EFTA00021568.pdf
42.8 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email thread
File Size:
42.8 KB
Summary
This document is an email thread from February 2021 between members of the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The correspondence concerns the finalization of a legal filing titled 'Omnibus Opposition to Defense Motions' (likely regarding Ghislaine Maxwell, denoted by 'GM' in the filename), discussing specific redactions, typos, and the preparation of a redacted version of a July deposition. The names of the senders are redacted, but 'Will' and 'Maurene' are mentioned by name in the text.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Will | Legal Team Member |
Addressed regarding a typo ('nit') in the document.
|
| Maurene | Legal Team Member |
Addressed regarding the creation of a public, redacted version of a July deposition.
|
| Unknown Sender (Bottom Email) | Assistant United States Attorney |
Sender of the request for the working doc; works for SDNY.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District of New York (SDNY) |
Office of the Assistant United States Attorney listed in the signature.
|
|
| Second Circuit |
Court mentioned regarding a public docket quote.
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Address of the United States Attorney's Office, SDNY.
|
Key Quotes (3)
"Did you add the redaction on page 117? ... since it now quotes from the public Second Circuit docket, I think we don't need to redact that bit."Source
EFTA00021568.pdf
Quote #1
"Will, I caught a nit in the first sentence of V.C.I – it says 'Ex. 10 14:9' instead of 'Ex. 10 at 14:9.'"Source
EFTA00021568.pdf
Quote #2
"Maurene, if you still think it's useful to create a public, redacted version of the July depo, I can do that quickly while you finalize."Source
EFTA00021568.pdf
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,265 characters)
From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]
Subject: FW: Working doc
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 02:48:51 +0000
Attachments: 2021.02.26,_GM,_Omnibus_Opposition_to_Defense_Motions_WB_MASTER_COPY.docx
To: [REDACTED]
Subject: FW: Working doc
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 02:48:51 +0000
Attachments: 2021.02.26,_GM,_Omnibus_Opposition_to_Defense_Motions_WB_MASTER_COPY.docx
Hey [REDACTED],
Did you add the redaction on page 117? (It may have been there from an old version this morning.) Either way, since it now quotes from the public Second Circuit docket, I think we don't need to redact that bit.
Will, I caught a nit in the first sentence of V.C.I – it says "Ex. 10 14:9" instead of "Ex. 10 at 14:9."
Otherwise, I am pencils down! (Maurene, if you still think it's useful to create a public, redacted version of the July depo, I can do that quickly while you finalize.)
Thanks,
[REDACTED]
.
[REDACTED]
.
From: [REDACTED]
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 9:17 PM
To: [REDACTED]
Subject: RE: Working doc
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 9:17 PM
To: [REDACTED]
Subject: RE: Working doc
Here you go. Almost done with inputting your edits as well.
-
-
From: [REDACTED]
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 9:14 PM
To: [REDACTED]
Subject: Working doc
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 9:14 PM
To: [REDACTED]
Subject: Working doc
Hey [REDACTED] – would you send me the working doc when you have a second? I’m just taking a quick look at the redactions, no textual changes are coming!
[REDACTED]
Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
1 Saint Andrews Plaza
New York, New York 10007
[REDACTED]
Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
1 Saint Andrews Plaza
New York, New York 10007
[REDACTED]
EFTA00021568
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document