This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. The text details a procedural discussion between the prosecution (represented by Ms. Moe and others) and the defense (Ms. Menninger) regarding the timeline for redacting government and defense exhibits. The Court agrees to allow the parties to resolve these redaction issues and an attorney-client privilege issue over the upcoming weekend.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Menninger | Defense Attorney |
Referenced by speaker regarding an email sent; later speaks regarding attorney-client privilege.
|
| Ms. Moe | Attorney (Government/Prosecution) |
Speaker addressing the Court.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the discussion regarding redactions and scheduling.
|
| Unnamed Speaker | Attorney (likely Government) |
Speaker in lines 1-19 arguing against urgency of redactions.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Transcription service provider listed in footer.
|
|
| Government |
Referenced as the prosecution side of the case.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied location of the court/reporters (likely SDNY).
|
"We don't understand the particular urgency with respect to these exhibits."Source
"I don't see the need for a fire drill redaction resolution this evening"Source
"We'll get all of that done this weekend."Source
"The attorney-client privilege issue."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,495 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document