DOJ-OGR-00014665.jpg

508 KB

Extraction Summary

5
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 508 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving a dispute between defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca and prosecutor Ms. Comey regarding a response to a jury note. The jury requested an 'FBI deposition 3505-005' referenced during the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The defense attempted to include testimony from Special Agent Jason Richards in the response, but the Court overruled the request, deeming it unresponsive to the jury's specific ask.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Carolyn Witness/Victim
Subject of a jury note regarding her cross-examination and an FBI deposition.
Jason Richards Special Agent (FBI)
Defense attorney requested his testimony be added to a response to the jury; request overruled.
Mr. Pagliuca Defense Attorney
Argues for the inclusion of Agent Richards' testimony in response to a jury note.
Ms. Comey Prosecutor
Argues against the inclusion of Agent Richards' testimony, stating it is not responsive to the note.
The Court Judge
Presides over the discussion, reads the jury note, and overrules the defense's request.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
FBI
Mentioned in relation to Special Agent Jason Richards and 'FBI deposition 3505-005'.
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Court reporting service listed in footer.
DOJ
Department of Justice (implied by document stamp DOJ-OGR).

Timeline (1 events)

Unknown (Trial proceedings)
Legal sidebar/conference regarding a response to a jury question concerning witness Carolyn and an FBI deposition document.
Courtroom (Southern District of NY)

Relationships (2)

Carolyn Adversarial/Legal Defense
Reference to 'cross-examination of Carolyn' by the defense.
Jason Richards Employment FBI
Referred to as 'Special Agent Jason Richards'.

Key Quotes (3)

"We would like the FBI deposition 3505-005 referred to by the defense during the cross-examination of Carolyn."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014665.jpg
Quote #1
"I don't see how Agent Richards' testimony is in any way responsive to that note."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014665.jpg
Quote #2
"Overruled. Because it's not what they've asked for."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014665.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,196 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 769 Filed 08/10/22 Page 7 of 19 3098
LCLVMAXT
1 addition to the name Carolyn, we add "and the testimony of
2 Special Agent Jason Richards," assuming that's appropriately
3 responsive to the question.
4 THE COURT: I don't think it is, remembering fondly
5 when I said "period."
6 MR. PAGLIUCA: I understand, your Honor.
7 THE COURT: "We would like the FBI deposition 3505-005
8 referred to by the defense during the cross-examination of
9 Carolyn."
10 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, I don't see how Agent
11 Richards' testimony is in any way responsive to that note. I
12 think the response that the Court already gave is fully
13 responsive.
14 THE COURT: It is.
15 MR. PAGLIUCA: My request stands, your Honor, we add
16 Special Agent Jason Richards to that.
17 THE COURT: Understood.
18 Overruled. Because it's not what they've asked for.
19 But we can be prepared, should they follow up with that
20 request.
21 MR. PAGLIUCA: We have the transcript here, your
22 Honor.
23 THE COURT: I am reading the notes verbatim, but I
24 will work on redacting the foreperson's name so they can be
25 made public.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014665

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document