March 01, 2022
Filing of Document 636 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALISON J. NATHAN | person | 2353 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00009653.jpg
This document is page 16 of a court filing (Document 636) from March 1, 2022, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (US v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It lists specific questions directed at a juror regarding their history of sexual abuse, participation in support groups, interactions with a therapist during the trial, and statements made to the media (Instagram and The Independent) about their trauma and stress.
DOJ-OGR-00009648.jpg
This document is page 11 of a legal filing (Document 636) from March 1, 2022, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains a list of proposed questions (numbers 19 and 20) addressed to an individual (likely a juror) regarding their answers on a jury questionnaire. Specifically, it probes whether the individual read, understood, and truthfully answered 'Question 25' regarding being a victim of a crime, noting that the individual answered 'No'.
DOJ-OGR-00009652.jpg
This document is page 15 of a legal filing (Document 636) from March 1, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains a list of proposed questions to be asked of 'Juror 50' (identified as male) regarding whether his history of childhood sexual abuse, involvement in victim advocacy, or therapy history affected his impartiality during the trial. The text argues that direct questions about fairness yield self-serving answers and proposes specific inquiries into the impact of the abuse on his life and relationships.
DOJ-OGR-00009649.jpg
This document is page 12 of a legal filing (Document 636) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (US v. Ghislaine Maxwell), dated March 1, 2022, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It contains a transcript of questions posed to an individual (likely a juror) regarding their attention to detail when filling out a specific questionnaire, specifically referencing Questions 34, 37, and 41. The questioning focuses on establishing that the individual did not 'fly through' the questions but took time to provide written responses.
DOJ-OGR-00009642.jpg
This document is page 5 of a legal filing (Document 636) from March 1, 2022, in the case involving Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It outlines proposed questions for a hearing regarding 'Juror 50,' specifically probing why the juror answered 'No' to questionnaire questions 48 and 25 regarding past sexual abuse and crime victimization, despite admitting to being sexually abused as a child. The document seeks to establish the credibility of the juror's explanations for these discrepancies.
Events with shared participants
Judge Nathan denied Ghislaine Maxwell's third motion for release on bail.
2021-03-22 • Court Docket
Order issued regarding subpoena application for victim information; law firm representing victims ordered to file objections.
2021-03-24 • Court Docket
Teleconference for the Arraignment and Bail Hearing in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell.
2020-07-14 • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
A confidential letter was written in support of Ghislaine Maxwell's character and for bail.
2020-11-17 • Southern District of New York
A letter from Sigrid S. McCawley to Judge Alison J. Nathan was electronically filed with the court.
2022-06-27 • United States District Court, Southern District of New York
A court hearing is mentioned where Virginia Giuffre was expected to be present to give a statement.
Date unknown • courtroom
The District Court imposed concurrent terms of imprisonment of 60 months, 120 months, and 240 months on Ghislaine Maxwell.
Date unknown • United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
Judge Alison J. Nathan ordered deadlines for the defendant's opposition and the government's reply.
2020-10-07 • United States District Court, Southern District of New York
The court order (Document 77) was filed.
2020-12-01 • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Filing of a letter by the defense to propose limited redactions to a court's Opinion and Order.
2022-02-24 • United States District Court
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event