DOJ-OGR-00014990.jpg

611 KB

Extraction Summary

2
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript (cross-examination)
File Size: 611 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript involving the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio (likely an expert witness). The questioning focuses on the witness's academic or professional definition of 'grooming,' noting that while they haven't published a specific definition, they rely on common literature. The dialogue references a list of '77 specific behaviors' associated with grooming and debates whether intent and context determine if an act constitutes grooming.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Rocchio Witness
Subject to cross-examination; testifying as an expert regarding the definition and behaviors of 'grooming'.
Unidentified Attorney (Q) Interrogator
Conducting the cross-examination, questioning the witness's publications and definitions.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
DOJ
Department of Justice (referenced in Bates stamp DOJ-OGR)

Timeline (1 events)

Prior to this testimony
Witness presented a list of 77 behaviors identified in literature as grooming.
Courtroom

Locations (1)

Location Context
Jurisdiction of the court (likely SDNY based on case number format)

Relationships (1)

Rocchio Adversarial/Legal Defense Counsel
Cross-examination format (Q&A) challenging the witness's expertise and definitions.

Key Quotes (5)

"It's a common definition and the one I'm using in my testimony, yes."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014990.jpg
Quote #1
"Specifically about grooming, no. But I have certainly published and made reference to grooming."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014990.jpg
Quote #2
"Those were 77 specific behaviors that had been identified in the literature as potentially being part of the grooming process, yes."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014990.jpg
Quote #3
"It would depend on the pattern of behavior and the context in which it's occurring."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014990.jpg
Quote #4
"Because what you're saying is, it depends on the groomer's intent in doing a specific act is what, in your view, makes it grooming or not"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014990.jpg
Quote #5

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,609 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 782 Filed 01/15/25 Page 114 of 158 114
LBAGmax4 Rocchio - Cross
1 Q. And is that your definition?
2 A. It's my understanding of the definitions that have been
3 talked about in the literature. I mean, I haven't written and
4 published a specific set definition. It's a common definition
5 and the one I'm using in my testimony, yes.
6 Q. I was going to ask you that question. You have not
7 published anything specifically about grooming; correct?
8 A. Specifically about grooming, no. But I have certainly
9 published and made reference to grooming.
10 Q. And you have not done any metadata studies on your own to
11 collect data about grooming; correct?
12 A. Correct.
13 Q. Grooming can consist of the actions that you're talking
14 about, can consist of -- I think we saw a list of 77 things on
15 it as part of your testimony; is that right?
16 A. Those were 77 specific behaviors that had been identified
17 in the literature as potentially being part of the grooming
18 process, yes.
19 Q. But I think we were talking about things like taking an
20 interest in another human being could be considered grooming?
21 A. Not in and of itself. It would depend on the pattern of
22 behavior and the context in which it's occurring.
23 Q. Let's talk about that for a second. Because what you're
24 saying is, it depends on the groomer's intent in doing a
25 specific act is what, in your view, makes it grooming or not
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014990

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document