HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017330.jpg

2.02 MB

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Book manuscript / draft (memoir)
File Size: 2.02 MB
Summary

This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir draft by Alan Dershowitz (dated 4.2.12 in header). In it, he discusses the ethical complications and public backlash he faced for representing Mike Tyson in his rape appeal. He quotes several angry letters he received and describes how Harvard Law School students protested his involvement, with some threatening to file sexual harassment charges against him for creating a 'hostile environment'.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Alan Dershowitz Author / Attorney / Professor
The narrator of the text, discussing his representation of Mike Tyson and the backlash received from the public and H...
Mike Tyson Client / Defendant
Described as a 'convicted rapist' and a 'punk' by letter writers; represented by Dershowitz on appeal.
Harvard Law School students Critics
Objected to Dershowitz representing Tyson; some threatened sexual harassment charges claiming a 'hostile environment'.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Harvard Law School
Institution where the author teaches and where students protested his representation of Tyson.
Jewish community
Referenced in a letter claiming Dershowitz attaches the community to his actions.

Timeline (2 events)

Early 1990s (Contextual)
Mike Tyson's Appeal
Court (implied)
Unknown
Classroom discussions on rape law
Harvard Law School
Alan Dershowitz Harvard Law Students

Locations (2)

Location Context
Location of the alleged crime discussed in the text.
Location of the author's classes and student protests.

Relationships (2)

Alan Dershowitz Attorney/Client Mike Tyson
Text discusses Dershowitz agreeing to represent Tyson on his appeal.
Alan Dershowitz Professor/Student Harvard Law School students
Text mentions 'my students' and teaching criminal law class.

Key Quotes (4)

"Shame on you, Alan Dershowitz, if you handle this appeal."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017330.jpg
Quote #1
"Mike Tyson? He doesn’t deserve the best—it’s a shanda!!"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017330.jpg
Quote #2
"No means no. There is no gray area."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017330.jpg
Quote #3
"A couple of them even threatened to file 'sexual harassment' charged against me because my representation of Tyson created a 'hostile environment'"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017330.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,641 characters)

4.2.12
WC: 191694
actions that fall into a gray area. Let me explain something: No means no. There is no
gray area.
But in many date rape situations, the alleged victim didn’t say no. Nor did she say yes. There are
grey areas.
I received countless letters, phone calls, and personal attacks denouncing me for agreeing to
represent Tyson on his appeal. Here are some excerpts from the letters:
It’s too bad that a punk like Tyson can afford to pay for the top legal representation…but
since you had the right to refuse to represent him, I fault you!
It saddens me that you yourself continue to worship at the altar of the great god of
violence and fear of women.
Mr. Tyson is a convicted rapist with obvious psychological problems who needs a
psychiatrist not an attorney who will argue excuses for his behavior! If, through your
efforts, Mike Tyson is not held accountable for his behavior, then you do a disservice to
all women and we become victims of a pandemic legal system gone awry!
Mike Tyson? He doesn’t deserve the best—it’s a shanda!! (“Shanda” is the Yiddish for
“shame.”)
When you choose to represent someone like Mike Tyson, you attach the Jewish
community to your action…I now find it hard to understand how you can mount a
passionate defense for a convicted rapist.
Shame on you, Alan Dershowitz, if you handle this appeal.
The most surprising response came from some Harvard Law School students, who should
understand that our adversary system of justice requires that all convicted defendants be accorded
a zealous appeal.
I don’t know what actually took place in Mike Tyson’s hotel room on that fateful night, but it
may well have fallen into the category of gray area. He believed that she wanted to sleep with
him. She may have been ambivalent or sending mixed signals (though I doubt it). It was a close
case and Tyson was entitled to have his defense presented vigorously, both at trial and on appeal.
Yet several of my students strongly objected to their teacher representing “a convicted rapist.” A
couple of them even threatened to file “sexual harassment” charged against me because my
representation of Tyson created a “hostile environment” for students who believed he was guilty.
The protest then broadened to the way I discussed the crime of rape in class. In my criminal law
class, I teach the law of rape as an example of a cutting-edge subject that poses a sharp conflict
between the rights of defendants and their accusers. As usual, I take a “devil’s advocate” position
on politically correct issues. For example, although I personally oppose capital punishment, I
243
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017330

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document