This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving a dispute between defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca and prosecutor Ms. Comey regarding a response to a jury note. The jury requested an 'FBI deposition 3505-005' referenced during the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The defense attempted to include testimony from Special Agent Jason Richards in the response, but the Court overruled the request, deeming it unresponsive to the jury's specific ask.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Carolyn | Witness/Victim |
Subject of a jury note regarding her cross-examination and an FBI deposition.
|
| Jason Richards | Special Agent (FBI) |
Defense attorney requested his testimony be added to a response to the jury; request overruled.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Defense Attorney |
Argues for the inclusion of Agent Richards' testimony in response to a jury note.
|
| Ms. Comey | Prosecutor |
Argues against the inclusion of Agent Richards' testimony, stating it is not responsive to the note.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presides over the discussion, reads the jury note, and overrules the defense's request.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| FBI |
Mentioned in relation to Special Agent Jason Richards and 'FBI deposition 3505-005'.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting service listed in footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by document stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
"We would like the FBI deposition 3505-005 referred to by the defense during the cross-examination of Carolyn."Source
"I don't see how Agent Richards' testimony is in any way responsive to that note."Source
"Overruled. Because it's not what they've asked for."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,196 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document