DOJ-OGR-00000117.tif
33.3 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
6
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document / court filing excerpt
File Size:
33.3 KB
Summary
This document outlines several motions made by 'Maxwell' in a legal proceeding, including motions to dismiss perjury counts, sever counts, strike indictment language, compel discovery, and dismiss all counts related to grand jury indictments. It also states that Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement from September 2007 does not prevent the current prosecution.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of several motions regarding perjury, Mann Act, indictment language, discovery, and dismissal of counts.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Subject of non-prosecution agreement |
Entered into an NPA in September 2007.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court |
Making decisions on Maxwell's motions.
|
|
| Government |
Opposing party in Maxwell's motions, ordered to confer on discovery.
|
|
| Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern |
Party to Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement.
|
Timeline (1 events)
September 2007
Jeffrey Epstein entered into a non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with the Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern, under investigation by federal and state authorities.
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where S1 superseding indictment was returned by a grand jury.
|
|
|
Location where S2 superseding indictment was returned by a grand jury.
|
Relationships (3)
Maxwell moves to compel the Government to disclose evidence.
Jeffrey Epstein
→
Party to non-prosecution agreement
→
Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern
Epstein entered into an NPA with the Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern.
Key Quotes (6)
"Maxwell moves to dismiss the perjury counts because, in her view, her testimony responded to ambiguous questioning and was not material. The Court concludes that these issues are best left for the jury."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000117.tif
Quote #1
"Maxwell moves to sever the perjury counts from the Mann Act counts so that they can proceed in a separate trial. The Court concludes that severance is appropriate and will try the perjury counts separately."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000117.tif
Quote #2
"Maxwell moves to strike language from the indictment that she believes is superfluous and to dismiss conspiracy counts she believes are redundant. The Court concludes that these motions are premature before trial."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000117.tif
Quote #3
"Maxwell moves to compel the Government to immediately disclose certain categories of evidence. The Court concludes that she is not entitled to do so, but the Court will order Maxwell and the Government to confer on a discovery schedule."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000117.tif
Quote #4
"Maxwell moves to dismiss all counts because a grand jury in White Plains, rather than Manhattan, returned the S1 superseding indictment. Because a jury in Manhattan returned the S2 superseding indictment, the motion appears moot."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000117.tif
Quote #5
"Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement does not bar this prosecution"Source
DOJ-OGR-00000117.tif
Quote #6
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,404 characters)
54a
• Maxwell moves to dismiss the perjury counts
because, in her view, her testimony responded to
ambiguous questioning and was not material.
The Court concludes that these issues are best
left for the jury.
• Maxwell moves to sever the perjury counts from
the Mann Act counts so that they can proceed
in a separate trial. The Court concludes that
severance is appropriate and will try the
perjury counts separately.
• Maxwell moves to strike language from the
indictment that she believes is superfluous and
to dismiss conspiracy counts she believes are
redundant. The Court concludes that these
motions are premature before trial.
• Maxwell moves to compel the Government to
immediately disclose certain categories of
evidence. The Court concludes that she is not
entitled to do so, but the Court will order
Maxwell and the Government to confer on a
discovery schedule.
• Maxwell moves to dismiss all counts because
a grand jury in White Plains, rather than
Manhattan, returned the S1 superseding
indictment. Because a jury in Manhattan
returned the S2 superseding indictment, the
motion appears moot.
I. Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement
does not bar this prosecution
In September 2007, under investigation by both
federal and state authorities, Jeffrey Epstein entered
into a non-prosecution agreement ("NPA") with the
Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern
DOJ-OGR-00000117
• Maxwell moves to dismiss the perjury counts
because, in her view, her testimony responded to
ambiguous questioning and was not material.
The Court concludes that these issues are best
left for the jury.
• Maxwell moves to sever the perjury counts from
the Mann Act counts so that they can proceed
in a separate trial. The Court concludes that
severance is appropriate and will try the
perjury counts separately.
• Maxwell moves to strike language from the
indictment that she believes is superfluous and
to dismiss conspiracy counts she believes are
redundant. The Court concludes that these
motions are premature before trial.
• Maxwell moves to compel the Government to
immediately disclose certain categories of
evidence. The Court concludes that she is not
entitled to do so, but the Court will order
Maxwell and the Government to confer on a
discovery schedule.
• Maxwell moves to dismiss all counts because
a grand jury in White Plains, rather than
Manhattan, returned the S1 superseding
indictment. Because a jury in Manhattan
returned the S2 superseding indictment, the
motion appears moot.
I. Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement
does not bar this prosecution
In September 2007, under investigation by both
federal and state authorities, Jeffrey Epstein entered
into a non-prosecution agreement ("NPA") with the
Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern
DOJ-OGR-00000117
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document