Event Details
February 01, 0015
Description
Hearing concerning Conrad's role as a juror in United States v. Daugerdas.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Judge Pauley | person | 146 | View Entity |
| Conrad | person | 113 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009922.jpg
This document is a transcript from February 15, 2012, in the case United States v. Daugerdas, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Conrad. The witness, a suspended lawyer, is being aggressively questioned about her defiant behavior toward Judge Pauley during a previous hearing regarding her role as a juror, as well as inquiries into her mental health, specifically bipolar disorder. The witness is evasive, frequently claiming she is not a psychologist and giving sarcastic answers, such as stating she takes 'Water' when asked about medications.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
A hearing where the witness made statements to Judge Pauley that are the subject of the current examination.
2011-12-20 • Courtroom
Direct examination of juror/witness Conrad regarding her conduct during voir dire.
2012-02-15 • Courtroom
Voir dire (jury selection) commenced for the trial.
2011-03-01 • Courtroom
Direct examination of witness Conrad regarding her residency and truthfulness during jury selection.
2012-02-15 • Courtroom
Witness Conrad swore to bar authorities on February 26th that she lived in the Bronx.
Date unknown
Witness Conrad swore to Judge Pauley on March 2nd that she lived in Bronxville.
Date unknown • Courtroom
Witness Conrad was sworn to give a deposition under oath.
2009-03-24
Judge Pauley explained the purpose of voir dire to the jury pool (venire), including Ms. Conrad.
Date unknown • Federal Court
A past voir dire process is discussed, where the plan was for Judge Pauley to question potential juror Catherine M. Conrad to determine if she was the same person from a court opinion.
Date unknown
Judge Pauley attempted to determine 'The Answerer's' financial ability to hire a lawyer.
2011-12-20 • Court
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event