DOJ-OGR-00005879.jpg

840 KB

Extraction Summary

8
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
0
Relationships
6
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court filing exhibit / academic literature excerpt
File Size: 840 KB
Summary

This document is page 12 of 43 from a court filing (Document 397-1) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains excerpts from academic literature discussing the psychology and methodology of 'Grooming in Child Sexual Abuse,' specifically citing studies on boundary violations, sexual desensitization, and environmental manipulation. The text outlines statistical findings regarding how abusers gradually increase physical contact, violate privacy (e.g., entering bathrooms), and manipulate families to gain access to victims.

People (8)

Name Role Context
Knoll Researcher/Author
Cited regarding teachers using bribery and conversation to groom victims.
Gallagher Researcher/Author
Cited regarding entrapment behaviors and physical contact initiation.
Spiegel Researcher/Author
Cited regarding gender differences in sexual desensitization and pornography use.
Berliner Researcher/Author
Cited regarding statistics of boundary violations reported by children.
Conte Researcher/Author
Cited regarding statistics of boundary violations reported by children.
Christiansen Researcher/Author
Cited regarding stages of grooming in father-daughter incest.
Blake Researcher/Author
Cited regarding stages of grooming in father-daughter incest.
Elliott Researcher/Author
Cited regarding offenders gaining trust of the family to abuse the child.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
DOJ
Department of Justice (indicated by footer stamp DOJ-OGR)

Key Quotes (6)

"Knoll (2010) found that while a teacher is using bribery to gain the trust of a victim, typically conversation about sexual matters with the student is also starting to emerge."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00005879.jpg
Quote #1
"Gallagher (2000) found that in cases where 'entrapment' behaviors were reported, 43% of perpetrators initiated physical contact with the child and 17% behaved in a sexual manner with the child."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00005879.jpg
Quote #2
"Spiegel (2003) noted that the use of pornography to sexually desensitize children is more common with male victims than with female victims."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00005879.jpg
Quote #3
"Berliner and Conte (1990) found that 70% of children reported that their abusers 'accidentally' came into their bedroom or bathroom while they were undressing"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00005879.jpg
Quote #4
"30% indicated that their abusers 'taught sex education' by showing pornographic pictures and touching the child’s body"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00005879.jpg
Quote #5
"Elliott and colleagues (1995) found that 20% of the offenders in their sample admitted they gained the trust of the child’s family with the purpose of abusing the child."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00005879.jpg
Quote #6

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,952 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 397-1 Filed 10/29/21 Page 12 of 43
Grooming in Child Sexual Abuse 967
Knoll (2010) found that while a teacher is using bribery to gain the
trust of a victim, typically conversation about sexual matters with the stu-
dent is also starting to emerge. Physical contact is then gradually increased.
Furthermore, Gallagher (2000) found that in cases where “entrapment”
behaviors were reported, 43% of perpetrators initiated physical contact with
the child and 17% behaved in a sexual manner with the child.
Furthermore, differences between genders of the victim have also been
noted in the sexual desensitization type of grooming. Spiegel (2003) noted
that the use of pornography to sexually desensitize children is more common
with male victims than with female victims.
Boundary Violations
Berliner and Conte (1990) found that 70% of children reported that their
abusers “accidentally” came into their bedroom or bathroom while they were
undressing; 61% indicated that their abusers “accidentally” touched their pri-
vate parts; 61% said that their abusers did not respect their privacy or let
them close doors; 61% reported that their abusers “accidentally” showed
their naked body to them; 57% indicated that their abusers would purposely
do things with the child that involved physical contact; 48% said that their
abusers made sexual comments about the child’s body or clothing; 44%
reported that their abusers asked them to do things that involved physical
contact; 30% said that their abusers would inspect the child’s body “to see
how it was developing”; 30% indicated that their abusers “taught sex educa-
tion” by showing pornographic pictures and touching the child’s body; 26%
reported that their abusers told the child about sexual things he had previ-
ously done; and 22% indicated that their abusers put lotion or ointment on
the child when they were alone but said he was doing nothing wrong.
According to Christiansen and Blake’s (1990) stages of grooming in
father–daughter incest, the last step involves the father violating his daugh-
ter’s boundaries. In particular, fathers may insist on bathing their daughters
and do not allow other family members to do this. These baths frequently
involve inappropriate sexual behavior. Fathers also insist on dressing their
daughters or on watching them get dressed. In addition, fathers will tend
to watch the child use the bathroom. Finally, perpetrating fathers will have
sexually explicit conversations with the daughter to further desensitize them.
Grooming the Child’s Environment
Elliott and colleagues (1995) found that 20% of the offenders in their sam-
ple admitted they gained the trust of the child’s family with the purpose of
abusing the child. Forty-eight percent isolated their victims through babysit-
ting. Furthermore, Knoll (2010) found that a teacher can also manipulate the
DOJ-OGR-00005879

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document