This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features a procedural discussion between the Judge ('The Court'), Defense attorneys (Mr. Pagliuca, Ms. Sternheim), and the Prosecution (Ms. Comey). The primary topic is whether the government intends to call a rebuttal witness; Ms. Comey indicates they are leaning against it but will decide by the next morning.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Sternheim | Defense Attorney |
Addressing the Judge regarding interference.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the discussion regarding scheduling and witnesses.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Defense Attorney |
Raising issues about a government rebuttal witness and briefing schedules.
|
| Ms. Comey | Prosecutor (Government) |
Stating the government is leaning against calling a rebuttal witness.
|
| Hyppolite | Witness |
Mentioned in the header 'Hyppolite - direct'.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| The Government |
Reference to 'government rebuttal witness'
|
|
| DOJ |
Referenced in footer stamp DOJ-OGR
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by reporter name and case context (SDNY)
|
"It's like I'm getting triple-teamed here. I can barely keep up."Source
"We are leaning against calling that witness."Source
"I doubt we will be calling any rebuttal witnesses."Source
"I'm here all day."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,363 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document