DOJ-OGR-00009642.jpg

558 KB

Extraction Summary

2
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal filing / court document
File Size: 558 KB
Summary

This document is page 5 of a legal filing (Document 636) from March 1, 2022, in the case involving Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It outlines proposed questions for a hearing regarding 'Juror 50,' specifically probing why the juror answered 'No' to questionnaire questions 48 and 25 regarding past sexual abuse and crime victimization, despite admitting to being sexually abused as a child. The document seeks to establish the credibility of the juror's explanations for these discrepancies.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Alison J. Nathan Judge
Addressee of the document ('The Honorable').
Juror 50 Juror / Subject of Inquiry
The individual whose jury questionnaire responses and credibility are being questioned regarding past sexual abuse.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
The Court
Refers to the judicial body overseeing the case and the hearing.
DOJ
Department of Justice (indicated by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR).

Timeline (3 events)

2022-02-24
Court Opinion & Order
Court
2022-03-01
Filing of Document 636 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
Court
Unknown (Childhood)
Juror 50's experience of being sexually abused
Unknown

Relationships (1)

Juror 50 Juror / Judicial Authority The Court
Juror 50 filled out a questionnaire for the case overseen by the Court.

Key Quotes (4)

"Based on what you have just described about your own experience of being sexually abused as a child, that answer is not true, correct?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009642.jpg
Quote #1
"Have you or a friend or a family member ever been the victim of sexual harassment, sexual abuse, or sexual assault?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009642.jpg
Quote #2
"Have you, or any of your relatives or close friends, ever been the victim of a crime?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009642.jpg
Quote #3
"The Court ruled that the scope of the hearing must include an inquiry into 'the explanation for [the] answers' that Juror 50 gave to the questions in the jury questionnaire."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009642.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,553 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 636 Filed 03/01/22 Page 5 of 22
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
March 1, 2022
Page 5
32. The jury questionnaire that you filled out before you were selected to be a juror on this
case asked you the following question: "Have you or a friend or a family member ever
been the victim of sexual harassment, sexual abuse, or sexual assault?"
a. That was Question 48?
b. And it gave you the choice of marking "Yes (self)" or "Yes (friend of family
member)" or "No"?
c. And you marked "No"?
d. Based on what you have just described about your own experience of being
sexually abused as a child, that answer is not true, correct?
33. The jury questionnaire also asked you the following question: "Have you, or any of
your relatives or close friends, ever been the victim of a crime?"
a. That was Question 25?
b. And it gave you the choice of marking "Yes (self)" or "Yes (friend of family
member)" or "No"?
c. And you marked "No"?
d. Based on what you have just described about your own experience of being
sexually abused as a child, that answer is not true, correct?
B. Questions to Probe the Reasons for Juror 50's Responses to the Questions on the
Questionnaire and the Credibility of His Explanations
The Court ruled that the scope of the hearing must include an inquiry into "the explanation
for [the] answers" that Juror 50 gave to the questions in the jury questionnaire. 2/24/2022 Op. &
Order at 7. The Court therefore must ask questions that explore Juror 50's level of knowledge
2100689.3
DOJ-OGR-00009642

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document