HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031631.jpg
2.2 MB
Extraction Summary
5
People
8
Organizations
4
Locations
0
Events
1
Relationships
6
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email chain
File Size:
2.2 MB
Summary
An email chain from October 2016 between Jeffrey Epstein and Landon Thomas Jr. (likely a journalist). They discuss Saudi Arabian financial movements, specifically the withdrawal of billions (potentially $200B by SAMA) from US funds and BlackRock. Epstein provides geopolitical analysis, discussing the fragmentation of power in the US and Saudi Arabia, the impact of social media on class inequality, and asserts that Donald Trump has 'tapped in' to public anger. The final email in the chain sends a link to a Guardian article about Trump sexual assault lawsuits.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey E. | Sender/Recipient |
Email address jeevacation@gmail.com. Discussing global finance, Saudi politics, and Donald Trump.
|
| Thomas Jr., Landon | Sender/Recipient |
Likely a financial journalist asking Epstein for information/confirmation on Saudi finances. (Landon Thomas Jr. is a ...
|
| Donald Trump | Subject of discussion |
Mentioned in a URL regarding sexual assault lawsuits and in the text regarding tapping into public anger.
|
| Bin Salman | Subject of discussion |
Mohammed bin Salman, referred to regarding the focus of an article.
|
| Norm Lubow | Mentioned in URL |
Name appears in the Guardian link slug.
|
Organizations (8)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SAMA |
Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority, mentioned as withdrawing funds.
|
|
| BlackRock |
Referred to as 'BR' and 'blackrock', discussed as a custodian/money market entity.
|
|
| The Guardian |
Source of the news link shared.
|
|
| Pentagon |
Mentioned as a power center separate from the White House.
|
|
| CIA |
Mentioned as a power center.
|
|
| Congress |
Mentioned as a power center.
|
|
| Costco |
Used metaphorically regarding where the Saudi elite shop.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Document source/footer stamp.
|
Locations (4)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Discussed in political context.
|
|
|
Implied subject of 'Saudi money', 'Royal family'.
|
|
|
Historical reference to the French Revolution.
|
|
|
Mentioned in context of US politics.
|
Relationships (1)
Landon asks Jeffrey for 'back of the envelope guess' and refers to 'your article' (implying Landon is writing one).
Key Quotes (6)
"trump has tapped in."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031631.jpg
Quote #1
"CEO of big finance form told me that Saudis (SAMA) have withdrawn $200 billion that has been parked with usual suspects over past year or so."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031631.jpg
Quote #2
"most of the saudi money is tied up in pe funds. no withdrawals allowed"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031631.jpg
Quote #3
"blackrock is more money market , more like custodian than investor"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031631.jpg
Quote #4
"unlike the french revolution where it was the people of france that revolted against their own aristocracty, with the internet and globalization of discontect it is now the americans that can revolt against the saudi leadership."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031631.jpg
Quote #5
"In politics the USA meant the white house. now there is pentagon. cia, state, and congress in addition, each feels empowered to act more independantly."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031631.jpg
Quote #6
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,848 characters)
From: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Sent: 10/19/2016 3:02:57 PM
To: Thomas Jr., Landon
Subject: Re: Saudi money
Sent: 10/19/2016 3:02:57 PM
To: Thomas Jr., Landon
Subject: Re: Saudi money
Importance: High
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/07/donald-trump-sexual-assault-lawsuits-norm-lubow
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Thomas Jr., Landon < > wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:26 AM, jeffrey E. wrote:
number
number
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Thomas Jr., Landon < > wrote:
I have spoken to a lot of ceos of fund outfits who say Saudis have been pulling billions of dollars in
separate account money -- not just from BR. And plus I cant believe they would have so much tied
up in lock ups.
I have spoken to a lot of ceos of fund outfits who say Saudis have been pulling billions of dollars in
separate account money -- not just from BR. And plus I cant believe they would have so much tied
up in lock ups.
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:48 AM, jeffrey E. wrote:
sorry, no good handle without digging
sorry, no good handle without digging
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Thomas Jr., Landon < > wrote:
what is your back of the envelope guess as to much saudi money tied up in such funds?
what is your back of the envelope guess as to much saudi money tied up in such funds?
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:43 AM, jeffrey E. wrote:
most of the saudi money is tied up in pe funds. no withdrawals allowed . and im not seeing much in the
secondary market. . blackrock is more money market , more like custodian than investor .
most of the saudi money is tied up in pe funds. no withdrawals allowed . and im not seeing much in the
secondary market. . blackrock is more money market , more like custodian than investor .
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Thomas Jr., Landon < > wrote:
Interesting. CEO of big finance form told me that Saudis (SAMA) have withdrawn $200 billion
that has been parked with usual suspects over past year or so. That number seem in line with
what you know?
Interesting. CEO of big finance form told me that Saudis (SAMA) have withdrawn $200 billion
that has been parked with usual suspects over past year or so. That number seem in line with
what you know?
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 7:04 AM, jeffrey E. wrote:
words that you to refer to one thing, USA . the stock market / the Royal family, . are no longer very
useful. In politics the USA meant the white house. now there is pentagon. cia, state, and congress
in addition, each feels empowered to act more independantly. stock market even in
tech, needs bio tech, consuner tech. infrastrucrue tech. etc. same with Royal family, there are
20k members of a tribe. called the royal family, the words are misleading. if your article is
focused on bin salman, or the very top. no one is wondering where they can find the local
costco.. but they are aware that a message needs to be sent to their population , regarding the next 20
years,
social media, and the selfie crowds post the best of everything, their cutest pictures the amazing
food , the luxury resorts. the masses see these things and as the difference between
expectations and reality widen, the anger grows. trump has tapped in.
with the passage of the 9 11 saudi bill, unlike the french revolution where it was the people of france
that revolted against their own aristocracty, with the internet and globalization of discontect it is now
the americans that can revolt against the saudi leadership. it is the americans that are demanding
women drive. not the saudis
words that you to refer to one thing, USA . the stock market / the Royal family, . are no longer very
useful. In politics the USA meant the white house. now there is pentagon. cia, state, and congress
in addition, each feels empowered to act more independantly. stock market even in
tech, needs bio tech, consuner tech. infrastrucrue tech. etc. same with Royal family, there are
20k members of a tribe. called the royal family, the words are misleading. if your article is
focused on bin salman, or the very top. no one is wondering where they can find the local
costco.. but they are aware that a message needs to be sent to their population , regarding the next 20
years,
social media, and the selfie crowds post the best of everything, their cutest pictures the amazing
food , the luxury resorts. the masses see these things and as the difference between
expectations and reality widen, the anger grows. trump has tapped in.
with the passage of the 9 11 saudi bill, unlike the french revolution where it was the people of france
that revolted against their own aristocracty, with the internet and globalization of discontect it is now
the americans that can revolt against the saudi leadership. it is the americans that are demanding
women drive. not the saudis
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031631
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document