HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011805.jpg

2.45 MB

Extraction Summary

7
People
3
Organizations
5
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Book manuscript / memoir page (evidence file)
File Size: 2.45 MB
Summary

This document appears to be a page from a memoir or manuscript (likely by Ehud Barak) contained within House Oversight files. It details diplomatic negotiations between Israel and Syria mediated by US President Bill Clinton, specifically discussing the negative impact of press leaks in 'Ha'aretz' and an Arabic newspaper. The text describes a February meeting in Jerusalem where the narrator, Danny Yatom, and US Ambassador Martin Indyk drew up a specific border proposal regarding the Golan Heights and the Sea of Galilee.

People (7)

Name Role Context
Unknown Narrator (Implied Ehud Barak) Author/Negotiator
Discussing negotiations with Clinton and Syria; denoted by 'I' and header '/ BARAK /'
Bill Clinton US President
Mediator between Israel and Syria; phoned Assad and the narrator
Hafez al-Assad President of Syria
Referred to as 'Assad'; described as a strongman with failing health
Yitzhak Rabin Former Israeli Prime Minister
Mentioned regarding his 'pocket deposit' (previous diplomatic commitment)
Farouk Al-Sharaa Syrian Official (Foreign Minister)
Syrian negotiator whom Assad refused to send back for talks
Danny Yatom Israeli Official
Sat down with the narrator to draw up proposals
Martin Indyk US Ambassador
Participated in the February meeting in Jerusalem to draw borders

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Ha'aretz
Israeli newspaper that leaked the US negotiating paper
Arabic-language newspaper in London
Published a leak presumably from the Syrians
US Government
Mediators (Clinton, Indyk)

Timeline (2 events)

February
Strategic meeting to draw border lines on a satellite map
Jerusalem
Unknown
Leaks regarding negotiations published in an Arabic newspaper in London and Ha'aretz
London / Israel

Locations (5)

Location Context
Location of the newspaper that published the first leak
Location where the narrator returned to and held meetings
Meeting location with Danny Yatom and Martin Indyk
Territory under negotiation
Geographic landmark used for drawing proposed borders

Relationships (3)

Narrator (Barak) Diplomatic/Collaborative Bill Clinton
Working together on peace negotiations and strategy.
Hafez al-Assad Superior/Subordinate Farouk Al-Sharaa
Assad refused to send Al-Sharaa back for talks.
Narrator (Barak) Professional/Advisory Danny Yatom
Worked together on mapping the Golan withdrawal proposal.

Key Quotes (4)

"I agreed with President Clinton that when they ended, he could phone Assad and tell him that I had confirmed Rabin’s 'pocket deposit.'"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011805.jpg
Quote #1
"The second leak, however, was in the Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz, which published the entire US negotiating paper."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011805.jpg
Quote #2
"Assad’s image as a strongman, implacably tough on Israel, had been built and burnished over his three decades in power."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011805.jpg
Quote #3
"I sat down with Danny Yatom and US Ambassador Martin Indyk in Jerusalem to draw up a 'bottom line' proposal on a withdrawal from the Golan Heights."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011805.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,766 characters)

/ BARAK / 48
seemed to me we might finally be on a path to substantive negotiations. There was obviously not going to be a deal at this round of talks, but I agreed with President Clinton that when they ended, he could phone Assad and tell him that I had confirmed Rabin’s “pocket deposit.”
Yet by the time we left for home, the prospects suddenly looked much worse – for the reason I’d feared from the moment we arrived. There were two major leaks. The first came in an Arabic-language newspaper in London. Given the thrust of the story, it had presumably come from the Syrians. But it was more annoying than truly damaging. The second leak, however, was in the Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz, which published the entire US negotiating paper. This was unwelcome for us, since it confirmed we were ready to go far in return for peace. But for the Syrians, the fact the final-border section was still a work-in-progress, with the parentheses to prove it, created the impression that they’d decided to negotiate the details of a full peace without first nailing down the return of the Golan Heights. Assad’s image as a strongman, implacably tough on Israel, had been built and burnished over his three decades in power. The embarrassment of being seen as amenable to talking about a Syrian embassy in Israel without an agreement on the Golan struck me as a potentially fatal blow to the prospects for a deal, since it dramatically narrowed the scope for the flexibility needed by both sides to negotiate. I can’t say I was surprised when Clinton phoned me when we got back to Israel to say that Assad had refused to send Al-Sharaa back, as planned, for a further round of talks in 10 days’ time.
I didn’t give up, however, and neither did President Clinton. In February, at the Americans’ request, I sat down with Danny Yatom and US Ambassador Martin Indyk in Jerusalem to draw up a “bottom line” proposal on a withdrawal from the Golan Heights. Since I’d already empowered Clinton to reaffirm the “pocket deposit”, I saw no reason not to do this. If only because of Assad’s failing health, I believed it was the only way we could know whether an agreement was possible. We worked on a large satellite map of the Golan and the valley below, and drew our proposed border in red. We marked out a strip of several hundred meters on the far side of the Sea of Galilee. It included, or came near to, a handful of Syrian villages that had been there before 1967. But we were careful to adjust the line to exclude any area where buildings had stood. We compensated – with slightly more territory – by bending the border westward to give the Syrians part of the slope overlooking the lake, in what was now Israel. We also included the hot springs at
334
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011805

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document