| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Tor developers
|
Funder recipient |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Shah of Iran
|
Political support |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
leaders
|
Geopolitical alliance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Middle East Region
|
Geopolitical military |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Russian Government
|
Diplomatic tension |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Saudi King
|
Diplomatic commercial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Saddam Hussein
|
Indirect political support |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mubarak
|
Former ally |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Huawei
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
US universities
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Laura Poitras
|
Adversarial litigious |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Russia
|
Diplomatic negotiating |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
American Companies
|
Lobbying |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Maurene Ryan Comey
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ayad Allawi
|
Strategic asset |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Investigative target |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Airlines
|
Political direction |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
American corporations
|
Proposed cooperation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
CGTN/Xinhua
|
Regulatory |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Mubarak
|
Political support |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Russia's RT registered as a foreign agent. | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | Government entered into a non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | US involvement in a war without congressional authorization, costing hundreds of millions of doll... | Middle East | View |
| N/A | N/A | US government coordination of collective action with the US airline industry | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | Production of discovery materials (>165,000 pages) by the Government. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meetings calling for military intervention | White House / State Department | View |
| N/A | Potential extradition | Analysis of a hypothetical extradition of Ms. Ghislaine Maxwell from the USA to France. | USA/France | View |
| N/A | N/A | Funding shortfall for UNFPA following US withdrawal of funds. | Global | View |
| N/A | N/A | Hacking of Anthem and government employee records (likely OPM hack context). | Cyber/US | View |
| N/A | N/A | US debt ceiling negotiations ongoing. | US | View |
| N/A | N/A | US providing funding for missile defense | US/Israel | View |
| 2025-11-17 | N/A | U.S. slapped $200 bn worth of tariffs on China | Global/Economic | View |
| 2022-02-25 | N/A | Filing of Document 620 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2022-01-05 | N/A | Court Order filed setting briefing schedule for new trial motion and appointing counsel for a juror. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-11-28 | N/A | Submission of anticipated witness order in US v. Maxwell | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-11-28 | N/A | Government submits letter motion to preclude cross-examination under seal in US v. Maxwell. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-11-24 | N/A | Government production of discovery materials (Jencks/Giglio) to defense counsel. | New York, NY | View |
| 2021-11-18 | N/A | Government submits letter regarding birth certificates marked as Government Exhibits for trial. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-11-12 | N/A | Government filed a letter motion (Dkt. No. 455) in US v. Maxwell. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-11-09 | N/A | Production of Jencks Act and Giglio material regarding witnesses for the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. | New York, NY | View |
| 2021-10-25 | N/A | Production of Jencks Act and Giglio materials by the Government to the Defense. | New York, NY | View |
| 2021-10-25 | N/A | Production of additional discovery materials by the Government to the Defense. | New York, NY | View |
| 2021-10-22 | N/A | Filing of document 367-1 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Court | View |
| 2021-10-19 | N/A | Government filing of motions in limine and sealing requests in US v. Maxwell. | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2021-10-18 | N/A | Submission of Government's motions in limine under seal with proposed redactions. | Southern District of New York | View |
This document is an email read receipt dated May 3, 2021, related to the 'US v. Maxwell' legal case. The subject line indicates a discussion (conferral) regarding 'photo and other discovery deficiencies,' suggesting ongoing disputes over evidence handling between legal teams. The sender and recipient identities are redacted.
This document is an email read receipt dated May 3, 2021, related to the 'US v. Maxwell' legal case. The subject line indicates correspondence regarding a 'conferral re photo and other discovery deficiencies'. The sender and recipient information is redacted.
An email thread from January 2020 between Daily Telegraph journalist Harriet Alexander and a source (possibly named Sarah, based on sidebar) regarding a story about Scotland Yard's failure to investigate a trafficking case. The source initially provided information off the record, including an audio recording, but later insisted on going on the record, stating the public needs to know the truth about trafficking outside the UK. The source also expresses strong appreciation for the support of an individual named Peter.
This document is an email dated April 14, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to defense counsel regarding the case US v. Maxwell. The email serves as a transmittal for discovery materials, specifically an additional photograph and a cover letter, which are being prepared on a drive for the client (Ghislaine Maxwell) to review at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC).
An email thread dated August 10, 2019 (the day of Jeffrey Epstein's death), instructing recipients to include Martin Weinberg and Reid Weingarten, identified as Epstein's counsel, on any notifications regarding the case 'US v Epstein'. The email also includes a CC to the US Marshals Service (USMS).
This document is a digital calendar entry from June 28, 2021, for a 15-minute 'Pre-Meeting' regarding a FOIA case titled 'US v Noel/Epstein'. The location and list of attendees are redacted. The meeting is classified as 'X-PERSONAL' with a priority of 5.
