DOJ-OGR-00019408.jpg
381 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing / legal brief
File Size:
381 KB
Summary
This page from a legal filing, dated September 24, 2020, discusses procedural history regarding the unsealing of documents in the Brown v. Maxwell case. It references specific denied motions by Alan Dershowitz and Michael Cernovich to modify a protective order, as well as a denied request by the Miami Herald to unseal the docket. The top half of the page is heavily redacted.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Brown | Plaintiff/Appellee (implied) |
Named in case citation Brown v. Maxwell
|
| Maxwell | Defendant/Appellant (implied) |
Named in case citation Brown v. Maxwell
|
| Alan Dershowitz | Intervenor/Movant |
Filed motion to modify civil protective order which was declined
|
| Michael Cernovich | Intervenor/Movant |
Filed motion to modify civil protective order which was declined
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Second Circuit Court of Appeals |
Referred to as '2d Cir.', the court hearing the appeal
|
|
| Miami Herald |
Media organization that requested to unseal the district court docket
|
|
| DOJ-OGR |
Department of Justice - Office of Government Relations (implied by Bates stamp)
|
Timeline (1 events)
2019
Appeal in Brown v. Maxwell regarding protective orders and unsealing of the docket
2nd Circuit Court of Appeals
Relationships (1)
Both filed motions to modify the civil protective order referenced in the text.
Key Quotes (1)
"challenged an earlier order in the civil case declining Alan Dershowitz’s and Michael Cernovich’s motions to modify the civil protective order and denying the Miami Herald’s request to unseal the district court docket."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019408.jpg
Quote #1
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (495 characters)
Case 20-3061, Document 60, 09/24/2020, 2938278, Page9 of 58
[REDACTED BLOCK OF APPROXIMATELY 10 LINES]
during the pendency of the appeal in Brown v. Maxwell, No. 18-2868 (2d Cir.) before this Court, which challenged an earlier order in the civil case declining Alan Dershowitz’s and Michael Cernovich’s motions to modify the civil protective order and denying the Miami Herald’s request to unseal the district court docket. Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41, 44 (2d Cir. 2019).
4
DOJ-OGR-00019408
DOJ-OGR-00019408
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document