DOJ-OGR-00014934.jpg

609 KB

Extraction Summary

5
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 609 KB
Summary

This page is a transcript from the direct examination of Dr. Rocchio in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The government moves to admit 'Government Exhibit 5,' an article written by Park Dietz, which is accepted without objection. Dr. Rocchio explains that he provided this article to the government to clarify the concepts of 'grooming' and 'seduction' as established patterns in sexual abuse dynamics, noting specifically how older literature often used terminology that victim-blamed.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Dr. Rocchio Witness/Expert
Testifying on direct examination regarding grooming, seduction, and sexual abuse dynamics.
Ms. Pomerantz Attorney (Prosecution/Government)
Conducting the direct examination of Dr. Rocchio.
Mr. Pagliuca Attorney (Defense)
Stated 'No objection' to the admission of evidence.
Park Dietz Author
Author of an article entered as Government Exhibit 5.
The Court Judge
Presiding judge (Judge Engelmayer based on case number) who received the exhibit into evidence.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Government
The party holding the burden of proof, represented by Ms. Pomerantz.
DOJ
Department of Justice (referenced in footer DOJ-OGR code).

Timeline (2 events)

2025-01-15
Direct examination of Dr. Rocchio in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
Courtroom (Southern District)
During testimony
Admission of Government Exhibit 5 into evidence.
Courtroom

Locations (1)

Location Context
Likely Southern District of New York (SDNY), implied by the court reporters.

Relationships (1)

Dr. Rocchio Expert Witness/Counsel The Government
Dr. Rocchio provided literature to the government upon request to aid the court's understanding.

Key Quotes (2)

"This does a really nice job of pointing to the part that the terms grooming and seduction refer to a pattern of behavior that's widely known and well established to be part of the dynamics of sexual abuse."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014934.jpg
Quote #1
"I appreciated the author's emphasis later on in the article of some of the problems with the words seduction and some of the ways that much earlier literature erroneously used terminology that could inappropriately indicate a victim is blamed for the abuse that they have been subjected to."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014934.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,438 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 782 Filed 01/15/25 Page 58 of 158 58
LBAGmax2 Rocchio - Direct
1 Q. Who wrote this article?
2 A. Park Dietz.
3 MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, we move to admit
4 Government Exhibit 5.
5 MR. PAGLIUCA: No objection.
6 THE COURT: Government Exhibit 5 is received.
7 (Government's Exhibit 5 received in evidence)
8 BY MS. POMERANTZ:
9 Q. Dr. Rocchio, did you provide the government with this
10 article?
11 A. I did.
12 Q. Why did you provide the government with this article?
13 A. I was asked to provide examples to the government of
14 literature in the field that I thought might be helpful to the
15 court to understand the concepts that I'm talking about. This
16 does a really nice job of pointing to the part that the terms
17 grooming and seduction refer to a pattern of behavior that's
18 widely known and well established to be part of the dynamics of
19 sexual abuse. But in particular, I appreciated the author's
20 emphasis later on in the article of some of the problems with
21 the words seduction and some of the ways that much earlier
22 literature erroneously used terminology that could
23 inappropriately indicate a victim is blamed for the abuse that
24 they have been subjected to.
25 MS. POMERANTZ: Can you pull up Page 31, please.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014934

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document