DOJ-OGR-00016755.jpg

550 KB

Extraction Summary

5
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 550 KB
Summary

This document is page 26 of a court transcript from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on August 10, 2022. The Judge is issuing rulings regarding the admissibility of prior statements made by witnesses 'Jane' and 'Annie' to determine if they constitute inconsistencies for impeachment. The court rules that several statements regarding details such as a timeline, the presence of a chef, and the amount of horseback riding are either not inconsistent or are collateral matters.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Ms. Comey Prosecutor/Attorney
Confirming the scope of statements addressed by the court.
Ms. Menninger Defense Attorney
Clarifying agreements made between parties regarding the record.
The Court Judge
Issuing rulings (sustained) on the admissibility of witness statements.
Jane Witness/Victim
Subject of prior statements being reviewed for inconsistency.
Annie Witness/Victim
Subject of transcript review regarding recollections of a chef and horseback riding.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
DOJ
Indicated by footer stamp DOJ-OGR
Southern District of New York
Implied by case number and reporter location

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
Court proceedings in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), specifically rulings on witness testimony inconsistencies.
Southern District of New York Courtroom

Relationships (1)

Ms. Comey Opposing Counsel Ms. Menninger
Dialogue in court transcript

Key Quotes (3)

"Annie said she didn't recall a chef, but, quote, that makes sense to me that there was a chef there, quote."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016755.jpg
Quote #1
"testimony is not inconsistent, and the amount of horseback riding is collateral."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016755.jpg
Quote #2
"Transcript at 2151, sustained. She acknowledged the statement but said she didn't recall making it. So there is no inference of inconsistency."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016755.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,346 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 26 of 197 2567
LCFCmax1
1 timeline, which she said she does not remember and is not a
2 basis for inconsistency and it goes to a collateral matter.
3 532, sustained. Statement was read aloud.
4 596, sustained, the statement was read aloud.
5 That's, I believe, all of the Jane statements; is that
6 correct?
7 MS. COMEY: Yes, your Honor.
8 MS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor. The parties had
9 agreed to a few either being in or out before we submitted
10 this, so those are part of the record your Honor just gave, but
11 the parties know what they are.
12 MS. COMEY: Yes, your Honor.
13 THE COURT: Thank you, Ms. Menninger, for that
14 clarification.
15 Next, Annie.
16 Transcript at 2151, sustained. She acknowledged the
17 statement but said she didn't recall making it. So there is no
18 inference of inconsistency.
19 Transcript at 2160 to 61, sustained. Annie said --
20 there is not an inconsistency. Annie said she didn't recall a
21 chef, but, quote, that makes sense to me that there was a chef
22 there, quote. It also goes only to a collateral issue.
23 Transcript at 2165 to 66, sustained. Statement was
24 already read out loud, testimony is not inconsistent, and the
25 amount of horseback riding is collateral.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016755

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document