Conte
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1989-01-01 | Research study/interviews | Conte, Wolf, and Smith interviewed 26 offenders about their crimes, focusing on how they identify... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00004850.jpg
This document is page 38 of a legal filing from the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on July 2, 2021. It discusses legal arguments regarding the admissibility of 'prior bad acts' evidence and the 'doctrine of chances,' heavily citing Pennsylvania case law involving Bill Cosby (Commonwealth v. Cosby) and Andrea Constand. The text argues that the similarity of crimes can outweigh the remoteness in time between incidents.
DOJ-OGR-00005906.jpg
This document, a page from a legal filing, provides an academic analysis of the methods used in the sexual grooming of children. It outlines two forms, physical and psychological grooming, detailing tactics such as desensitization to touch, isolation from others, creating secrets, and using threats or bribes to ensure compliance and prevent disclosure. The text cites numerous researchers to support its description of how offenders manipulate children and exploit their vulnerabilities.
DOJ-OGR-00005903.jpg
This document, an excerpt from a larger text filed in a legal case, analyzes the psychological processes of child sexual offenders. It discusses the concept of "self-grooming," where offenders justify their actions to themselves, and explores the cognitive distortions and "implicit theories" they use to rationalize their behavior. The text also notes that offenders have a special ability to identify vulnerable children, such as those with poor parental relationships or who have been previously victimized.
DOJ-OGR-00005879.jpg
This document is page 12 of 43 from a court filing (Document 397-1) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains excerpts from academic literature discussing the psychology and methodology of 'Grooming in Child Sexual Abuse,' specifically citing studies on boundary violations, sexual desensitization, and environmental manipulation. The text outlines statistical findings regarding how abusers gradually increase physical contact, violate privacy (e.g., entering bathrooms), and manipulate families to gain access to victims.
DOJ-OGR-00005876.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, likely an expert report, that analyzes the grooming tactics of child sex offenders by reviewing academic literature. It cites studies from 1989, 1995, and 2004 to describe how offenders identify vulnerable children and use methods like attention, bribery, and coercion to gain trust and access. The text details specific strategies, such as becoming welcome in a child's home, offering gifts, and targeting children who seem needy or easy to manipulate.
DOJ-OGR-00005869.jpg
This document is page 2 of an exhibit filed on October 29, 2021, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains the first page of an academic article titled 'The Construct of Grooming in Child Sexual Abuse: Conceptual and Measurement Issues' published in the Journal of Child Sexual Abuse in 2014. The text defines grooming as a 'seduction stage' used to gain access to victims and discusses the need for a scientific definition of the term. It bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp (DOJ-OGR-00005869).
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity