DOJ-OGR-00013847.jpg

599 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 599 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. The text details a procedural discussion between the prosecution (represented by Ms. Moe and others) and the defense (Ms. Menninger) regarding the timeline for redacting government and defense exhibits. The Court agrees to allow the parties to resolve these redaction issues and an attorney-client privilege issue over the upcoming weekend.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Ms. Menninger Defense Attorney
Referenced by speaker regarding an email sent; later speaks regarding attorney-client privilege.
Ms. Moe Attorney (Government/Prosecution)
Speaker addressing the Court.
The Court Judge
Presiding over the discussion regarding redactions and scheduling.
Unnamed Speaker Attorney (likely Government)
Speaker in lines 1-19 arguing against urgency of redactions.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Transcription service provider listed in footer.
Government
Referenced as the prosecution side of the case.
DOJ
Department of Justice (implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR).

Timeline (2 events)

2022-08-10
Court hearing regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE)
Courtroom (Southern District)
The Court Ms. Menninger Ms. Moe Government Counsel
Upcoming Weekend
Planned resolution of pending redaction issues
N/A
Defense Government

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied location of the court/reporters (likely SDNY).

Relationships (2)

Ms. Menninger Adversarial/Legal The Government
Discussions regarding exhibits and opposing sides in court.
Ms. Moe Professional/Legal The Court
Ms. Moe addressing 'Your Honor'.

Key Quotes (4)

"We don't understand the particular urgency with respect to these exhibits."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00013847.jpg
Quote #1
"I don't see the need for a fire drill redaction resolution this evening"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00013847.jpg
Quote #2
"We'll get all of that done this weekend."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00013847.jpg
Quote #3
"The attorney-client privilege issue."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00013847.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,495 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 256 of 267 2284
LCAVMAX8
1 number of exhibits, both defense exhibits and government
2 exhibits, that need additional redactions. And we agreed over
3 the break we would work diligently to resolve the full slate of
4 pending redactions issues. We don't understand the particular
5 urgency with respect to these exhibits.
6 Ms. Menninger is right, that she did email the
7 government last night in the evening while, as the Court is
8 aware, we were tending to other matters. I don't understand
9 the particular urgency with respect to these exhibits. And
10 again, we conferred with the defense this morning to confirm
11 they would resolve all the pending redaction issues over the
12 weekend. That seems entirely reasonable, given how many
13 redaction issues we'll be resolving.
14 We're still waiting to hear from the defense on a
15 number of redactions and we'll work together on that issue. I
16 don't see the need for a fire drill redaction resolution this
17 evening; and so I think the proposal we discussed this morning
18 is reasonable. We're going to get those issued resolved in
19 full.
20 THE COURT: We'll get all of that done this weekend.
21 Thank you.
22 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.
23 THE COURT: The attorney-client privilege issue.
24 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I think we very well may
25 be able to reach some type of stipulation, as your Honor
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013847

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document