This document is page 26 of a court transcript from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on August 10, 2022. The Judge is issuing rulings regarding the admissibility of prior statements made by witnesses 'Jane' and 'Annie' to determine if they constitute inconsistencies for impeachment. The court rules that several statements regarding details such as a timeline, the presence of a chef, and the amount of horseback riding are either not inconsistent or are collateral matters.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Comey | Prosecutor/Attorney |
Confirming the scope of statements addressed by the court.
|
| Ms. Menninger | Defense Attorney |
Clarifying agreements made between parties regarding the record.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Issuing rulings (sustained) on the admissibility of witness statements.
|
| Jane | Witness/Victim |
Subject of prior statements being reviewed for inconsistency.
|
| Annie | Witness/Victim |
Subject of transcript review regarding recollections of a chef and horseback riding.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Indicated by footer stamp DOJ-OGR
|
|
| Southern District of New York |
Implied by case number and reporter location
|
"Annie said she didn't recall a chef, but, quote, that makes sense to me that there was a chef there, quote."Source
"testimony is not inconsistent, and the amount of horseback riding is collateral."Source
"Transcript at 2151, sustained. She acknowledged the statement but said she didn't recall making it. So there is no inference of inconsistency."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,346 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document