EFTA00026837.pdf
66.8 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email chain
File Size:
66.8 KB
Summary
This document is an email chain from April 2021 between attorneys at the Southern District of New York (USANYS) discussing a recent opinion by Judge Nathan in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The team arranges a weekend conference call to discuss the Judge's order requiring the government to confirm its position on evidence supporting Maxwell's interpretation of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). One email also references a previous letter regarding discovery materials obtained from the Southern District of Florida (SDFL).
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the email chain and legal discussion regarding discovery and the NPA.
|
| Judge Nathan | Judge |
Judge Alison Nathan, whose written opinion is being discussed by the attorneys.
|
| Unidentified AUSA | Assistant United States Attorney |
Author of the initial email requesting a call; signature block identifies them as AUSA for SDNY.
|
| [Redacted] (USANYS) | Government Officials/Attorneys |
Multiple redacted participants communicating from US Attorney's Office accounts.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| USANYS |
United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (email domain and signature).
|
|
| Southern District of New York |
Jurisdiction of the Assistant United States Attorney.
|
|
| SDFL |
Southern District of Florida (mentioned in context of materials obtained).
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of the prosecuting attorneys.
|
Relationships (2)
Discussion of Judge Nathan's opinion on Maxwell's case.
Discussion of obtaining materials from SDFL (Southern District of Florida).
Key Quotes (2)
"The Government shall confirm in writing within one week whether it views any evidence supporting Maxwell’s interpretation of the NPA as material it is required to disclose, and, if so, whether it has disclosed any and all such evidence in its possession."Source
EFTA00026837.pdf
Quote #1
"recirculating our letter from last fall where we laid out what we were - and were not - obtaining by way of SDFL materials"Source
EFTA00026837.pdf
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,070 characters)
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Maxwell
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2021 14:45:26 +0000
Attachments: 2020-10-07_GM_letter_to_Judge_Nathan_re_discovery_from_other_agencies_(FINAL).pdf
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Maxwell
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2021 14:45:26 +0000
Attachments: 2020-10-07_GM_letter_to_Judge_Nathan_re_discovery_from_other_agencies_(FINAL).pdf
Attached.
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Saturday, April 17, 2021 10:17 AM
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: Maxwell
Sent: Saturday, April 17, 2021 10:17 AM
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: Maxwell
If someone is online before our call, would you mind recirculating our letter from last fall where we laid out what we were - and were not - obtaining by way of SDFL materials, and what we planned to do with the [Redacted] emails? Thanks
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 16, 2021, at 7:38 PM, [Redacted] <[Redacted]> wrote:
Thanks very much – the team is free at 11:30 a.m. tomorrow morning, so I'll send around a calendar invitation for then.
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2021 7:24 PM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: Maxwell
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2021 7:24 PM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: Maxwell
Me too.
On Apr 16, 2021, at 7:22 PM, [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]> wrote:
I saw that and figured we would need to discuss. Would tomorrow morning work? I am fairly flexible before 12:30.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 16, 2021, at 7:17 PM, [Redacted] <[Redacted]> wrote:
EFTA00026837
EFTA00026837
[Redacted],
Could we please schedule a call to discuss this portion of Judge Nathan’s opinion (on page 8):
“The Government shall confirm in writing within one week whether it views any evidence supporting Maxwell’s interpretation of the NPA as material it is required to disclose, and, if so, whether it has disclosed any and all such evidence in its possession.”
Would it be possible to have a call this weekend?
Thanks,
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
EFTA00026838
[Redacted]
Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
EFTA00026838
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document