DOJ-OGR-00021754.jpg

780 KB

Extraction Summary

5
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal brief / court filing (appellate)
File Size: 780 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a legal brief (Case 22-1426) filed on July 27, 2023, arguing that Ghislaine Maxwell should be considered a third-party beneficiary of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The text cites legal precedents regarding plea agreements and asserts that the NPA's immunity for 'potential co-conspirators' extends to Maxwell for offenses between 2001 and 2007. A footnote highlights that Florida investigators interviewed victims Carolyn, Virginia Roberts, and Annie Farmer, establishing an overlap between the Florida investigation and the SDNY trial.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant/Appellant
Argues she is a third-party beneficiary of Epstein's NPA; described as a member of conspiracies from 1994-2004.
Jeffrey Epstein Subject of NPA
Principal offender whose Non-Prosecution Agreement covers potential co-conspirators.
Carolyn Witness/Victim
Interviewed by investigators in Florida; cited in court record (SA86, SA72fn.72).
Virginia Roberts Witness/Victim
Interviewed by investigators in Florida; cited in court record (SA173fn.217).
Annie Farmer Witness/Victim
Interviewed by investigators in Florida; cited in court record (SA193fn.239).

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Government
Prosecution; party to the NPA and current legal proceedings.
District Court
Lower court that recognized Maxwell as part of the definable class in the NPA.
FBI
Law enforcement agency whose investigations were subject to the NPA.
SDNY
Southern District of New York; jurisdiction where conspiracies were charged.

Timeline (2 events)

1994-2004
Conspiracies charged in the indictment.
SDNY and elsewhere
2001-2007
Offenses committed by Epstein covered by the NPA co-conspirator provision.
Unspecified

Locations (2)

Location Context
Location of investigation and interviews.
Jurisdiction of indictment (New York).

Relationships (2)

Ghislaine Maxwell Co-conspirator Jeffrey Epstein
Text refers to Maxwell as a 'potential co-conspirator' and member of conspiracies charged in the indictment.
Virginia Roberts Witness/Interviewer Florida Investigators
Footnote states 'investigators in Florida had interviewed... Virginia Roberts'.

Key Quotes (4)

"Here, the NPA grants immunity to 'any potential co-conspirators of Epstein, including but not limited to [four named individuals].'"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021754.jpg
Quote #1
"As the District Court recognized, this is a definable class that includes Ms. Maxwell."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021754.jpg
Quote #2
"[T]he co-conspirator provision...cover[s] any involvement of Maxwell in offenses committed by Epstein from 2001 to 2007"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021754.jpg
Quote #3
"Specifically, investigators in Florida had interviewed Carolyn... Virginia Roberts... and Annie Farmer"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021754.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,869 characters)

Case 22-1426, Document 87, 07/27/2023, 3548202, Page12 of 35
& Indemn. Co., 37 N.Y.2d 211, 219 (N.Y. 1975). And, as the court stated in Florida
West, a plea agreement is enforceable by a third party as long as the “[a]greement
evince[s] an intent to extend [immunity] to a definable class of third parties" and the
third party seeking enforcement “fall[s] within this category of beneficiaries.” 853
F.Supp.2d at 1228-29; see id. at 1214 (defendant, as a third-party beneficiary, could
enforce a plea agreement between the Government and an air cargo company, which
immunized unnamed “employees” of the company’s subsidiaries); see also Stolt-
Nielsen, 524 F.Supp.2d at 613, 620 (defendants, as third-party beneficiaries, could
enforce an agreement between the Government and Stolt-Nielsen, which promised
leniency to unnamed directors, officers, and employees).
Here, the NPA grants immunity to “any potential co-conspirators of Epstein,
including but not limited to [four named individuals].” A178. As the District Court
recognized, this is a definable class that includes Ms. Maxwell. A144³ (“[T]he co-
conspirator provision...cover[s] any involvement of Maxwell in offenses committed
by Epstein from 2001 to 2007, other offenses that were the subject of the FBI and
³ To the extent that the Government suggests that Ms. Maxwell is not a co-
conspirator within the meaning of the NPA, the trial evidence demonstrated,
according to the Government’s main brief, that she was a member of the conspiracies
charged in the indictment from 1994- 2004 in the SDNY and elsewhere. Moreover,
there was significant overlap between the investigation in Florida and the trial.
Specifically, investigators in Florida had interviewed Carolyn (SA86, SA72fn.72;
SA193fn.241), Virginia Roberts (SA173fn.217, SA193fn.240, fn.241), and Annie
Farmer (SA193fn.239).
6
DOJ-OGR-00021754

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document