DOJ-OGR-00017217.jpg

592 KB

Extraction Summary

2
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
0
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript / jury instructions
File Size: 592 KB
Summary

This page contains a transcript of jury instructions from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The judge explains the legal distinction between conspiracy charges and substantive charges. The text specifically details Instruction No. 13 regarding Count Two, citing Title 18, United States Code, Section 2422, which defines the federal crime of enticement to engage in illegal sexual activity involving interstate travel.

People (2)

Name Role Context
The Defendant Accused
Referenced in instructions regarding conspiracy and substantive crimes (Implicitly Ghislaine Maxwell based on Case ID...
Judge/Court Presiding Authority
Speaker giving the instructions ('I'll instruct you shortly')

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Footer information
United States District Court
Implied by Case ID and 'Southern District'
Department of Justice (DOJ)
Referenced in Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR'

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
Filing of jury instructions (Charge) transcript
Southern District Court
Judge Jury Defendant

Locations (2)

Location Context
Jurisdiction mentioned in the statute citation
Court jurisdiction implied by reporter stamp

Key Quotes (3)

"Whoever knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any individual to travel in interstate commerce... to engage in any sexual activity... is guilty of a federal crime."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017217.jpg
Quote #1
"By contrast, the substantive counts require proof that the crime charge was actually committed, but do not require proof of an agreement."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017217.jpg
Quote #2
"Instruction No. 13. Count Two, enticement to engage in an illegal sexual activity, the statute."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017217.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,490 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 196 of 257 3030
LCKVMAX8 Charge
1 actually committed.
2 By contrast, the substantive counts require proof that
3 the crime charge was actually committed, but do not require
4 proof of an agreement. Of course, if a defendant both
5 participates in a conspiracy to commit a crime and then
6 actually commits that crime, that defendant may be guilty of
7 both the conspiracy and the substantive crime, as I'll instruct
8 you shortly.
9 We will turn first to the substantive charges in the
10 indictment, which are more convenient to consider before the
11 conspiracy charges. Therefore, I'll instruct you first on
12 Counts Two, Four, and Six, and then I'll instruct you on Counts
13 One, Three, and Five.
14 Instruction No. 13. Count Two, enticement to engage
15 in an illegal sexual activity, the statute.
16 The relevant statute for Count Two is Title 18, United
17 States Code, Section 2422, which provides that: "Whoever
18 knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any
19 individual to travel in interstate commerce or in any territory
20 or possession of the United States to engage in any sexual
21 activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal
22 offense" is guilty of a federal crime.
23 Instruction No. 14. Count Two, enticement to engage
24 in illegal sexual activity, the elements.
25 To prove the defendant guilty of Count Two, the
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017217

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document