| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Co movants |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Appeal in Brown v. Maxwell regarding protective orders and unsealing of the docket | 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals | View |
This document is a Court Order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dated September 11, 2020. It orders the United States to submit an amicus brief regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to consolidate her appeal with the criminal case United States v. Maxwell (No. 20-3061) and adjourns a hearing previously scheduled for September 22, 2020.
This page from a legal filing, dated September 24, 2020, discusses procedural history regarding the unsealing of documents in the Brown v. Maxwell case. It references specific denied motions by Alan Dershowitz and Michael Cernovich to modify a protective order, as well as a denied request by the Miami Herald to unseal the docket. The top half of the page is heavily redacted.
This document is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated September 16, 2020. It addresses two separate appeals involving Ghislaine Maxwell: a civil case with Virginia Giuffre (20-2413) and a criminal case with the United States of America (20-3061). The order notes that on September 10, 2020, Maxwell filed a motion to consolidate the two appeals, and this document begins the court's ruling on that motion.
This article from The Virgin Islands Daily News (originally by Miami Herald) reports on Alan Dershowitz's efforts to limit press access to a 2019 court hearing regarding the unsealing of documents in the Epstein/Maxwell sex trafficking case. It details the history of the defamation suit brought by Virginia Roberts Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, the 2017 settlement, and the involvement of high-profile figures like Alexander Acosta and Sarah Ferguson. The article highlights the legal battle between privacy for the accused and the public's right to know, framed by the 'Perversion of Justice' investigation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity