Epstein_Part_02_(Redacted).pdf
70.8 MB
Extraction Summary
8
People
2
Organizations
3
Locations
5
Events
6
Relationships
9
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Letter
File Size:
70.8 MB
Summary
This document is a letter dated June 22, 2006, from attorney Jack A. Goldberger of Atterbury Goldberger Richardson & Weiss, P.A., to Barry Krischer of the Florida State Attorney's Office, concerning Jeffrey Epstein. The letter argues for no charges against Epstein, emphasizing that no sex was alleged or occurred, and discrediting the alleged victim based on her changing age, suggestive photos, and other behavioral issues. It also references previous communications and meetings regarding the case.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Lanna Belohlavek | Esquire |
Recipient of mail, attended meeting on June 14, 2006, cc'd on letter
|
| Barry Krischer | Florida State Attorney's Office |
Recipient of letter
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Client |
Subject of the letter, not explicitly named as 'client' but implied by 'Re:' and the content of the letter. The lette...
|
| Joseph R. Atterbury | Board Certified Criminal Trial Attorney |
Associated with Atterbury Goldberger Richardson & Weiss, P.A.
|
| Jack A. Goldberger | Signatory of letter, Board Certified Criminal Trial Attorney |
Associated with Atterbury Goldberger Richardson & Weiss, P.A.
|
| Scott N. Richardson |
Associated with Atterbury Goldberger Richardson & Weiss, P.A.
|
|
| Jason S. Weiss |
Associated with Atterbury Goldberger Richardson & Weiss, P.A.
|
|
| George Slattery | Polygraph expert |
Hired by the client's legal team
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Atterbury Goldberger Richardson & Weiss, P.A. |
Law firm sending the letter
|
|
| Florida State Attorney's Office |
Recipient organization of the letter
|
Timeline (5 events)
2006-06-01
Meeting where it was revealed that the allegation did not involve actual sex.
2006-06-05
Previous letter sent by the law firm regarding the case.
Atterbury Goldberger Richardson & Weiss, P.A.
Barry Krischer (implied)
2006-06-14
Meeting between the law firm (implied Goldberger) and Lanna Belohlavek.
Jack A. Goldberger (implied)
Lanna Belohlavek
2006-06-22
Letter written by Jack A. Goldberger on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein to Barry Krischer.
West Palm Beach, Florida
Hiring of George Slattery, a polygraph expert, to confirm client's position of no sex and girl's age.
Locations (3)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of law firm and State Attorney's Office
|
|
|
250 Australian Avenue South, One Clearlake Centre, Suite 1400
|
Address of Atterbury Goldberger Richardson & Weiss, P.A.
|
|
Address of Florida State Attorney's Office
|
Relationships (6)
Goldberger writes the letter on behalf of 'my client' Jeffrey Epstein.
Goldberger sends a letter to Krischer.
Goldberger mentions meeting Lanna on June 14, 2006, and Lanna is cc'd on the letter.
The letter details an interaction where the girl provided a topless massage and received money from Epstein.
Girl (alleged victim)
→
Family
→
Parents of girl
One of her parents contacted the police.
Girl (alleged victim)
→
Family
→
Twin sister of girl
The girl stated she wanted to bring her twin sister along next time.
