DOJ-OGR-00000916.jpg

615 KB

Extraction Summary

2
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal filing / court document (appellate brief or motion)
File Size: 615 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 21-770) dated April 1, 2021, outlining legal issues presented for review regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. It argues that her detention conditions—including sleep deprivation, surveillance, solitary confinement, lack of food/water, and inability to review discovery documents—prevent her from effectively preparing a defense. It also challenges the trial court's decision to deny bail based on 'old, anonymous, unconfronted, hearsay accusations' from the government.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant/Appellant
Subject of detention conditions and bail denial arguments; referred to as 'Ms. Maxwell'
Lawyers Defense Counsel
Mentioned as being unable to see Maxwell regularly in person

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Department of Justice
Implied by Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR'
Trial Court
Judicial body accused of erring in bail decision
The Government
Prosecution, provided the proffer used to deny bail

Timeline (2 events)

2021-04-01
Filing of legal document outlining issues regarding Maxwell's detention and bail
Court of Appeals (implied by Case 21-770)
Ghislaine Maxwell Defense Counsel
Ongoing (at time of filing)
Detention of Ghislaine Maxwell under 'horrific conditions'
Detention Facility

Locations (1)

Location Context
Location where Maxwell is held in solitary confinement

Relationships (2)

Ghislaine Maxwell Adversarial The Government
Document argues against government's proffer and detention conditions imposed.
Ghislaine Maxwell Legal Representation Lawyers
Mentions inability to see her lawyers to prepare for trial.

Key Quotes (5)

"Whether Ms. Maxwell can effectively prepare her defense where she is being subjected to horrific conditions of detention during a global pandemic"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000916.jpg
Quote #1
"being kept awake all night to make sure she does not commit suicide even though nothing suggests she is a suicide risk"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000916.jpg
Quote #2
"being stuck in de facto solitary confinement without safe, in person visitation"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000916.jpg
Quote #3
"not consistently provided edible food or drinkable water"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000916.jpg
Quote #4
"Whether the trial court erred by relying on the government’s proffer — which was comprised of nothing but extremely old, anonymous, unconfronted, hearsay accusations — to refuse to set reasonable bail."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000916.jpg
Quote #5

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,277 characters)

Case 21-770, Document 20-1, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page6 of 31
ISSUES PRESENTED
1. Whether Ms. Maxwell can effectively prepare her defense where she is being subjected to horrific conditions of detention during a global pandemic, including:
• not being able to regularly see her lawyers in person to prepare for trial;
• being kept awake all night to make sure she does not commit suicide even though nothing suggests she is a suicide risk;
• having her every movement videotaped on multiple cameras focused on her every move;
• being stuck in de facto solitary confinement without safe, in person visitation;
• being forced to review millions of pages of documents on a stripped down computer without adequate hardware or software such that Ms. Maxwell cannot open tens of thousands of pages of discovery and for those she can open, only has the ability to review them one page at a time and cannot search, edit, copy, or print;
• having no writing surface in her solitary cell; and
• not consistently provided edible food or drinkable water.
2. Whether the trial court erred by relying on the government’s proffer — which was comprised of nothing but extremely old, anonymous, unconfronted, hearsay accusations — to refuse to set reasonable bail.
4
DOJ-OGR-00000916

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document