This document is Page 2 of a Government filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed 10/15/21) addressing defense complaints regarding legal mail delays at the MDC. The Government argues that a request for 1-day mail turnaround is burdensome given the facility houses 1,700 inmates. It details the timeline of a specific hard drive delivery: sent Oct 11, received Oct 12, delayed Oct 13 due to an 'institutional emergency,' and personally delivered to the defendant by MDC legal counsel on Oct 14, 2021.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Defendant | Inmate/Accused |
Subject of the legal mail delivery dispute; housed at MDC. (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE corresponds to United States v. Gh...
|
| Legal counsel at the MDC | MDC Staff/Attorney |
Explained protocols to the Government; personally delivered hard drive to the defendant.
|
| Defense counsel | Attorney |
Lawyers representing the defendant who requested expedited mail delivery.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MDC |
Facility housing approximately 1,700 inmates including the defendant.
|
|
| The Government |
Filing the document; coordinating with MDC regarding discovery delivery.
|
|
| FedEx |
Used to ship the hard drive containing disclosures.
|
|
| Court |
Issued orders regarding disclosures.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of the defendant and the 'institutional emergency'.
|
|
|
Located at the MDC; origin point for internal mail distribution.
|
"request that the MDC be ordered to provide the defendant with all legal mail within one day of receipt by the MDC would be extremely burdensome and is not practicable"Source
"The Government respectfully submits that there are no circumstances that merit special expedited delivery for this defendant"Source
"institutional emergency impacting the safety and security of the MDC on October 13, 2021"Source
"legal counsel at the MDC personally delivered the hard drive to the defendant."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,763 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document