Key Quotes (9)
""I write to you to confirm our meeting with Lanna on June 14, 2006. It is our hope that in light of the recent developments in this case which we have set forth in our letter of June 5, 2006, our meetings, and herein, in particular the fact that there is no sex alleged, this case can be disposed of with, at most, an informal agreement, or more appropriately, no charges being filed at all.""Source
Epstein_Part_02_(Redacted).pdf
Quote #1
""As you know, it was only at the June 1, 2006 meeting, after eight months of investigation, that you and I both learned, for the very first time, and I believe to our collective disbelief, that the allegation of the girl did not raise the slightest hint of actual sex.""Source
Epstein_Part_02_(Redacted).pdf
Quote #2
""In fact, as you are aware, it was with this in mind that we hired George Slattery, a highly respected polygraph expert, who unequivocally confirmed our client's long held position both that there was no sex and that the girl clearly stated she was 18 years old.""Source
Epstein_Part_02_(Redacted).pdf
Quote #3
""Since, we now know with certainty that there are in fact no allegations of sex, and no sex occurred between my client and this girl, I would ask you to consider your previous statements to the effect that you would not bring a "touching case" - NO sex, NO charge - in fashioning an appropriate resolution to this matter.""Source
Epstein_Part_02_(Redacted).pdf
Quote #4
""As we have discussed many times, the girl's credibility is highly questionable and has been severely undermined by her actions over the past few months in: (1) repeatedly changing her age on her web page (first 17, then 16, then 15) and posting graphic nude and suggestive photographs of herself; (2) boasting about shoplifting, underage drinking, smoking, and having sex; (3) being observed by the police as clearly on drugs; and, (5) running away to an unsafe drug location.""Source
Epstein_Part_02_(Redacted).pdf
Quote #5
""...the agreed to facts of this case are that: (1) this girl, was driven to my clients' home with the express and sole purpose of providing a topless massage; (2) she told my client she was 18 years old; (3) she received her agreed upon two hundred dollars; (4) before leaving she wrote down her phone number and stated next time she wanted to bring her twin sister along; (5) my client never saw her again; and, most importantly (6) no sex occurred.""Source
Epstein_Part_02_(Redacted).pdf
Quote #6
""It was only several MONTHS later, that we are led to believe, one of her parents, both of whom have criminal records for fraud, contacted the police.""Source
Epstein_Part_02_(Redacted).pdf
Quote #7
""Finally, as you consider your options, I quite frankly think it unfair to give much weight to the pressure being brought to bear by law enforcement.""Source
Epstein_Part_02_(Redacted).pdf
Quote #8
""With all this in mind, I believe that it is only just, especially now that we are both certain there was no sex involved, that your office opt NOT to prosecute this case.""Source
Epstein_Part_02_(Redacted).pdf
Quote #9
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (7,274 characters)
ATTERBURY GOLDBERGER AG
RICHARDSON & WEISS, P.A. RW
RICHARDSON & WEISS, P.A. RW
WEST PALM BEACH
FL 33401
$0.630 $0.630 $0.630
$0.630 METER
FL 33401
$0.630 $0.630 $0.630
$0.630 METER
5945979
'06 AUG 11 PM
Lanna Belohlavek, Esquire
State Attorney's Office
401 North Dixie Highway
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
State Attorney's Office
401 North Dixie Highway
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
33401+4209-01 C021
.......................................................................
07/26/17
Page 1 of 131
Public Records Request No.: 17-295
ATTERBURY GOLDBERGER AG
RICHARDSON & WEISS, P.A. RW
RICHARDSON & WEISS, P.A. RW
JOSEPH R. ATTERBURY *
JACK A. GOLDBERGER**
SCOTT N. RICHARDSON*
JASON S. WEISS
JACK A. GOLDBERGER**
SCOTT N. RICHARDSON*
JASON S. WEISS
*BOARD CERTIFIED CRIMINAL TRIAL ATTORNEY
†MEMBER OF NEW JERSEY & FLORIDA BARS
†MEMBER OF NEW JERSEY & FLORIDA BARS
June 22, 2006
Barry Krischer
Florida State Attorney's Office
401 North Dixie Highway
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Florida State Attorney's Office
401 North Dixie Highway
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Re: Jeffrey Epstein
Dear Mr. Krischer:
I write to you to confirm our meeting with Lanna on June 14, 2006. It is our hope
that in light of the recent developments in this case which we have set forth in our letter
of June 5, 2006, our meetings, and herein, in particular the fact that there is no sex
alleged, this case can be disposed of with, at most, an informal agreement, or more
appropriately, no charges being filed at all.
that in light of the recent developments in this case which we have set forth in our letter
of June 5, 2006, our meetings, and herein, in particular the fact that there is no sex
alleged, this case can be disposed of with, at most, an informal agreement, or more
appropriately, no charges being filed at all.
As you know, it was only at the June 1, 2006 meeting, after eight months of
investigation, that you and I both learned, for the very first time, and I believe to our
collective disbelief, that the allegation of the girl did not raise the slightest hint of actual
sex. Up until that point, we had all been laboring under the assumption this girl had
alleged multiple sexual encounters with my client. In fact, as you are aware, it was with
this in mind that we hired George Slattery, a highly respected polygraph expert, who
unequivocally confirmed our client's long held position both that there was no sex and
that the girl clearly stated she was 18 years old. Since, we now know with certainty that
there are in fact no allegations of sex, and no sex occurred between my client and this
girl, I would ask you to consider your previous statements to the effect that you would not
bring a "touching case" - NO sex, NO charge - in fashioning an appropriate resolution to
this matter.
investigation, that you and I both learned, for the very first time, and I believe to our
collective disbelief, that the allegation of the girl did not raise the slightest hint of actual
sex. Up until that point, we had all been laboring under the assumption this girl had
alleged multiple sexual encounters with my client. In fact, as you are aware, it was with
this in mind that we hired George Slattery, a highly respected polygraph expert, who
unequivocally confirmed our client's long held position both that there was no sex and
that the girl clearly stated she was 18 years old. Since, we now know with certainty that
there are in fact no allegations of sex, and no sex occurred between my client and this
girl, I would ask you to consider your previous statements to the effect that you would not
bring a "touching case" - NO sex, NO charge - in fashioning an appropriate resolution to
this matter.
As we have discussed many times, the girl's credibility is highly questionable and
has been severely undermined by her actions over the past few months in: (1) repeatedly
changing her age on her web page (first 17, then 16, then 15) and posting graphic nude
and suggestive photographs of herself; (2) boasting about shoplifting, underage drinking,
has been severely undermined by her actions over the past few months in: (1) repeatedly
changing her age on her web page (first 17, then 16, then 15) and posting graphic nude
and suggestive photographs of herself; (2) boasting about shoplifting, underage drinking,
250 Australian Avenue South, One Clearlake Centre, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401
07/26/17
Page 2 of 131
Telephone: 561.659.8000 Facsimile: 561.835.8691
Public Records Request No.: 17-295
Page 3 of 131
smoking, and having sex; (3) being observed by the police as clearly on drugs; and, (5)
running away to an unsafe drug location. With this background, it has certainly taken a
while to sort things out, but, the agreed to facts of this case are that: (1) this girl, was
driven to my clients' home with the express and sole purpose of providing a topless
massage; (2) she told my client she was 18 years old; (3) she received her agreed upon
two hundred dollars; (4) before leaving she wrote down her phone number and stated next
time she wanted to bring her twin sister along; (5) my client never saw her again; and,
most importantly (6) no sex occurred. It was only several MONTHS later, that we are led
to believe, one of her parents, both of whom have criminal records for fraud, contacted
the police.
running away to an unsafe drug location. With this background, it has certainly taken a
while to sort things out, but, the agreed to facts of this case are that: (1) this girl, was
driven to my clients' home with the express and sole purpose of providing a topless
massage; (2) she told my client she was 18 years old; (3) she received her agreed upon
two hundred dollars; (4) before leaving she wrote down her phone number and stated next
time she wanted to bring her twin sister along; (5) my client never saw her again; and,
most importantly (6) no sex occurred. It was only several MONTHS later, that we are led
to believe, one of her parents, both of whom have criminal records for fraud, contacted
the police.
Finally, as you consider your options, I quite frankly think it unfair to give much
weight to the pressure being brought to bear by law enforcement. Their comments which
have been brought to my attention certainly indicate, at a minimum, a lack of objectivity.
With all this in mind, I believe that it is only just, especially now that we are both certain
there was no sex involved, that your office opt NOT to prosecute this case. However,
given the totality of the circumstances, coupled with the fact that a "Google search" is
now a "forever" reference on any job application, I believe that the girls involved, my
client, and all concerned would be better served with at worst an informal resolution of
this matter. Certainly it seems preferable to filing a charge that we all currently concede
would likely not succeed if brought to trial. I appreciate the personal attention you have
given to this matter, and look forward to you response.
weight to the pressure being brought to bear by law enforcement. Their comments which
have been brought to my attention certainly indicate, at a minimum, a lack of objectivity.
With all this in mind, I believe that it is only just, especially now that we are both certain
there was no sex involved, that your office opt NOT to prosecute this case. However,
given the totality of the circumstances, coupled with the fact that a "Google search" is
now a "forever" reference on any job application, I believe that the girls involved, my
client, and all concerned would be better served with at worst an informal resolution of
this matter. Certainly it seems preferable to filing a charge that we all currently concede
would likely not succeed if brought to trial. I appreciate the personal attention you have
given to this matter, and look forward to you response.
Very truly yours,
JACK A. GOLDBERGER
cc: Lanna Belohlavek, Esquire
07/26/17
Public Records Request No.: 17-295
ATTERBURY GOLDBERGER AG
RICHARDSON & WEISS, P.A. RW
RICHARDSON & WEISS, P.A. RW
WEST PALM BEACH
FL 33401
$0.390 $0.390 $0.390
$0.390 METER
FL 33401
$0.390 $0.390 $0.390
$0.390 METER
JUN 22 06
3843979
'06 JUN 23 PM 12:09
Lanna Belohlavek, Esquire
Office of the State Attorney
401 North Dixie Highway
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Office of the State Attorney
401 North Dixie Highway
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
33401+4209-01 C021
.......................................................................
07/26/17
Page 4 of 131
Public Records Request No.: 17-295
ATTERBURY GOLDBERGER AG
RICHARDSON & WEISS, P.A. RW
RICHARDSON & WEISS, P.A. RW
JOSEPH R. ATTERBURY *
JACK A. GOLDBERGER**
SCOTT N. RICHARDSON*
JASON S. WEISS
JACK A. GOLDBERGER**
SCOTT N. RICHARDSON*
JASON S. WEISS
*BOARD CERTIFIED CRIMINAL TRIAL ATTORNEY
†MEMBER OF NEW JERSEY & FLORIDA BARS
†MEMBER OF NEW JERSEY & FLORIDA BARS
June 22, 2006
Barry Krischer
Florida State Attorney's Office
401 North Dixie Highway
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Florida State Attorney's Office
401 North Dixie Highway
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Re: Jeffrey Epstein
Dear Mr. Krischer:
I write to you to confirm our meeting with Lanna on June 14, 2006. It is our hope
that in light of the recent developments in this case which we have set forth in our letter
of June 5, 2006, our meetings, and herein, in particular the fact that there is no sex
alleged, this case can be disposed of with, at most, an informal agreement, or more
appropriately, no charges being filed at all.
that in light of the recent developments in this case which we have set forth in our letter
of June 5, 2006, our meetings, and herein, in particular the fact that there is no sex
alleged, this case can be disposed of with, at most, an informal agreement, or more
appropriately, no charges being filed at all.
As you know, it was only at the June 1, 2006 meeting, after eight months of
investigation, that you and I both learned, for the very first time, and I believe to our
collective disbelief, that the allegation of the girl did not raise the slightest hint of actual
sex. Up until that point, we had all been laboring under the assumption this girl had
alleged multiple sexual encounters with my client. In fact, as you are aware, it was with
this in mind that we hired George Slattery, a highly respected polygraph expert, who
unequivocally confirmed our client's long held position both that there was no sex and
that the girl clearly stated she was 18 years old. Since, we now know with certainty that
there are in fact no allegations of sex, and no sex occurred between my client and this
girl, I would ask you to consider your previous statements to the effect that you would not
bring a "touching case" - NO sex, NO charge - in fashioning an appropriate resolution to
this matter.
investigation, that you and I both learned, for the very first time, and I believe to our
collective disbelief, that the allegation of the girl did not raise the slightest hint of actual
sex. Up until that point, we had all been laboring under the assumption this girl had
alleged multiple sexual encounters with my client. In fact, as you are aware, it was with
this in mind that we hired George Slattery, a highly respected polygraph expert, who
unequivocally confirmed our client's long held position both that there was no sex and
that the girl clearly stated she was 18 years old. Since, we now know with certainty that
there are in fact no allegations of sex, and no sex occurred between my client and this
girl, I would ask you to consider your previous statements to the effect that you would not
bring a "touching case" - NO sex, NO charge - in fashioning an appropriate resolution to
this matter.
As we have discussed many times, the girl's credibility is highly questionable and
has been severely undermined by her actions over the past few months in: (1) repeatedly
changing her age on her web page (first 17, then 16, then 15) and posting graphic nude
and suggestive photographs of herself; (2) boasting about shoplifting, underage drinking,
has been severely undermined by her actions over the past few months in: (1) repeatedly
changing her age on her web page (first 17, then 16, then 15) and posting graphic nude
and suggestive photographs of herself; (2) boasting about shoplifting, underage drinking,
250 Australian Avenue South, One Clearlake Centre, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401
07/26/17
Page 5 of 131
Telephone: 561.659.8000 Facsimile: 561.835.8691
Public Records Request No.: 17-295
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document