An email from Daniel Cundy (Blackfords LLP) dated August 9, 2020, providing legal reference materials following a phone call. The email attaches extracts regarding Financial Conduct Authority procedures and criminal law fraud procedures. The text discusses legal protections regarding compulsory powers in MLAT (Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty) requests, citing *United States v. Allen* and *Kastigar v. United States* (protection against self-incrimination).
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Daniel Cundy | Sender / Partner |
Partner at Blackfords LLP, sending legal reference materials regarding MLAT requests and self-incrimination protections.
|
| Gary Bloxsome | CC Recipient |
Copied on the email, presumably a colleague at Blackfords LLP.
|
| Jennifer Richardson | CC Recipient |
Copied on the email, presumably a colleague or associated counsel.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Blackfords LLP |
Law firm representing the sender.
|
|
| Financial Conduct Authority |
Source of the handbook extract (DEPP 7) attached to the email.
|
|
| Serious Fraud Office |
Mentioned in the context of compulsory powers and fraud procedure.
|
|
| Solicitors Regulation Authority |
Regulatory body mentioned in the footer.
|
|
| Chambers UK |
Awarding body in signature.
|
|
| Legal 500 |
Awarding body in signature.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of Blackfords LLP office.
|
|
|
Registered office location for Blackfords LLP.
|
|
|
Mentioned in case citations (United States v. Allen, Kastigar v. United States).
|
"This practice and approach resonates with the law as set out in United States v. Allen, 864 F.3d (2d Cir.2017)."Source
"We reiterate the protection at Article 7 (2) of the MLAT treaty although there is no need to attach it."Source
"limitations and protections on use when their compulsory powers are used in MLAT requests, an approach which reflects such cases as Kastigar v. United States"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (3,047 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document