DOJ-OGR-00002937.jpg
858 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing (table of contents)
File Size:
858 KB
Summary
This document is a Table of Contents (page ii) for a legal filing by the Department of Justice in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on April 16, 2021. It outlines arguments against the defendant's motions to suppress evidence, asserting that Fourth and Fifth Amendment claims fail and that the government acted in good faith. The document also outlines a section arguing that a jury should decide whether Maxwell committed perjury, specifically referencing depositions from April and July 2016.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of suppression motions, perjury allegations, and depositions mentioned in the TOC.
|
| Chief Judge McMahon | Judge |
Mentioned regarding a 'Memorandum and Order'.
|
| Magistrate Judge Netburn | Judge |
Mentioned regarding an 'Order'.
|
| Martindell | Legal Precedent Name |
Referenced in legal argument 'Martindell Provides No Basis to Grant the Relief the Defendant Seeks' (referring to Uni...
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| New York Daily News |
Mentioned as the source of an article.
|
|
| The Government |
The prosecution/DOJ, arguing against the defendant's motions (e.g., 'The Government Acted in Good Faith').
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (indicated in footer DOJ-OGR-00002937).
|
Timeline (3 events)
Relationships (1)
Legal filing where The Government argues against Maxwell's motions to suppress evidence.
Key Quotes (5)
"The Defendant’s Suppression Motion Should Be Denied"Source
DOJ-OGR-00002937.jpg
Quote #1
"Maxwell’s Fourth Amendment Claim Fails"Source
DOJ-OGR-00002937.jpg
Quote #2
"The Government Acted in Good Faith"Source
DOJ-OGR-00002937.jpg
Quote #3
"The Jury Should Decide Whether the Defendant Committed Perjury"Source
DOJ-OGR-00002937.jpg
Quote #4
"The Defendant Is Not Entitled to a Hearing"Source
DOJ-OGR-00002937.jpg
Quote #5
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (5,384 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 Filed 04/16/21 Page 3 of 239
c. Chief Judge McMahon’s Memorandum and Order ........................................................ 71
7. Magistrate Judge Netburn’s Order ................................................................................... 74
8. Unsealing of Maxwell’s Depositions .............................................................................. 74
9. The New York Daily News Article ................................................................................... 75
B. The Defendant’s Suppression Motion Should Be Denied ...................................................... 76
1. Martindell Provides No Basis to Grant the Relief the Defendant Seeks............................. 76
a. Applicable Law .................................................................................................................... 76
b. Discussion ........................................................................................................................... 79
2. Maxwell’s Fourth Amendment Claim Fails ........................................................................ 82
a. Maxwell Has Not Established Standing............................................................................... 82
i. Applicable Law................................................................................................................. 82
ii. Discussion.......................................................................................................................... 84
b. The Government Acted in Good Faith................................................................................ 86
i. Applicable Law................................................................................................................. 86
ii. Discussion.......................................................................................................................... 88
c. Suppression of Certain Materials Would Be Improper Under the Inevitable Discovery
Doctrine................................................................................................................................... 93
i. Applicable Law................................................................................................................. 93
ii. Discussion.......................................................................................................................... 94
3. The Defendant’s Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained Pursuant to the Subpoena
Under the Fifth Amendment Is Without Merit ..................................................................... 96
a. Applicable Law .................................................................................................................... 96
i. The Fifth Amendment – Generally................................................................................... 96
ii. The Fifth Amendment – Act of Production Privilege........................................................ 97
iii. The Fifth Amendment – When Private Action Is Deemed Government Action ...... 98
b. Discussion ........................................................................................................................... 99
4. The Government Did Not Violate Maxwell’s Due Process Rights...................................... 103
a. Applicable Law .................................................................................................................. 104
b. Discussion ........................................................................................................................... 107
5. The Court Should Not Exercise Its Inherent Authority to Order Suppression..................... 109
a. Applicable Law .................................................................................................................. 109
b. Discussion ........................................................................................................................... 110
6. The Defendant Is Not Entitled to a Hearing ....................................................................... 111
a. Applicable Law .................................................................................................................. 112
b. Discussion ........................................................................................................................... 115
7. Magistrate Judge Netburn’s Order ................................................................................... 74
8. Unsealing of Maxwell’s Depositions .............................................................................. 74
9. The New York Daily News Article ................................................................................... 75
B. The Defendant’s Suppression Motion Should Be Denied ...................................................... 76
1. Martindell Provides No Basis to Grant the Relief the Defendant Seeks............................. 76
a. Applicable Law .................................................................................................................... 76
b. Discussion ........................................................................................................................... 79
2. Maxwell’s Fourth Amendment Claim Fails ........................................................................ 82
a. Maxwell Has Not Established Standing............................................................................... 82
i. Applicable Law................................................................................................................. 82
ii. Discussion.......................................................................................................................... 84
b. The Government Acted in Good Faith................................................................................ 86
i. Applicable Law................................................................................................................. 86
ii. Discussion.......................................................................................................................... 88
c. Suppression of Certain Materials Would Be Improper Under the Inevitable Discovery
Doctrine................................................................................................................................... 93
i. Applicable Law................................................................................................................. 93
ii. Discussion.......................................................................................................................... 94
3. The Defendant’s Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained Pursuant to the Subpoena
Under the Fifth Amendment Is Without Merit ..................................................................... 96
a. Applicable Law .................................................................................................................... 96
i. The Fifth Amendment – Generally................................................................................... 96
ii. The Fifth Amendment – Act of Production Privilege........................................................ 97
iii. The Fifth Amendment – When Private Action Is Deemed Government Action ...... 98
b. Discussion ........................................................................................................................... 99
4. The Government Did Not Violate Maxwell’s Due Process Rights...................................... 103
a. Applicable Law .................................................................................................................. 104
b. Discussion ........................................................................................................................... 107
5. The Court Should Not Exercise Its Inherent Authority to Order Suppression..................... 109
a. Applicable Law .................................................................................................................. 109
b. Discussion ........................................................................................................................... 110
6. The Defendant Is Not Entitled to a Hearing ....................................................................... 111
a. Applicable Law .................................................................................................................. 112
b. Discussion ........................................................................................................................... 115
V. The Jury Should Decide Whether the Defendant Committed Perjury................................. 116
A. Factual Background ............................................................................................................ 117
B. Applicable Law.................................................................................................................... 119
C. Discussion............................................................................................................................ 122
1. April 2016 Deposition ..................................................................................................... 123
2. July 2016 Deposition....................................................................................................... 129
3. Materiality ....................................................................................................................... 135
A. Factual Background ............................................................................................................ 117
B. Applicable Law.................................................................................................................... 119
C. Discussion............................................................................................................................ 122
1. April 2016 Deposition ..................................................................................................... 123
2. July 2016 Deposition....................................................................................................... 129
3. Materiality ....................................................................................................................... 135
ii
DOJ-OGR-00002937
DOJ-OGR-00002937
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document