesting the correspondence concerns expert witness testimony or rebuttal.
Notification that '583 and DHO report' are attached and 'SIS report' will be sent later.
attached is the Epstein SIS report.
Cover note regarding an attached time line of events for Mr. Epstein.
attached is the Epstein SIS report.
Follow-up to a conversation regarding contact information and an upcoming email invitation for a meeting.
Detailed staffing statistics for MCC New York Pay Period 15, noting significant vacancies and lack of filled positions.
Inquiry regarding approval for Mr. Epstein to receive a CPAP machine and whether it should be sent via inmate mail system.
Expressing interest in information leading to criminal charges in Palm Beach County and asking for victims willing to make statements.
Stating interest in information leading to criminal charges for crimes in Palm Beach County and asking for victim statements.
Inquiring about information leading to criminal charges for crimes in Palm Beach County and asking for victims willing to make statements.
Inquiry from the State Attorney's office regarding information leading to criminal charges in Palm Beach County and request for victim statements.
Clarification of Epstein's status as a Level 3 sex offender and the legal requirements for him to appear at the office every 90 days and update his photo if he is released and resides in NYC.
Notification regarding an attached PDF for an Order filed under seal in case 19-mc-179.
Please see the attached PDF for an Order that was filed under seal today in 19-mc-179.
Reiter informs the victim's father that Epstein turned himself in on state charges, but expresses dissatisfaction with the state indictment. He explicitly states he has referred the matter to the FBI to investigate potential federal law violations.
Stated he was followed aggressively by a private investigator.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity