This document consists of a Docketing Notice from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals dated July 8, 2022, for the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426), and a Notice of Appeal and Criminal Docket from the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed July 7, 2022. It details Maxwell's conviction and sentencing, including multi-year imprisonment terms and a $750,000 fine for charges related to conspiracy to entice minors for illegal sex acts, transport minors for sexual activity, and sex trafficking, with some counts dismissed or deemed multiplicitous.
This document contains a docketing notice from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding Jeffrey Epstein's appeal (19-2221) from a District Court decision (1:19-cr-490-1), dated July 23, 2019. It also includes the Notice of Appeal filed on July 22, 2019, detailing Epstein's legal representation and the pending charges of sex trafficking conspiracy and sex trafficking of children. The document lists multiple attorneys representing Jeffrey Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office representing the USA.
This document is a Grand Jury Subpoena issued by the SDNY on January 19, 2021, commanding a redacted individual to testify on February 25, 2021. The investigation concerns alleged violations of federal laws regarding sex trafficking (1591), transportation for illegal sexual activity (2421-2423), conspiracy (371), and perjury (1623). The package includes a cover letter requesting non-disclosure of the subpoena and an Advice of Rights form.
This document is a letter motion filed on July 25, 2025, by National Security Counselors on behalf of MSW Media, Inc. to intervene in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The motion concerns the unsealing of grand jury transcripts, triggered by an instruction from President Trump to Attorney General Pam Bondi. MSW Media seeks to ensure that while victim information is protected, the identities of the Defendant's 'partners in crime or clients' are not redacted under the guise of privacy.
This document is a criminal docket sheet from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case USA v. Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on June 29, 2020. It identifies Ghislaine Maxwell as the defendant and lists her legal counsel, including five attorneys from various law firms in New York and Denver. The case was assigned to Judge Alison J. Nathan.
This document is a criminal docket entry from the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, for case # 1:19-cr-00490-RMB, titled 'USA v. Epstein,' filed on July 2, 2019. It identifies Jeffrey Epstein as Defendant (1) and lists five attorneys representing him, along with their respective law firms and contact information. Judge Richard M. Berman is assigned to the case.
This document is a criminal docket sheet from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case USA v. Maxwell, case number 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. It identifies the movant, Jordana H. Feldman, and the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, along with their respective legal counsel and the assigned judge, Alison J. Nathan. The document provides key case dates, including the filing date of June 29, 2020, and the termination date of June 29, 2022.
This document is a criminal docket sheet from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case USA v. Maxwell (Case #: 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The case was filed on June 29, 2020, and terminated on June 29, 2022. The document identifies the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, a movant, Jordana H. Feldman, the assigned judge, Alison J. Nathan, and the legal counsel for both Maxwell and Feldman, along with their contact information.
This document is a page from the Criminal Docket for Case # 1:20-cr-00330-AJN-1, USA v. Maxwell, filed on June 29, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It lists Ghislaine Maxwell as the defendant (also noted as Sealed Defendant 1) and details her legal defense team, including attorneys Christian R. Everdell, Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, and Mark Stewart Cohen, along with their contact information.
This document is page 3 of a criminal docket for the case USA v. Maxwell (Case #: 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It lists the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, her defense attorneys, and pending conspiracy counts related to enticing minors to engage in illegal sex acts.
This document is a page from the criminal docket of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of USA v. Maxwell. It lists the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, her legal representation team, and the pending conspiracy counts against her.
This document is a criminal docket sheet for the case of USA v. Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-AJN) from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on June 29, 2020. It identifies Ghislaine Maxwell as the defendant and lists her extensive legal team, including five attorneys from various law firms in New York and Denver. The case was assigned to Judge Alison J. Nathan.
This document is a criminal docket sheet from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on June 29, 2020. The document identifies Ghislaine Maxwell as the defendant, Judge Alison J. Nathan as the presiding judge, and lists the five attorneys representing Maxwell. It also provides the contact information and law firm affiliations for each attorney.
This document is a criminal docket sheet from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case USA v. Maxwell, filed on June 29, 2020. It identifies Ghislaine Maxwell as the defendant and lists her legal representation, including five attorneys from various law firms. The case is assigned to Judge Alison J. Nathan.
This is a page from a court transcript concerning the direct examination of a witness named Schoeman. The testimony details a conversation between Schoeman and Ms. Trzaskoma regarding 'Juror No. 1' (Ms. Conrad). They discussed whether the juror might be a disbarred lawyer with the same name, but concluded she was not based on her educational background revealed during voir dire.
This document is a page from a court transcript showing the direct examination of a witness named Brune. The questioning focuses on a conversation at Foley Square and whether a 'Ms. Edelstein' inquired about a 'suspension opinion'. The transcript captures legal objections from attorneys Mr. Schectman and Ms. Davis regarding the accuracy of a date (May 12th) and leading questions, with the judge clarifying the nature of the objection.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness by Mr. Schoeman. The testimony details a conversation between the witness and Ms. Trzaskoma while walking across Foley Square, concerning Juror No. 1 (Ms. Conrad). They discussed a disbarred lawyer with the same name as the juror but concluded it was a different person because the juror's educational background did not include law school.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving the direct examination of a witness named Brune by Ms. Davis. The testimony centers on a conversation at Foley Square and whether a Ms. Edelstein asked to see a 'suspension opinion.' There is a legal dispute regarding a question about Ms. Trzaskoma informing Mr. Schoeman and Mr. Berke about a suspension issue on May 12th, with the defense objecting to the accuracy of the date and the prosecution arguing they are permitted to lead an adverse witness.
This document is a court transcript from a direct examination of a witness named Brune, filed on February 24, 2022. Brune testifies about their knowledge of research conducted by Ms. Trzaskoma, stating they became aware of it on May 18th but knew on May 12th that she had found a disciplinary decision on Google. The transcript details a conversation on May 12th between Brune, Ms. Trzaskoma, and Ms. Edelstein that occurred after court near Foley Square.
This is a formal order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dated April 27, 2021. The court affirmed previous District Court orders denying bail for Ghislaine Maxwell and denied her motion for temporary pretrial release. The document also notes that Maxwell's counsel raised concerns about sleep deprivation during incarceration, but the appellate court directed those specific concerns back to the District Court.
This document is a civil docket report from the U.S. District Court (SDNY) for Case #: 1:16-cv-04642-RA, filed on June 20, 2016. The case involves a plaintiff proceeding under the pseudonym 'Jane Doe' suing Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey E. Epstein for Libel, Assault, and Slander. The document lists the initial filing of the complaint, the payment of filing fees, and requests for summonses for both defendants.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity