This page is a transcript from the direct examination of Dr. Rocchio in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The government moves to admit 'Government Exhibit 5,' an article written by Park Dietz, which is accepted without objection. Dr. Rocchio explains that he provided this article to the government to clarify the concepts of 'grooming' and 'seduction' as established patterns in sexual abuse dynamics, noting specifically how older literature often used terminology that victim-blamed.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Dr. Rocchio | Witness/Expert |
Testifying on direct examination regarding grooming, seduction, and sexual abuse dynamics.
|
| Ms. Pomerantz | Attorney (Prosecution/Government) |
Conducting the direct examination of Dr. Rocchio.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Attorney (Defense) |
Stated 'No objection' to the admission of evidence.
|
| Park Dietz | Author |
Author of an article entered as Government Exhibit 5.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding judge (Judge Engelmayer based on case number) who received the exhibit into evidence.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| Government |
The party holding the burden of proof, represented by Ms. Pomerantz.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (referenced in footer DOJ-OGR code).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Likely Southern District of New York (SDNY), implied by the court reporters.
|
"This does a really nice job of pointing to the part that the terms grooming and seduction refer to a pattern of behavior that's widely known and well established to be part of the dynamics of sexual abuse."Source
"I appreciated the author's emphasis later on in the article of some of the problems with the words seduction and some of the ways that much earlier literature erroneously used terminology that could inappropriately indicate a victim is blamed for the abuse that they have been subjected to."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,438 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document