Mike Tyson
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Don King
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Desiree Washington
|
Accuser defendant |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Desiree Washington
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Desiree Washington
|
Sexual adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Johnny Gill
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the author
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Narrator (Alan Dershowitz)
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Desiree Washington
|
Accused accuser |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Desiree Washington
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Patricia Gifford
|
Judge defendant |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Author
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Desiree Washington
|
Accused accuser |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Meeting at 1:45 AM and subsequent visit to hotel room at 2:30 AM | Hotel / Limo | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual encounter/Alleged Rape involving Mike Tyson and Desiree Washington. | Hotel room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mike Tyson cases | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual encounter between Mike Tyson and Desiree Washington. | Tyson's hotel room/bedroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mike Tyson's Appeal | Court (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual encounter between Mike Tyson and Desiree Washington which led to rape charges. | Tyson's hotel room, Indiana... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Prosecution and conviction of Mike Tyson. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Narrator visits Tyson in prison; sits side-by-side facing a camera. | Prison | View |
| N/A | N/A | Hotel room incident leading to rape accusation | Hotel Room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Limo ride to hotel | Limousine | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mike Tyson Rape Case | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between Washington and Tyson | Limousine / Hotel | View |
| 2025-11-17 | N/A | Appellate Court Argument | Appellate Court | View |
| 1992-01-01 | N/A | First meeting between the narrator and Mike Tyson in a hotel room in Indianapolis. | Indianapolis, Indiana | View |
| 1992-01-01 | N/A | Mike Tyson Rape Trial | Indiana | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026518.jpg
This document is a page of political satire and internet humor, likely forwarded via email and captured in a discovery process (indicated by the House Oversight Bates stamp). It lists fictional, ironic book titles attributed to various celebrities and political figures—mostly Democrats or controversial public figures—to mock their perceived hypocrisies or scandals (e.g., O.J. Simpson on finding killers, Ted Kennedy on driving safely). There is no factual information regarding Jeffrey Epstein, flight logs, or financial transactions in this specific document.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017091.jpg
This document is a draft page, dated April 2, 2012, from the preface of Alan Dershowitz's autobiography 'Taking the Stand.' It outlines his career highlights, listing high-profile clients such as OJ Simpson, Mike Tyson, and Claus Von Bulow, as well as his involvement in major historical legal events like the Clinton impeachment and the Pentagon Papers case. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017059.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a scientific paper or report analyzing linguistic trends and cultural fame over time (Culturomics/N-grams). It contains figure captions (I through L) describing graphs that track the frequency of words like 'radio,' sports names, and famous athletes like Michael Jordan and Babe Ruth. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer, suggesting it was included in a larger production of documents for a congressional investigation, though the specific page content is unrelated to Epstein's criminal activities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017058.jpg
This document is a scientific figure labeled 'Figure S19' containing 12 graphs (A-L) that visualize 'Culturomic timelines' showing the frequency of specific words in books between 1800 and 2000. Topics covered include civil rights, genocide, medical terms, economic terms (GDP, recession), and famous athletes (Jordan, Tyson, Ruth). The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017058' stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a House Oversight Committee investigation, potentially related to scientific funding or correspondence involving Jeffrey Epstein, though he is not explicitly named in the text.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017349.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript draft (indicated by word count and date headers) written by an attorney, likely Alan Dershowitz, given the specific anecdotes and clients mentioned. The text analyzes the 'irrational' risky behavior of celebrity clients, specifically citing Leona Helmsley's tax evasion and Mike Tyson's rape conviction as examples where the risks outweighed the benefits. The author concludes with a psychological analysis of celebrity entitlement and a personal anecdote about reusing tea bags.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017347.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a book manuscript (Chapter 15) written by a high-profile lawyer (likely Alan Dershowitz, given the context of the document dump). The text discusses the intersection of media and law, referencing the O.J. Simpson and Mike Tyson cases as examples of high-publicity trials. The author reflects on the concept of 'celebrity justice,' the impact of televised trials (mentioning Court TV), and defends their record of representing both famous and indigent clients.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017342.jpg
This document appears to be a draft of a legal essay or book chapter, dated April 2, 2012, discussing the 'reasonable mistake of fact' defense in rape cases. The author (implied to be a legal scholar, likely Alan Dershowitz given the collection context) argues that while 'no means no,' ambiguous situations exist where legal punishment might be inappropriate despite moral wrongness, using the Mike Tyson case and Ella Fitzgerald lyrics as illustrative examples. The document is marked with a House Oversight Committee stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017336.jpg
A page from a draft manuscript (dated April 2, 2012) bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. The text, written in the first person by an experienced defense attorney (likely Alan Dershowitz given the context of Tyson/DSK analysis), compares the evidence in the Dominique Strauss-Kahn and Mike Tyson cases, arguing the DSK case was stronger despite being dropped. The author then recounts a specific anecdote from early in their career in Provincetown, MA, where a man falsely accused a 'black man wearing a shark tooth' of rape to cover up a consensual homosexual encounter from his fiancé.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017330.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir draft by Alan Dershowitz (dated 4.2.12 in header). In it, he discusses the ethical complications and public backlash he faced for representing Mike Tyson in his rape appeal. He quotes several angry letters he received and describes how Harvard Law School students protested his involvement, with some threatening to file sexual harassment charges against him for creating a 'hostile environment'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017328.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz) dated April 2, 2012, discussing the appeal process for Mike Tyson's rape conviction. It details the defense's strategy, criticizing Trial Judge Patricia Gifford for legal errors and bias, and quotes a USA Today report praising Dershowitz's performance in court. The text highlights specific legal arguments used in the appeal, including blocked testimony, jury instruction errors, and alleged prosecutorial misconduct regarding book/film rights.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017327.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or investigative report (possibly by Alan Dershowitz, given the context of House Oversight documents related to the Epstein investigation often including his other cases) defending Mike Tyson against rape charges. The text argues that the accuser, Desiree Washington, fabricated the rape allegation to avoid her father's wrath, citing a history of domestic issues. It details the lack of physical evidence (bruises, sequins) and inconsistencies in Washington's story compared to the physical reality of the encounter.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017326.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a legal argument or investigative report (labeled with House Oversight footer) defending Mike Tyson against rape charges filed by Desiree Washington. The text argues the encounter was consensual, citing Washington's behavior (not locking the bathroom door, getting on top), and characterizes her as a 'groupie' motivated by money, comparing her intentions to Robin Givens. It also alleges Washington had a history of making false accusations to appease her strict father.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017325.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or legal review (likely authored by Alan Dershowitz given the style and context of House Oversight documents) analyzing the Mike Tyson rape trial. The text harshly criticizes the Indiana judicial system and Judge Gifford for alleged bias, unethical media lobbying, and procedural errors. It also details and questions the account of the accuser, Desiree Washington, highlighting her behavior leading up to the event to cast doubt on her testimony.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017323.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a legal manuscript or book draft (possibly by Alan Dershowitz given the context of House Oversight documents) discussing the Mike Tyson rape trial. It argues that the prosecution and the accuser, Desiree Washington, suppressed evidence regarding a financial contingency fee agreement and Washington's sexual history. The text details how a Rhode Island lawyer felt ethically compelled to disclose the fee agreement despite the Indiana court ignoring it, and claims three eyewitnesses saw consensual physical affection between Tyson and Washington prior to the alleged assault.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017322.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a legal manuscript or investigative report (possibly by Alan Dershowitz, given the context of House Oversight dumps related to his archives) critiquing the prosecution's case in the Mike Tyson rape trial. The text aggressively challenges the credibility of the victim, Desiree Washington, alleging that her 'virginal' image was a fabrication facilitated by rape shield laws and that her family was motivated by financial gain through movie rights and lawsuits. It details a meeting in Rhode Island where the family allegedly signed a contingency fee agreement to pursue 'big bucks' immediately after the incident.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017320.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir (dated 4.2.12) written by Alan Dershowitz (implied context) regarding his representation of Mike Tyson. The text recounts their first meeting in Indianapolis where Dershowitz called Tyson a 'schmuck' for putting himself in a compromising position, which led to Tyson hiring him. It details Tyson's honorable conduct as a client, his time in prison, and his eventual repayment of legal fees after his release, while criticizing Tyson's original trial counsel.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017319.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz) dated April 2, 2012. It discusses the legal philosophy surrounding rape prosecutions, the trade-off between convicting the guilty and protecting the innocent, and the author's shift toward defending accused rapists. The text specifically details the author's involvement as the appellate lawyer for Mike Tyson following his conviction for raping Desiree Washington in Indianapolis.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | Mike Tyson | Alan Dershowitz/L... | $0.00 | Implied legal fees ('Tyson got his money's wort... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Mike Tyson | Narrator (Dershow... | $0.00 | Checks sent for the full amount owed for legal ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Narrator | Mike Tyson | $0.00 | Pro bono representation provided when Tyson ran... | View |
Invitation
Tyson called her at 1:45 AM and invited her to his hotel room.
Proposition
Stated 'That's not what I [have] in mind... I want you. I want to fuck you.'
Reflection on conviction
Tyson acknowledged he was a 'schmuck' for risking so much for so little.
Legal Appeal
Tyson calls regarding appeal; ends call politely when he hears baby crying.
Meeting up
Tyson called Washington at 1:45 AM; she agreed to meet him in his limo.
Hiring interview
Discussion about innocence and character; Tyson hires narrator after being called a 'schmuck'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity