This is page 40 of a court transcript (Document 782, filed Jan 15, 2025) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The witness, Rocchio (likely Dr. Lisa Rocchio), is under direct examination discussing the differences between clinical and forensic psychology roles, specifically noting that in a clinical setting, she does not verify the truth of a victim's report via external evidence like newspaper articles. She testifies that there is 'remarkable consistency' regarding grooming tactics across her clinical work, forensic work, and scientific literature.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Rocchio | Witness / Expert |
Testifying on direct examination regarding clinical vs. forensic practices and grooming tactics. (Likely Dr. Lisa Roc...
|
| Unidentified Attorney (Q) | Examiner |
Asking questions during direct examination.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Listed in footer with phone number (212) 805-0300.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice, implied by 'DOJ-OGR' stamp in footer.
|
"So in a clinical setting, it is not my role to determine whether something is or is not true."Source
"I don't go and ask them to provide me with newspaper articles to verify whether that event happened."Source
"There's remarkable consistency in what I see in my work over time in my forensic practice, my clinical practice and what I have been trained and what's in the literature."Source
"So there have been a number of studies over time that have looked at the tactics, modus operandi, skill, manipulative techniques that have been used by perpetrators."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,572 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document