Redacted Sender 2
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Redacted Sender 1
|
Business associate |
14
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
Redacted Recipient 2
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Sender 1
|
Professional collaborative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Staff Member (Sender 1)
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Sender 3
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
EFTA00037933.pdf
An email chain from October 4, 2019, discussing logistics for an upcoming briefing involving attorneys. The correspondents discuss the need to collect information for building access and question whether transportation, hotel, and reimbursements will be provided to the attending attorneys. The document is heavily redacted regarding identities.
EFTA00036694.pdf
An email chain from August 16, 2019, discussing an autopsy report. One individual asks a redacted recipient if 'the institution' (likely the prison) has received a copy of the autopsy report. The recipient replies stating they will call the sender. The document contains heavy redactions of names and contact information.
EFTA00036640.pdf
An email thread from August 13, 2019, discussing the 'Weekly GP/SHU Report' for August 12, 2019. The sender of the original message notes they forgot to send the report the previous day. The terminology (GP/SHU) refers to General Population and Special Housing Unit, likely within a Federal Bureau of Prisons facility, contextually relevant to the timeframe immediately following Jeffrey Epstein's death.
EFTA00036164.pdf
This document is an email thread between electronics technicians at various Federal Bureau of Prisons facilities (Otisville, Houston, Sandstone) and external support (SigNet Technologies) dated August 8-9, 2019. The correspondence details widespread technical failures with the 'NICEVision' and 'AMS' video surveillance systems following a software update, specifically citing 'Database Errors' and display glitches. These system failures occurred just days before Jeffrey Epstein's death in federal custody on August 10, 2019.
EFTA00036097.pdf
An email chain dated August 16, 2019, forwarding a memo concerning MDC Brooklyn and MCC New York. The content originates from HRMD (Human Resources Management Division) and was sent shortly after Jeffrey Epstein's death at MCC New York. The specific names of senders and recipients are redacted.
EFTA00035359.pdf
This document is an email thread from August 10, 2019, the date of Jeffrey Epstein's death. It involves a discussion between likely Bureau of Prisons staff regarding a discrepancy in 'Count Slips' (inmate headcounts) for '12am', noting that one record showed 73 inmates while the 'E1' record showed 72. This discrepancy occurred on the morning of the suicide.
EFTA00032725.pdf
This document involves an internal email chain between U.S. Attorneys in the Southern District of New York (SDNY) regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell trial in June 2021. The prosecutors discuss legal strategy concerning a suppression hearing, noting that Maxwell's defense team filed 12 separate Memos of Law (MOLs) to bypass page limits. The correspondence also references past proceedings involving Judge Sweet and Judge McMahon, and requests access to original applications and transcripts.
EFTA00032632.pdf
This document is an email chain from March and April 2021 between US Attorneys (USANYS) regarding a 'moot' (practice court session) for a FOIA case involving Epstein. The emails discuss the preparation for the case 'Times v BOP' (Case 20cv833), coordinate attendance including members of the Bureau of Prisons (BOP), and distribute legal briefs.
EFTA00032476.pdf
This document is an internal email chain from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. An Assistant United States Attorney requests the preparation of binders containing FBI interview notes (302s) and '3500 material' (Jencks Act statements) for two specific witnesses ahead of a trip to Los Angeles in late August 2021 to prepare for trial.
EFTA00032438.pdf
An email chain from September 16, 2019, between officials at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The emails discuss an urgent report regarding the 'DB' (likely Deutsche Bank) aspect of the Epstein case and question whether it should be linked to a 'DB/Kushner' matter or treated as a separate Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) investigation. The forwarding official expresses frustration that the wrong person was copied on the original request.
EFTA00031307.pdf
An email chain from late August 2019 regarding the case 'United States v. Epstein'. The correspondence involves unidentified parties discussing and sharing a transcript of a court hearing that took place earlier that week. The document includes a Bates stamp EFTA00031307.
EFTA00030787.pdf
This document is an internal email chain from the USANYS (United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York) dated February 2020. It outlines a list of tasks for a Tuesday, most of which are redacted, but item number 3 explicitly lists 'Epstein trust documents,' indicating ongoing work regarding Jeffrey Epstein's financial estate.
