| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-01 | N/A | Court hearing regarding bond/bail for Ghislaine Maxwell. | Southern District (likely NY) | View |
This page contains a transcript of jury instructions from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The judge explains the legal distinction between conspiracy charges and substantive charges. The text specifically details Instruction No. 13 regarding Count Two, citing Title 18, United States Code, Section 2422, which defines the federal crime of enticement to engage in illegal sexual activity involving interstate travel.
This document is a page from a character reference letter submitted by Kevin Maxwell on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell ahead of her sentencing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The letter highlights her empathy and work in ocean conservation, urging the judge to weigh her 'lifetime good character' against the gravity of her offenses.
This document is a page from the court transcript of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains jury instructions regarding the admissibility and limited use of 'similar acts' evidence. The judge instructs the jury that such evidence cannot be used to prove bad character, but may be used to determine intent, lack of mistake, or the existence of a common scheme or plan.
This document is page 213 of 257 from the court transcript (Document 767) filed on August 10, 2022, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains Jury Instruction No. 33 regarding Counts One, Three, and Five, specifically defining the legal elements of 'Conspiracy to violate federal law.' The text explains that a conspiracy requires an agreement between two or more persons to commit an unlawful act and at least one overt act, regardless of the conspiracy's ultimate success.
This page contains jury instructions (Instruction No. 20) from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell regarding Count Four of the indictment. The judge explains the legal definition of 'transportation of an individual under the age of 17 to engage in illegal sexual activity,' specifically relating to a victim identified as 'Jane' during the period of 1994 to 1997. The text clarifies that the government must prove Maxwell knowingly facilitated this travel, such as by purchasing tickets, even if she did not personally transport the victim across state lines.
This document is Page 4 of a court filing (Document 367-1) from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 22, 2021. It outlines proposed 'Voir Dire' (jury selection) questions focused on determining if potential jurors have been biased by pretrial publicity regarding Maxwell or Jeffrey Epstein. The document includes sidebar annotations showing a legal dispute where the Government objects to specific questions as repetitive or inappropriate, while the Defense argues they are necessary to ensure an impartial jury, citing case law such as *United States v. Tsarnaev*.
Notification if an inmate is receiving medication that may alter courtroom behavior.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity