EFTA00032438.pdf

32.3 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
0
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email chain
File Size: 32.3 KB
Summary

An email chain from September 16, 2019, between officials at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The emails discuss an urgent report regarding the 'DB' (likely Deutsche Bank) aspect of the Epstein case and question whether it should be linked to a 'DB/Kushner' matter or treated as a separate Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) investigation. The forwarding official expresses frustration that the wrong person was copied on the original request.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Jeffrey Epstein Subject of investigation
Mentioned in relation to the 'DB part of Epstein case'
Jared Kushner Subject of investigation (implied)
Mentioned in the context of 'DB/Kushner UMR'
Redacted Sender 1 USANYS Official
Sent the forwarding email expressing frustration ('Ridiculous')
Redacted Sender 2 Deputy United States Attorney
Original sender requesting the urgent report

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
USANYS
United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (Sender/Recipient organization)
DB
Deutsche Bank (implied by context of financial investigations and Kushner link)
United States Attorney's Office Southern District of New York
Listed in signature block

Locations (1)

Location Context
Jurisdiction of the US Attorney's Office

Relationships (2)

Jeffrey Epstein Financial/Investigative Deutsche Bank (DB)
Email discusses 'DB part of Epstein case' and 'Epstein part of DB'
Jared Kushner Financial/Investigative Deutsche Bank (DB)
Email mentions 'DB/Kushner UMR'

Key Quotes (4)

"Wrong [Redacted] cc’d. Ridiculous."
Source
EFTA00032438.pdf
Quote #1
"[Redacted] requests Urgent report on the DB part of Epstein case (or the Epstein part of DB."
Source
EFTA00032438.pdf
Quote #2
"This could be separate UMR or tagged onto the DB/Kushner UMR"
Source
EFTA00032438.pdf
Quote #3
"is it part of pre-existing DB SAR investigation or separate?"
Source
EFTA00032438.pdf
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (919 characters)

From: [Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>
To: [Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>
Subject: Fwd: [Redacted] request
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 20:00:17 +0000
Wrong [Redacted] cc’d. Ridiculous.
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: "[Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>
Date: September 16, 2019 at 3:49:44 PM EDT
To: "[Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>, "[Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>, "[Redacted] (USANYS) 1" <[Redacted]>, "[Redacted] (USANYS) 3" <[Redacted]>
Subject: [Redacted] request
[Redacted] requests Urgent report on the DB part of Epstein case (or the Epstein part of DB. This could be separate UMR or tagged onto the DB/Kushner UMR, depending on how we see it—is it part of pre-existing DB SAR investigation or separate?
Please let me know how you plan to proceed.
Thanks
[Redacted]
Deputy United States Attorney
United States Attorney’s Office
Southern District of New York
[Redacted]
EFTA00032438

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document