This document is a transcript from February 15, 2012, in the case United States v. Daugerdas, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Conrad. The witness, a suspended lawyer, is being aggressively questioned about her defiant behavior toward Judge Pauley during a previous hearing regarding her role as a juror, as well as inquiries into her mental health, specifically bipolar disorder. The witness is evasive, frequently claiming she is not a psychologist and giving sarcastic answers, such as stating she takes 'Water' when asked about medications.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Conrad | Witness/Suspended Lawyer |
Being questioned about her conduct as a juror in a previous trial and her mental health.
|
| Mr. Okula | Attorney |
Raises objections during the questioning.
|
| Paul M. Daugerdas | Defendant |
Named in the case caption and the previous trial 'United States v. Daugerdas'.
|
| Judge Pauley | Judge |
Presided over a previous hearing/trial involving the witness.
|
| Clinton | Former President (implied) |
Mentioned in reference to 'receiving another Clinton appointment'.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States of America | ||
| Southern District Reporters | ||
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (referenced in footer DOJ-OGR).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by 'Southern District Reporters'.
|
"I'm not a psychologist."Source
"Have you been disbarred? ... No. ... So you're a suspended lawyer? ... Correct."Source
"I'm not going to answer this. ... THE COURT: You are directed to answer it. ... No."Source
"Ma'am, has anybody ever told you that you suffer from bipolar disorder? ... Not at all."Source
"What medications do you take? ... Water."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (4,589 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document