EFTA00030539.pdf
An internal email thread dated August 6, 2019, discussing a draft response to preservation and production requests related to Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondence includes attachments referencing defense letters and discovery requests. The sender acknowledges the timing is poor but seeks review before sending the document 'up the chain'.
EFTA00029989.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 11, 2020, between officials at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). An Assistant US Attorney shares an attached FBI report (filename 050D-NY-3027571_0000239.pdf) originating from the 'Epstein tip line,' stating it is relevant to the 'MCC guards case.' A recipient replies noting that they are already familiar with the report.
EFTA00028721.pdf
This document is an email thread from January 2020 between officials at the DOJ Office of the Inspector General (OIG) and the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP). The BOP Office of Internal Affairs proposes convening a 'Board of Inquiry' to review operations at MCC New York following the Epstein case, specifically looking at special housing, camera operations, and staffing. The OIG Special Agent in Charge forwards this request to the FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to gauge their position, noting the BOP's assurance that they will avoid conflict with the ongoing criminal investigation.
EFTA00028441.pdf
This document is an email thread from August 2, 2019, discussing a court opinion released that day related to Jeffrey Epstein's bail. The correspondents share a link to a US Court of Appeals document, noting that the opinion involves 'slapping down' a redacted individual.
EFTA00028331.pdf
This document is an email chain dated October 17, 2019, discussing logistics for an 'Epstein victim meeting.' The sender reports positive feedback from a previous meeting in Florida and notes that 15 victims, 3 support persons, and 8 attorneys are expected to attend an upcoming meeting on the 23rd of the month.
EFTA00028207.pdf
This document is an email thread from November 2021 between US Attorneys in the Southern District of New York regarding a draft opposition to a bail motion. The file path included in the email explicitly links the work to the 'USvEpstein' case and 'GM' (Ghislaine Maxwell), specifically referencing a 'government opposition to fourth motion for bail' due on November 8, 2021. The thread involves a Deputy Chief of the Public Corruption Unit submitting a draft for review.
EFTA00027252.pdf
An email chain between USANYS employees dated August 27, 2019, discussing a court proceeding related to Jeffrey Epstein. The emails refer to the event as 'The Epstein circus,' mention a 'gorgeous redirect' by a colleague, and note the presence of '20 victims' who likely spoke at the hearing.
EFTA00027251.pdf
This document is a forwarded email chain dated August 27, 2019, regarding a transcript request for Case No. 19-CR-490 (the federal criminal case against Jeffrey Epstein). The email confirms the attachment of the requested case copy and asks for confirmation of delivery. The names of all senders and recipients have been redacted.
EFTA00027229.pdf
An email chain between employees of the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated August 20, 2019. The subject line references 'Epstein Estate Touhy Requests,' indicating legal proceedings regarding the release of information related to the Epstein Estate. The body of the emails concerns an employee's trip to Dallas, TX for depositions and a colleague's recommendation to visit the JFK museum.
EFTA00027121.pdf
An email chain from August 15, 2019, involving the FBI, USANYS, OIG, and OCME regarding the viewing of surveillance footage related to Jeffrey Epstein. The sender notes that due to 'software issues,' the footage cannot be viewed outside of FBI space and invites the recipients to view it at 290 Broadway.
EFTA00023341.pdf
An email thread from March 2020 involving an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The participants discuss a Detroit News article reporting that the University of Michigan switched law firms (dropping Steptoe) because the firm represented Jeffrey Epstein, Roman Polanski, and Robert Anderson. The prosecutors express a lack of sympathy for the law firm, with comments like 'oops', 'Can't say I feel bad for Steptoe about this', and 'Indeed'.
EFTA00020843.pdf
An email chain from March 2020 regarding the 'US v. Epstein' case. The correspondence discusses significant technical errors in a data set provided by the FBI, specifically issues with linking emails to attachments, native files to load files, and mismatched control numbers. The replier notes the information is 'depressing but extremely helpful' and plans to address it with the FBI.
EFTA00020340.pdf
This document is an email thread from August 19, 2020, discussing an attached 'Anonymous Civilian Crime Report Related to Human Trafficking' (specifically involving child trafficking). The original sender notes that because the report is anonymous, they will not take further action but suggests the recipient can forward it to an agency if interested. The document contains a Bates number EFTA00020340.
[REDACTED] DRAFT 302
Original email circulating a draft 302 report related to the Child Exploitation Human Trafficking Task Force.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity