DOJ-OGR-00009241.jpg

986 KB

Extraction Summary

5
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 986 KB
Summary

This document is a condensed court transcript from the case 'United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas', filed as an exhibit in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330). It features the cross-examination of a witness, Ms. Conrad, regarding her alcohol consumption (specifically 'cheap vodka') and her behavior during a previous court appearance before Judge Pauley on December 20th. The testimony highlights erratic statements Conrad previously made to Judge Pauley, including comments about his intelligence, his attendance at Duke University, and his potential desire for a 'Clinton appointment'.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Ms. Conrad Witness
Being questioned about her alcohol consumption and previous behavior in court.
Paul M. Daugerdas Defendant
Named in the case caption (United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas).
Judge Pauley Judge
Presided over a previous appearance on December 20th; attended Duke University.
Mr. Okula Attorney
Raises an objection regarding questions about Duke football.
Clinton Political Figure
Mentioned in a quote by Ms. Conrad regarding judicial appointments.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Duke University
Judge Pauley's alma mater; subject of Ms. Conrad's comments regarding the football team.
Southern District Reporters
Transcription service identified in the footer.
DOJ
Department of Justice, indicated by the DOJ-OGR stamp.

Timeline (3 events)

December 20
Previous court appearance where Ms. Conrad allegedly made outbursts.
Federal Courthouse
February 15, 2012
Court testimony of Ms. Conrad regarding her sobriety and previous conduct.
Courtroom
Ms. Conrad Mr. Okula The Court
January 8
Date Ms. Conrad recalls last drinking before the current incident.
Unknown

Locations (1)

Location Context
Location of the hearings.

Relationships (1)

Ms. Conrad Legal/Adversarial Judge Pauley
Conrad appeared before Pauley and made insulting remarks about his intelligence and political ambitions.

Key Quotes (5)

"You're being very stupid, Judge, and I know you went to Duke and God bless you because I love all the players there..."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009241.jpg
Quote #1
"If you want another Clinton appointment, it's not going to happen."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009241.jpg
Quote #2
"I know, they're sort of losers, but that's okay."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009241.jpg
Quote #3
"I believe it was caused by a subpoena that I had to appear here, sir."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009241.jpg
Quote #4
"How is it that you remember the date Sunday, January 8th? Because alcoholics generally do that."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009241.jpg
Quote #5

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (4,602 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 616-20 Filed 02/24/22 Page 19 of 67
A-5637
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v
PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,
February 15, 2012
[Page 109]
C2FFDAU4 Conrad - direct Page 109
1 know whether you have a reason for doing or not?
2 A. I'm not sure how to answer that if you're not a
3 psychologist.
4 Q. Had you been drinking this morning, Ms. Conrad?
5 A. No.
6 Q. When was the last time you were drinking?
7 A. Last night.
8 Q. How much did you have to drink last night?
9 A. A cup and a half, maybe.
10 Q. Of?
11 A. A liquor.
12 Q. What kind of liquor?
13 A. A very cheap vodka.
14 Q. And before that when was the last time you had been
15 drinking?
16 A. Sunday, January 8th.
17 Q. How is it that you remember the date Sunday, January 8th?
18 A. Because alcoholics generally do that.
19 Q. Now, Ms. Conrad, you last appeared in the federal
20 courthouse on December 20th to appear before Judge Pauley and
21 received instructions, is that correct?
22 A. Yes, you're correct.
23 Q. Now, during that court appearance, were you intoxicated?
24 A. No.
25 Q. Had you had anything to drink?
[Page 110]
C2FFDAU4 Conrad - direct Page 110
1 A. No.
2 Q. When was the last time before your court appearance on
3 December 20th that you had anything to drink?
4 A. The night before.
5 Q. And had the effects of that alcohol worn off by the time
6 you arrived in court at noon on December 20th?
7 A. Yes.
8 Q. And so whatever you did in that court appearance on
9 December 20th was not caused by alcohol intoxication, is that
10 correct?
11 A. I believe it was caused by a subpoena that I had to appear
12 here, sir.
13 Q. The things that you said to the Court on that day were not
14 influenced by being intoxicated at the time, is that correct?
15 A. I believe you're correct.
16 Q. And was your behavior, would you characterize your behavior
17 as rational or irrational?
18 A. I can't answer that. That's in your eyes, sir.
19 Q. Now, do you recall that you received some instructions from
20 the Court?
21 A. I don't know what you're talking about. When?
22 Q. On December 20th did you receive some instructions from
23 Judge Pauley?
24 A. Of course. I received a subpoena.
25 Q. And Judge Pauley ordered you to appear today, is that
[Page 111]
C2FFDAU4 Conrad - direct Page 111
1 correct?
2 A. Yes, I'm here.
3 Q. And do you remember you made some statements at that time.
4 A. I'm sure I did. Thank you.
5 Q. Did you say, and I quote, "You're being very stupid, Judge,
6 and I know you went to Duke and God bless you because I love
7 all the players there, but, you know, come on, this is anything
8 in favor of the defendants and they brought the motion against
9 the prosecution. It's ridiculous. If you want another Clinton
10 appointment, it's not going to happen."
11 A. I absolutely said that. Thank you for refreshing my
12 recollection.
13 Q. Now, let me break that down a little bit. When you said,
14 "You're being very stupid, Judge," what were you referring to?
15 A. I don't recall.
16 Q. Well, were you referring to anything?
17 A. I don't recall.
18 Q. And when you said, "I know you went to Duke and God bless
19 you," what were you referring to there?
20 A. I like his football team.
21 Q. You like Duke's football team?
22 A. Yes, sir.
23 Q. You mean its basketball team?
24 A. No. Football.
25 Q. You like Duke's football?
[Page 112]
C2FFDAU4 Conrad - direct Page 112
1 A. I know, they're sort of losers, but that's okay.
2 Q. Is that what you like about them?
3 A. I'm not going to answer this.
4 MR. OKULA: Objection, your Honor. Why she likes the
5 Duke football team?
6 THE COURT: Sustained.
7 Q. Are you under the impression as you sit up there today that
8 you are the judge of deciding what questions you will and you
9 will not answer?
10 A. No, sir.
11 Q. And yet that's what you just did, correct?
12 A. I think even yourself sees the ridiculosity (sic) of that
13 question.
14 Q. Let me try to repeat that question again. Didn't you just
15 state, contrary to your own knowledge of legal procedures, that
16 you were not going to answer my question?
17 A. I don't understand your question. I'm sorry.
18 Q. Now, do you feel like you have the same level of
19 understanding of what's going on around you today that you had
20 during the trial?
21 A. I don't understand the meaning of that question.
22 Q. Now, can you explain to us what Judge Pauley having
23 attended Duke University had to do with the discussion about
24 your appearing for a hearing today?
25 A. Absolutely nothing.
Page 109 - Page 112 (28) SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS
DOJ-OGR-00009241

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document