This document is an email notification indicating the acceptance of a calendar invitation for a 'Pre-Meeting' regarding 'US v Noel/Epstein FOIA'. The email is dated June 28, 2021. The sender and recipient identities are redacted.
This document is a calendar entry for a meeting scheduled on June 28, 2021, titled 'Pre-Meeting US v Noel/Epstein FOIA'. The meeting was accepted by an attendee from the US Attorney's Office (USANYS), whose name is redacted. The document relates to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) proceedings concerning a case involving Noel and Epstein.
This document is an internal email chain within the Southern District of New York (SDNY) dated December 19, 2019. An Assistant U.S. Attorney reports on a call with counsel for the Trustees of the Epstein estate, who requested a meeting with a senior SDNY official (name redacted) to negotiate the resolution of the government's civil forfeiture claims and discuss a proposed victim compensation fund. The email highlights that the line assistants lack the authority to negotiate these terms.
This is a statistical 'Search Terms Report' generated on January 13, 2021, for the case 'US v Epstein'. It analyzes a dataset labeled 'OPR Materials' containing 300,123 documents. The report indicates that search terms (which are redacted in this document) yielded 19,512 direct hits, or 32,986 hits when including document families. The document provides a breakdown of hit counts for each specific redacted search term.
This document is a redacted email chain from May 2021 among Assistant United States Attorneys at the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The team is coordinating the drafting and editing of a legal filing titled 'Government_Opposition_to_Defense_Supplemental_Pretrial_Motions,' which includes a section on the 'NPA point draft' (likely referring to the Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement). The emails discuss deadlines, compiling sections from different team members, and preparing the final document for review by their supervisors ('the chiefs').
An email chain from September 2020 discussing the technical setup of a Relativity database for the 'US v. Epstein' case. The correspondence details requests for specific document review tags (including 'Potential Brady' and 'Work Product'), the renaming of a folder containing FBI files from Florida, and the assignment of document batches to reviewers.
This document is an email dated October 19, 2021, from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York to the legal defense team of Ghislaine Maxwell (including Christian Everdell, Bobbi Sternheim, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca). The email serves to serve the Government's 'motions in limine' and requests that certain attached documents be filed under seal. The email references case number 20 Cr. 330 (AJN).
This document is an email dated June 30, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to Judge Parker. The email submits an amended application and affidavit for a second warrant, correcting errors made in a submission the previous day. The attachments indicate the warrants and indictments are related to Ghislaine Maxwell (specifically referencing GPS and arrest warrants).
This document is an email dated June 5, 2020, from attorney Jason Foy of Foy & Seplowitz LLC to opposing counsel regarding the case 'US v. Tova Noel'. The email attaches a supplemental discovery demand and asks for an anticipated timeline for a response.
This document is an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (led by Bobbi Sternheim) and the US Government prosecutors regarding the scheduling of the trial start date in Case 20 Cr. 330. The defense argues strongly for a November 8, 2021 start date, citing Maxwell's health in detention and holiday conflicts, while the government proposes November 29, 2021, citing witness availability. The defense also leverages the scheduling dispute to suggest that granting Maxwell bail would resolve the flexibility issues.
An email from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim dated May 11, 2021, regarding the case US v. Maxwell. The email attaches a letter requesting a trial start date of November 8th. Several other attorneys, including Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca, are copied on the correspondence.
An email dated October 28, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to defense counsel (including Laura Menninger and Christian Everdell) regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20 CR 330). The email serves to transmit the Government's reply brief in support of its motions in limine and notes that a redacted version will be filed publicly on October 29.
This document is an email header dated November 29, 2021, with the subject '[EXTERNAL] US V Maxwell'. The sender and recipients are fully redacted. The email contains four PDF attachments likely related to the legal proceedings of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case. The document bears the Bates number EFTA00022185.
This document is an email dated June 15, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to redacted recipients and copied to Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca. The subject concerns 'US v. Maxwell' and an update on conditions at the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center). The email attaches a letter with requested redactions highlighted regarding these conditions.
An email chain from July 26, 2019, between defense attorney Martin G. Weinberg and redacted government prosecutors regarding the case US v Epstein. The discussion focuses on the logistics of discovery production, with Weinberg requesting specific priority access to search warrants and affidavits, and the government confirming an electronic production of evidence by the following Tuesday. Weinberg also mentions coordinating with 'Steptoe IT,' indicating collaboration with Reid Weingarten's firm.
This document is an email read receipt dated July 24, 2019. The subject line is 'Read: RE: US v. Epstein', indicating it is a confirmation that an email regarding the legal case US v. Epstein was opened. The sender and recipient identities are redacted.
This document appears to be an automated email read receipt dated November 12, 2019. The subject line is 'Read: US v. Epstein'. Both the sender and recipient fields are heavily redacted, obscuring the identities of the parties communicating about the case.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity