This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed Aug 10, 2022) detailing a sidebar conversation between the Judge and defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca during the cross-examination of a witness named Alessi. The discussion focuses on a semantic argument regarding whether the witness's prior testimony of 'multiple occasions' is inconsistent with a specific statement of observing a person named 'Jane' exactly 'three' times at Epstein's Palm Beach home. The defense argues that 'three' contradicts 'multiple,' while the Court questions this logic.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the sidebar conference, questioning the defense's definition of 'multiple'.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Defense Attorney |
Arguing that testimony stating 'three occasions' is inconsistent with previous testimony of 'multiple occasions'.
|
| Alessi | Witness |
Identified in the header 'Alessi - Cross' (likely Juan Alessi, house manager). The sidebar concerns his testimony.
|
| Jane | Subject of testimony |
Person observed by the witness along with her mother.
|
| Jane's Mother | Subject of testimony |
Person observed with Jane.
|
| Mr. Epstein | Subject |
Mentioned regarding his home in Palm Beach.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Footer information.
|
|
| DOJ |
Referenced in footer ID (DOJ-OGR).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
"THE COURT: 'Three' is not 'multiple'?"Source
"MR. PAGLIUCA: Not in my view, your Honor. It is inconsistent with 'multiple.'"Source
"THE COURT: I mean, unless we're speaking a different language."Source
"MR. PAGLIUCA: It's not multiple, it's three."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,191 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document