HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031919.jpg
2.63 MB
Extraction Summary
0
People
4
Organizations
5
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Geopolitical analysis / intelligence report (house oversight document)
File Size:
2.63 MB
Summary
This document appears to be page 7 of a geopolitical intelligence report or analysis, marked with a House Oversight footer. The text analyzes the ideological schism between Fatah (secular, accepting of Israel's permanence) and Hamas (Islamist, rejecting Israel) in the context of a U.N. decision on Palestinian statehood. It discusses international reactions, noting that while the Saudis distrust Fatah, they (along with the US and Europe) prefer Fatah over Hamas due to fears of Iran and radical Islamism. The document contains no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or specific financial transactions.
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Fatah |
Described as secular, accepted Israel's permanence, preferred by West
|
|
| Hamas |
Envisions Islamic state, rejects Israel, rivals of Fatah
|
|
| United Nations (U.N.) |
Mentioned regarding a 'decision' (likely statehood vote) that raises stakes
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Indicated by the document footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'
|
Locations (5)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Subject of recognition dispute between Fatah and Hamas
|
|
|
Feared by Saudis and others
|
|
|
Referred to as 'The Saudis', distrust Fatah but fear Iran more
|
|
|
Referred to as 'Americans', tired of playing in the sandbox
|
|
|
Referred to as 'Europeans', supportive of Fatah
|
Relationships (3)
Text describes 'ideological divisions', 'intense conflict', and 'battle' between them.
Text states Saudis 'fear radical Islamists and Iran'.
Europeans and Americans see Fatah as 'friendly to their interests'.
Key Quotes (3)
"Whoever controls the state defines what the Palestinians are"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031919.jpg
Quote #1
"Americans have tired of playing in what some Americans call the "sandbox.""Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031919.jpg
Quote #2
"Fatah has accepted, in practice, the idea of Israel's permanence as a state"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031919.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,101 characters)
7
All nations have ideological divisions, but the Palestinians are
divided over the fundamental question of the Palestinian nation's
identity. Fatah sees itself as part of a secular Arab world that is on the
defensive. Hamas envisions the Palestinian nation as an Islamic state
forming in the context of a region-wide Islamist rising. Neither is in a
position to speak authoritatively for the Palestinian people, and the
things that divide them cut to the heart of the nation. As important,
each has a different view of its future relations with Israel. Fatah has
accepted, in practice, the idea of Israel's permanence as a state and
the need of the Palestinians to accommodate themselves to the reality.
Hamas has rejected it.
The U.N. decision raises the stakes in this debate within the
Palestinian nation that could lead to intense conflict. As vicious as
the battle between Hamas and Fatah has been, an uneasy truce has
existed over recent years. Now, there could emerge an internationally
legitimized state, and control of that state will matter more than ever
before. Whoever controls the state defines what the Palestinians are,
and it becomes increasingly difficult to suspend the argument for a
temporary truce. Rather than settling anything, or putting Israel on
the defensive, the vote will compel a Palestinian crisis.
Fatah has an advantage in any vote on Palestinian statehood: It enjoys
far more international support than Hamas does. Europeans and
Americans see it as friendly to their interests and less hostile to Israel.
The Saudis and others may distrust Fatah from past conflicts, but in
the end they fear radical Islamists and Iran and so require American
support at a time when the Americans have tired of playing in what
some Americans call the "sandbox." However reluctantly, while
aiding Hamas, the Saudis are more comfortable with Fatah. And of
course, the embattled Arabist regimes, whatever tactical shifts there
may have been, spring from the same soil as Fatah. While Fatah is the
preferred Palestinian partner for many, Hamas can also use that
divided over the fundamental question of the Palestinian nation's
identity. Fatah sees itself as part of a secular Arab world that is on the
defensive. Hamas envisions the Palestinian nation as an Islamic state
forming in the context of a region-wide Islamist rising. Neither is in a
position to speak authoritatively for the Palestinian people, and the
things that divide them cut to the heart of the nation. As important,
each has a different view of its future relations with Israel. Fatah has
accepted, in practice, the idea of Israel's permanence as a state and
the need of the Palestinians to accommodate themselves to the reality.
Hamas has rejected it.
The U.N. decision raises the stakes in this debate within the
Palestinian nation that could lead to intense conflict. As vicious as
the battle between Hamas and Fatah has been, an uneasy truce has
existed over recent years. Now, there could emerge an internationally
legitimized state, and control of that state will matter more than ever
before. Whoever controls the state defines what the Palestinians are,
and it becomes increasingly difficult to suspend the argument for a
temporary truce. Rather than settling anything, or putting Israel on
the defensive, the vote will compel a Palestinian crisis.
Fatah has an advantage in any vote on Palestinian statehood: It enjoys
far more international support than Hamas does. Europeans and
Americans see it as friendly to their interests and less hostile to Israel.
The Saudis and others may distrust Fatah from past conflicts, but in
the end they fear radical Islamists and Iran and so require American
support at a time when the Americans have tired of playing in what
some Americans call the "sandbox." However reluctantly, while
aiding Hamas, the Saudis are more comfortable with Fatah. And of
course, the embattled Arabist regimes, whatever tactical shifts there
may have been, spring from the same soil as Fatah. While Fatah is the
preferred Palestinian partner for many, Hamas can also use that
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031919
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document