Trove
Sign In Sign Up

EFTA00018651.pdf

83 KB
← Back to List View Original

Extraction Summary

5
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email thread
File Size: 83 KB
Summary

This document is an email thread between the SDNY US Attorney's Office and the FBI in late November 2018, triggered by the Miami Herald's 'Perversion of Justice' series. The officials discuss opening an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, explicitly stating 'It's trafficking' and determining that the Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) has 'legally... none' effect on their ability to prosecute in New York. They arrange a call to 'determine the way forward' and discuss Statute of Limitations (SOL) issues, referencing the Cosby case.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Kim Assistant United States Attorney
SDNY prosecutor involved in the discussion; cannot make the 3:30 meeting.
[Redacted] A. FBI Agent (NY)
Gathered information on the Epstein matter and suggested a call to determine the way forward.
Jeff Epstein Subject
Subject of the 'matter' being discussed; referenced in Miami Herald article.
[Redacted] (Human Trafficking Co-Coordinator) Assistant United States Attorney
Initiated the thread by sharing the Miami Herald article; believes the case is trafficking.
Bill Cosby Reference
Referenced regarding Statute of Limitations (SOL) discussions.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
USANYS
United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY)
FBI
Federal Bureau of Investigation (NY Field Office)
Miami Herald
Source of the article that triggered the discussion.

Timeline (2 events)

2001-07
Date mentioned in email text 'July 2001', possibly referring to an event relevant to the SOL discussion.
Unknown
View
2018-11-30
Internal SDNY/FBI discussion regarding opening an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein following Miami Herald reporting.
New York
SDNY AUSAs FBI NY Agents
View

Locations (2)

Location Context
Southern District of New York
Jurisdiction of the prosecutors
Florida
Location of the NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement)

Relationships (2)

Kim → Professional → FBI Agent
Colleagues coordinating on a legal case via email.
Jeff Epstein → Subject of Interest → USANYS
USANYS discussing opening an investigation into Epstein.

Key Quotes (5)

"We've been able to gather some information on the Jeff Epstein matter and I'd suggest we have a call to determine the way forward."
Source
EFTA00018651.pdf
Quote #1
"including what effect (if any) the Florida NPA has on us (legally it turns out none)."
Source
EFTA00018651.pdf
Quote #2
"I think we should be on this. It's trafficking."
Source
EFTA00018651.pdf
Quote #3
"Remind me of what we said regarding SOL in Cosby?"
Source
EFTA00018651.pdf
Quote #4
"Have any insight? From the article is sounds like he cooperated in a financial fraud case and was non-prosd."
Source
EFTA00018651.pdf
Quote #5

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,491 characters)

From: [Redacted]
To: [Redacted]
Subject: Re: FW: RE:
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 19:31:17 +0000
Importance: Normal
Ok
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 30, 2018, at 2:11 PM, [Redacted] > wrote:
July 2001. Talked to [Redacted] briefly before coming here. I can't join the 3:30 but keep me posted!
[Redacted] Kim
Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
212-637-2038
On Nov 30, 2018, at 1:56 PM, [Redacted] wrote:
Agreed. Remind me of what we said regarding SOL in Cosby?
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 30, 2018, at 1:52 PM, [Redacted] wrote:
I think we should be on this. It's trafficking.
From: [Redacted] (USANYS)
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2018 1:44 PM
To: [Redacted]; [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: FW: RE:
Hey guys,
We've had a bunch of discussions with brass in last day about this and assigned [Redacted] to look at things, including what effect (if any) the Florida NPA has on us (legally it turns out none). Meant to loop you in today – let's also chat separately.
From: [Redacted], [Redacted] (USANYS)
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2018 1:39 PM
To: [Redacted], [Redacted] A. (NY) (FBI) < [Redacted] >
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) < [Redacted] >; [Redacted] (USANYS) < [Redacted] >; [Redacted], [Redacted] A. (NY) (FBI) < [Redacted] >
Subject: Re: RE:
Either of those times work for me. [Redacted] and I have a meeting at 2 so 3:30 would be better if possible.
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 30, 2018, at 1:35 PM, [Redacted], [Redacted] A. (NY) (FBI) < [Redacted] > wrote:
All,
We've been able to gather some information on the Jeff Epstein matter and I'd suggest we have a call to determine the way forward. Does 3:00 or 3:30 today work?
From: [Redacted], [Redacted] A. (NY) (FBI)
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2018 4:40 PM
To: [Redacted], [Redacted] A. (NY) (FBI) < [Redacted] >
Subject: FW:
From: [Redacted], [Redacted] (USANYS) [mailto:[Redacted]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2018 1:36 PM
To: [Redacted], [Redacted] A. (NY) (FBI) < [Redacted] >
Cc: Kim, [Redacted] (USANYS) 4 < [Redacted] >
Subject: [Redacted]
[Redacted],
Have you seen this article?
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article220097825.html
Have any insight? From the article is sounds like he cooperated in a financial fraud case and was non-prosd.
[Redacted] and I can chat whenever.
Thanks,
[Redacted]
[Redacted], [Redacted]
Assistant United States Attorney
Human Trafficking Co-Coordinator
Violent & Organized Crime
Southern District of New York
[Redacted]
View Original PDF

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document