HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025776.jpg

2.57 MB

Extraction Summary

3
People
5
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Economic research report / standard & poor's publication
File Size: 2.57 MB
Summary

This document is page 14 of a Standard & Poor's economic research report dated August 5, 2014, discussing the economic impact of income inequality and education in the United States. It analyzes the ROI of college financial aid, historical trends in graduation rates citing researchers Goldin and Katz, and the potential long-term GDP growth from investing in universal preschool. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was included in a document production to the House Oversight Committee, likely as part of a broader investigation into financial institutions.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Goldin Researcher/Academic
Cited for arguments regarding U.S. education history and graduation rates.
Katz Researcher/Academic
Cited alongside Goldin for arguments regarding U.S. education history.
Golden Researcher/Academic
Typo in document referring to Goldin; noted regarding high school graduation rates plateauing in the 1970s.

Organizations (5)

Name Type Context
Standard & Poor's
Publisher of the report (indicated by footer URL).
College Board
Source of data regarding the price of a college degree in 2012.
OECD
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development; used as a benchmark for student literacy.
The Brookings Institution
Research group cited regarding the economic impact of universal preschool.
House Oversight Committee
Recipient/Processor of the document (indicated by Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT).

Timeline (3 events)

1939-1945
World War II
Global
2003
Program for International Assessment (PISA)
International
U.S. 15-year-olds
2012
College Board pricing report
USA

Locations (1)

Location Context
Primary focus of the economic research.

Relationships (1)

Goldin Academic Co-authors Katz
Referred to jointly in the text ('Goldin and Katz argue...', 'Golden and Katz note...').

Key Quotes (3)

"Given a college graduate is expected to earn about $30,000 more per year than a high school graduate over the course of their life, the benefits outweigh the costs."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025776.jpg
Quote #1
"That educational slowdown is likely the most important reason for increased education wage differentials since 1980 and is a major contributor to income inequality today."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025776.jpg
Quote #2
"The Brookings Institution has found that a high-quality universal preschool program, costing about $59 billion, could add $2 trillion in annual U.S. GDP by 2080."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025776.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (3,998 characters)

Economic Research: How Increasing Income Inequality Is Dampening U.S. Economic Growth, And Possible Ways To Change The Tide
there? This will likely require some investment in the human capital of the U.S. workforce, today and tomorrow. But studies have indicated that the benefits greatly outweigh the costs. Researchers estimate that, depending on the exact program, $1,000 in college aid results in a 3- to 6-percentage-point increase in college enrollment, with the total cost in aid averaging $20,000 to $30,000 to send one student to college (32). Given a college graduate is expected to earn about $30,000 more per year than a high school graduate over the course of their life, the benefits outweigh the costs. It also this means more tax revenue from higher income than otherwise would have been the case.
Other new low-cost interventions, like simpler financial aid applications, more outreach about financial aid options that are available to students from low-income households, as well as offering college mentors to students, could help send more kids to school and encourage them to stay once they get there (33). Indeed, while the sticker price of a college degree is high, according to the College Board in 2012, the actual price paid after financial aid is often lower. That may be enough to encourage more low-income families to enroll.
While most agree that increasing college graduation rates would be a boon for economic growth, what about education before college? Goldin and Katz argue that the U.S. had "pioneered" free and accessible elementary education for most of its citizens and extended its lead into high school education when other countries were introducing mass elementary school education (34). After World War II, U.S. universities were known to be the best in the world. But by the early 1970s, Golden and Katz note that high school graduation rates plateaued and have been relatively flat for more than three decades, and college graduation rates slid backwards. That educational slowdown is likely the most important reason for increased education wage differentials since 1980 and is a major contributor to income inequality today.
Even if the U.S. government offers financial aid for college, many high school graduates aren't prepared for the rigors of university education. The 2003 Program for International Assessment (PISA), for one, showed U.S. 15-year-olds to be substantially below the OECD average in mathematics literacy, problem solving, and scientific literacy (35).
Increasing aptitude in early education has been discussed in a number of studies. Most point to increasing the quality of K-12 education to improve high school graduation rates and postsecondary education (36). Some have argued that inadequate investments by states and local governments in education have weakened the ability of a state to develop, grow, and attract businesses that offer high-skilled, high-wage jobs (37). The Brookings Institution has found that a high-quality universal preschool program, costing about $59 billion, could add $2 trillion in annual U.S. GDP by 2080. This additional growth would generate enough federal revenue to easily cover its costs several times over (38). However, the authors note that it is difficult to win support for a short-term investment, like preschool programs, given the long-term nature of its benefits to the economy.
Catching Up With The Joneses
As income inequality increased before the crisis, less affluent households took on more and more debt to keep up--or, in this case, catch up--with the Joneses, first by purchasing a new home. Further, when home prices climbed, these households were willing to borrow against their newfound equity--and financial institutions were increasingly willing to help them do so, despite slow income growth. A number of economists have pointed to ways in which this trend may
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
AUGUST 5, 2014 14
1351366 | 302136118
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025776

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document