HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012449.jpg
733 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
4
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Deposition transcript
File Size:
733 KB
Summary
This document is a deposition transcript excerpt, likely from September 29, 2004, where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about evading service of process from Mr. Epstein's process servers. The witness is accused of having an associate named Justin lie on their behalf and of requiring police intervention to be served at a restaurant. The transcript captures the witness's denials, legal objections by their counsel, Mr. Leopold, and sparring between the two attorneys.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE WITNESS | Deponent |
An unnamed individual being questioned about their whereabouts and actions related to being served legal papers.
|
| Justin | Acquaintance of the witness |
Allegedly lied to process servers on behalf of the witness, claiming the witness was not present at a location.
|
| Mr. Epstein | Adverse party in a legal matter |
His process servers were attempting to serve the witness with legal documents.
|
| MR. LEOPOLD | Attorney |
Represents the witness, makes objections, and provides instructions during the deposition.
|
| MR. TEIN | Attorney |
The questioning attorney (deposing the witness).
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Police |
Allegedly asked by Mr. Epstein's process servers to remove the witness from a restaurant to facilitate service of pro...
|
|
| HOUSE_OVERSIGHT |
Appears in the document footer (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012449), possibly indicating the source or collection it belongs to, ...
|
Timeline (3 events)
A deposition of an unnamed witness is conducted by MR. TEIN, with MR. LEOPOLD present as the witness's counsel.
The witness was at a restaurant eating nachos while allegedly evading service of process.
A restaurant (name redacted)
Mr. Epstein's process servers attempted to serve the witness at a restaurant, allegedly having to involve the police.
A restaurant (name redacted)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
Relationships (4)
Mr. Epstein's process servers were attempting to serve the witness with legal documents.
Justin allegedly lied for the witness to help them evade process servers.
MR. LEOPOLD is representing the witness during the deposition, making objections and providing instructions.
They are on opposite sides of the deposition, with MR. TEIN questioning MR. LEOPOLD's client and accusing him of coaching.
Key Quotes (4)
"Isn't it true that Mr. Epstein's process servers had to ask the police to get you out of the restaurant so that they could serve you?"Source
— MR. TEIN (Questioner)
(A direct question accusing the witness of evading service to the point that police intervention was required.)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012449.jpg
Quote #1
"No. I had no influence on him saying I wasn't there."Source
— THE WITNESS (A.)
(The witness's denial of instructing Justin to lie to process servers on their behalf.)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012449.jpg
Quote #2
"MR. LEOPOLD: Objection. Lack of foundation, predicate."Source
— MR. LEOPOLD
(A legal objection made by the witness's attorney to a question from MR. TEIN.)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012449.jpg
Quote #3
"MR. TEIN: Don't coach."Source
— MR. TEIN
(The questioning attorney accusing the witness's attorney of improperly guiding the witness's testimony.)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012449.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (971 characters)
~0929104.TXT
63
1 Q. Where were you when Justin told this
2 someone that you were not at the [REDACTED]?
3 A. Eating nachos.
4 Q. At the [REDACTED]?
5 A. Yes.
6 Q. What did you do so that Justin would lie to
7 the process servers for you?
8 A. Nothing.
9 Q. You just got him to lie for you, didn't
10 you?
11 A. No. I had no influence on him saying I
12 wasn't there.
13 Q. He took that upon himself?
14 Isn't it true that Mr. Epstein's process
15 servers had to ask the police to get you out of the
16 restaurant so that they could serve you?
17 MR. LEOPOLD: Objection. Lack of
18 foundation, predicate.
19 BY MR. TEIN:
20 Q. You can answer the question.
21 MR. LEOPOLD: If you know. Don't guess.
22 THE WITNESS: No. Can you repeat the
23 question?
24 MR. TEIN: Don't coach.
25 MR. LEOPOLD: Don't guess.
63
1 Q. Where were you when Justin told this
2 someone that you were not at the [REDACTED]?
3 A. Eating nachos.
4 Q. At the [REDACTED]?
5 A. Yes.
6 Q. What did you do so that Justin would lie to
7 the process servers for you?
8 A. Nothing.
9 Q. You just got him to lie for you, didn't
10 you?
11 A. No. I had no influence on him saying I
12 wasn't there.
13 Q. He took that upon himself?
14 Isn't it true that Mr. Epstein's process
15 servers had to ask the police to get you out of the
16 restaurant so that they could serve you?
17 MR. LEOPOLD: Objection. Lack of
18 foundation, predicate.
19 BY MR. TEIN:
20 Q. You can answer the question.
21 MR. LEOPOLD: If you know. Don't guess.
22 THE WITNESS: No. Can you repeat the
23 question?
24 MR. TEIN: Don't coach.
25 MR. LEOPOLD: Don't guess.
64
1 MR. TEIN: That's a coaching.
2 MR. LEOPOLD: No. That's an instruction to
3 the client.
4 MR. TEIN: No. You don't do that.
Page 54
1 MR. TEIN: That's a coaching.
2 MR. LEOPOLD: No. That's an instruction to
3 the client.
4 MR. TEIN: No. You don't do that.
Page 54
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012449
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document