DOJ-OGR-00013298.jpg
598 KB
Extraction Summary
7
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
598 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The text details a legal debate regarding the admissibility of Government Exhibit 761, an application to the Professional Children's School for a minor referred to as 'Jane.' The prosecution and the Judge discuss whether the document is admissible as a business record, specifically noting that the application listed Jeffrey Epstein as a financial guarantor, which the Court deemed relevant to show the family's perception of Epstein's financial support.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, ruling on objections regarding evidence admissibility.
|
| Ms. Sternheim | Defense Attorney |
Attorney for the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell), acknowledging the court's statement.
|
| Ms. Menninger | Prosecutor |
Addressing the court regarding Government Exhibit 761 and objections related to verification of information.
|
| Jane | Subject of Application |
Pseudonym for a minor/victim; subject of a Professional Children's School application (Exhibit 761).
|
| Lieberman | Legal Reference/Person |
Referenced by Ms. Menninger in comparison to the current legal argument.
|
| Mr. Epstein | Financial Guarantor |
Jeffrey Epstein; mentioned as the person indicated to be providing financial assistance on Jane's school application.
|
| Mr. Rohrbach | Prosecutor |
Adding a legal argument regarding 'adoptive business records'.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Professional Children's School |
The institution where 'Jane' applied, the application to which is Government Exhibit 761.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Transcription service listed in the footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00013298).
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Court hearing regarding the admissibility of Government Exhibit 761.
Courtroom (Southern District of New York)
Relationships (1)
Transcript states Jane's family indicated Epstein was providing financial assistance/was a financial guarantor for her school application.
Key Quotes (3)
"Government Exhibit 761 was offered, it was a Professional Children's School application for Jane."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013298.jpg
Quote #1
"the relevance was that the witness or her family was indicating that Mr. Epstein was providing financial assistance at the time"Source
DOJ-OGR-00013298.jpg
Quote #2
"if a company receives a record created by an outsider and integrates it into their files and relies on it, it becomes a record of that business."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013298.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,601 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 20 of 262 1725
LC8Cmax1
LC8Cmax1
1 THE COURT: I think we're on the same page in terms of
2 the law and in terms of what is the factual record with respect
3 to the employer's practice at the time of their filing any
4 information provided by employees.
5 MS. STERNHEIM: Thank you.
6 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, may I briefly address
7 something?
8 THE COURT: Sure.
9 MS. MENNINGER: Government Exhibit 761 was offered, it
10 was a Professional Children's School application for Jane. I
11 elicited testimony from the offer award that he did not verify
12 the information pertaining, for example, to the financial
13 guarantor, and I objected to the admission of that for the same
14 reasons your Honor is articulating for Lieberman.
15 THE COURT: So I overruled that objection because,
16 what seemed to me, the relevance was that the witness or her
17 family was indicating that Mr. Epstein was providing financial
18 assistance at the time, whether or not he was providing
19 financial assistance at the time.
20 MR. ROHRBACH: I would also note, your Honor, that in
21 addition to the verification line of business records cases,
22 there is another line of cases of adoptive business records
23 which say that if a company receives a record created by an
24 outsider and integrates it into their files and relies on it,
25 it becomes a record of that business. I haven't so far
2 the law and in terms of what is the factual record with respect
3 to the employer's practice at the time of their filing any
4 information provided by employees.
5 MS. STERNHEIM: Thank you.
6 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, may I briefly address
7 something?
8 THE COURT: Sure.
9 MS. MENNINGER: Government Exhibit 761 was offered, it
10 was a Professional Children's School application for Jane. I
11 elicited testimony from the offer award that he did not verify
12 the information pertaining, for example, to the financial
13 guarantor, and I objected to the admission of that for the same
14 reasons your Honor is articulating for Lieberman.
15 THE COURT: So I overruled that objection because,
16 what seemed to me, the relevance was that the witness or her
17 family was indicating that Mr. Epstein was providing financial
18 assistance at the time, whether or not he was providing
19 financial assistance at the time.
20 MR. ROHRBACH: I would also note, your Honor, that in
21 addition to the verification line of business records cases,
22 there is another line of cases of adoptive business records
23 which say that if a company receives a record created by an
24 outsider and integrates it into their files and relies on it,
25 it becomes a record of that business. I haven't so far
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013298
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document