DOJ-OGR-00017313.jpg

555 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript (united states v. ghislaine maxwell)
File Size: 555 KB
Summary

This document is a page from the court transcript of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It details a discussion between the Judge and counsel regarding jury deliberation schedules, followed by the Judge reading a specific note from the jury. The note asks a legal question about 'Count Four,' specifically whether the defendant can be found guilty if she aided in the transportation of a victim named 'Jane' on a return flight, but not the flight to New Mexico, for the purpose of sexual activity.

People (4)

Name Role Context
The Court Judge
Presiding over the proceedings, managing jury schedule, and reading a jury note.
Ms. Sternheim Defense Attorney
Responds to the judge regarding the jury note.
Jane Victim/Witness
Subject of a jury question regarding transportation to New Mexico and sexual activity.
The Defendant Defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell)
Subject of the jury's deliberation on Count Four regarding aiding in transportation.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
US District Court
Implied by the case number 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (SDNY).

Timeline (2 events)

Unknown (During deliberations)
Jury Deliberation Scheduling Discussion
Courtroom
The Court Counsel
Unknown (During deliberations)
Reading of Jury Note regarding Count Four
Courtroom

Locations (1)

Location Context
Destination mentioned in the jury note regarding Jane's flight.

Relationships (1)

The Defendant Alleged Trafficker/Victim Jane
Jury note asking if defendant is guilty if she aided Jane's return flight but not the flight to New Mexico.

Key Quotes (2)

"Under Count Four, if the defendant aided in the transportation of Jane's return flight, but not the flight to New Mexico, where/if the intent was for Jane to engage in sexual activity, can she be found guilty under the second element?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017313.jpg
Quote #1
"I think the question is whether, in light of the circumstances we find ourselves, we should encourage longer, if it's available to them."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017313.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,383 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 773 Filed 08/10/22 Page 9 of 29 3126
LCRVMAXT
1 mind of their own. Because last week the Court invited them to
2 sit the extra day and they declined that. So an inquiry may be
3 appropriate, but I don't think telling them what they should do
4 is necessarily the right thing to do.
5 THE COURT: Well, I have told them previously that
6 they are here till at least 5. I think the question is
7 whether, in light of the circumstances we find ourselves, we
8 should encourage longer, if it's available to them. But you
9 think about it. I'll hear from you. I'm not intending to do
10 anything just yet. I presume we will hear from them as to this
11 evening, but think about the indication of at least some
12 extension of hours tomorrow if they have not completed the
13 task.
14 All right? Thank you.
15 (Recess pending verdict)
16 THE COURT: I have a note.
17 Under Count Four, if the defendant aided in the
18 transportation of Jane's return flight, but not the flight to
19 New Mexico, where/if the intent was for Jane to engage in
20 sexual activity, can she be found guilty under the second
21 element?
22 I'm going to let you take a -- if you want to just
23 take a look at the note. Counsel, you're welcome to take a
24 photo of it, if that helps.
25 MS. STERNHEIM: Thank you.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017313

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document