HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013478.jpg

1.27 MB

Extraction Summary

6
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal filing (motion for settlement conference/mediation)
File Size: 1.27 MB
Summary

This document is page 3 of a legal filing entered on June 28, 2010, in the case of Doe v. Epstein (Case No. 08-CIV-80893). Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys request a court order for a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson or further mediation with Rodney Romano before July 1, 2010. The Rule 7.1 Certification indicates that the Plaintiff's counsel opposes this request, stating that mediation requirements have already been met.

People (6)

Name Role Context
Jeffrey Epstein Defendant
Requesting the court to order a settlement conference or mediation.
Jane Doe Plaintiff
Opposing party in Doe v. Epstein (implied by case name).
Linnea R. Johnson Magistrate Judge
Judge requested to oversee the settlement conference; described as familiar with the case.
Rodney Romano Mediator
Previous mediator in the case; suggested for further mediation.
Robert D. Critton, Jr. Attorney
Attorney for Defendant Epstein; signatory of the document.
Michael J. Pike Attorney
Attorney for Defendant Epstein.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
FLSD
United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (implied by Docket header).
House Oversight Committee
Source of the document stamp (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013478).

Timeline (1 events)

2010-07-01
Proposed deadline for Settlement Conference or Mediation requested by Defendant.
Southern District of Florida
Jeffrey Epstein Plaintiff Magistrate Judge Johnson Rodney Romano

Locations (1)

Location Context
Jurisdiction of the court case.

Relationships (2)

Jeffrey Epstein Client/Attorney Robert D. Critton, Jr.
Signed as 'Attorneys for Defendant Epstein'
Jeffrey Epstein Litigant/Mediator Rodney Romano
Described as 'the mediator in this case'

Key Quotes (3)

"Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN respectfully requests the Court to enter an Order directing the parties to attend a Settlement Conference"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013478.jpg
Quote #1
"Plaintiff’s position is that the parties have already complied with the mediation requirements."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013478.jpg
Quote #2
"Both Magistrate Judge Johnson and Rodney Romano (as the mediator in this case) are very familiar with the particular case and other claims that were asserted."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013478.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,520 characters)

Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 168 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/28/2010 Page 3 of 4
Doe v. Epstein
CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON
Page 3
believes that a settlement conference or mediation is in the best interest of both parties to
attempt resolution. There is no prejudice to either party.
7. Therefore, Defendant requests the Court issue an order directing the parties to
attend a Settlement Conference before Magistrate Judge Johnson or that the Court direct
the parties to attend a further mediation before July 1, 2010. Both Magistrate Judge
Johnson and Rodney Romano (as the mediator in this case) are very familiar with the
particular case and other claims that were asserted.
8. Defendant’s Counsel has spoken with the secretary for the mediator, Rodney
Romano, and she believes that he would be able to schedule a 2-3 hour mediation on
short notice this week.
WHEREFORE, Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN respectfully requests the Court
to enter an Order directing the parties to attend a Settlement Conference before
Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson, or in the alternative, a mediation on or before July
1, 2010.
Rule 7.1 Certification
I hereby certify that counsel has communicated by telephone with Plaintiff’s
counsel in a good faith effort to resolve the issues set forth herein. Plaintiff’s position is
that the parties have already complied with the mediation requirements.
By: s/Robert D. Critton, Jr.
Robert D. Critton, Jr.
Michael J. Pike
Attorneys for Defendant Epstein
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013478

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document